Adult and infant perception of two English phones.

Previous research has shown that young infants easily discriminate both native and non-native consonant contrasts, but by 10-12 months of age infants perform like adults and easily discriminate only native consonant contrasts. The present study was designed to determine what kind of experience is required to maintain discrimination of native consonants. To address this question, English listeners of three ages (6-8 months, 10-12 months, and adults) were presented with the phonetic difference, [da] vs [t = a]. This distinction occurs in English but is not phonemic: [t = a] occurs when it follows an [s] (as in /sta/). If passive exposure is sufficient to maintain discrimination, all age groups should discriminate [da] vs [t = a]. However, if phonological status plays a role, then older infants and adults should fail. In experiment 1, English adults judged [da] and [t = a] to be equally good instances of the same phonemic category /da/. In an AX procedure in experiment 2, English adults discriminated [da] vs [t = a] better than chance but worse than native phonemic levels. In the Conditioned Head Turn procedure in experiment 3, adults and 6- to 8-month-old infants discriminated [da] vs [t = a], but 10- to 12-month-old infants did not. Taken together, these results are most consistent with the hypothesis that phonological status plays a role in maintaining discrimination of phonetic information.

[1]  Joanne L. Miller.  On the internal structure of phonetic categories: a progress report , 1994, Cognition.

[2]  J. Werker.  Becoming A Native Listener , 1989 .

[3]  K. Stevens,et al.  Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. , 1992, Science.

[4]  J. Werker,et al.  Cognitive Influences on Cross-Language Speech Perception in Infancy , 1995 .

[5]  B H Repp,et al.  Effects of preceding context on discrimination of voice onset times , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  O. Bohn,et al.  A cross-language comparison of vowel perception in English-learning and German-learning infants. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Infants' sensitivity to phonotactic patterns in the native language. , 1994 .

[8]  Phonetic similarity influences learning word-object associations in 14-month-old infants , 1995 .

[9]  J. Sussman,et al.  Further tests of the "perceptual magnet effect" in the perception of [i]: identification and change/no-change discrimination. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  L. A. Marascuilo.  Large-sample multiple comparisons. , 1966, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  S. Trehub.  The Discrimination of Foreign Speech Contrasts by Infants and Adults. , 1976 .

[12]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories , 1974, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  J. Werker,et al.  Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life , 1984 .

[14]  P. Jusczyk.  The discovery of spoken language , 1997 .

[15]  J. Grier,et al.  Nonparametric indexes for sensitivity and bias: computing formulas. , 1971, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  Janet F. Werker,et al.  Cross-language speech perception: Initial capabilities and developmental change. , 1988 .

[17]  J. Werker.  Developmental changes in cross-language speech perception: Implications for cognitive models of speech processing. , 1993 .

[18]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Infants' preference for the predominant stress patterns of English words. , 1993, Child development.

[19]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Infants′ Sensitivity to the Sound Patterns of Native Language Words , 1993 .

[20]  Catherine T. Best,et al.  Divergent developmental patterns for infants' perception of two nonnative consonant contrasts , 1995 .

[21]  A. Woodward,et al.  Infants' sensitivity to word boundaries in fluent speech , 1996, Journal of Child Language.

[22]  W. Strange.  Speech perception and linguistic experience : issues in cross-language research , 1995 .

[23]  P. Kuhl.  Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  Catherine T. Best,et al.  Learning to perceive the sound pattern of english , 1995 .

[25]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Variability in early communicative development. , 1994, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[26]  B. Repp,et al.  Difference in Second-Formant Transitions between Aspirated and Unaspirated Stop Consonants Preceding [α] , 1987 .

[27]  L Polka,et al.  Linguistic influences in adult perception of non-native vowel contrasts. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  N. Viemeister,et al.  Noncategorical perception of stop consonants differing in VOT. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  J. Ohala,et al.  Phonetic Explanations for the Development of Tones , 1979 .

[30]  R M Warren,et al.  Criterion shift rule and perceptual homeostasis. , 1985, Psychological review.

[31]  B. Repp,et al.  Difference in second-formant transitions between aspirated and unaspirated stop consonants preceding [a]. , 1987, Language and speech.

[32]  J. Werker,et al.  Developmental aspects of cross-language speech perception. , 1981, Child development.

[33]  Linda Polka,et al.  The Conditioned head turn procedure as a method for testing infant speech perception , 1997 .

[34]  J S Logan,et al.  Cross-language evidence for three factors in speech perception , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[35]  Janet F. Werker,et al.  Cross-language speech perception: Developmental change does not involve loss , 1994 .

[36]  C. Best,et al.  Examination of perceptual reorganization for nonnative speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  L. Gerstman,et al.  The Perception of English Stops by Speakers of English, Spanish. Hungarian, and Thai: A Tape-Cutting Experiment , 1960 .

[38]  L. Polka.  Cross-language speech perception in adults: phonemic, phonetic, and acoustic contributions. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[39]  Patricia K. Kuhl,et al.  Innate Predispositions and the Effects of Experience in Speech Perception: The Native Language Magnet Theory , 1993 .

[40]  J. Werker,et al.  Phonemic and phonetic factors in adult cross-language speech perception. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.