Laboratory lesson plans: Opportunities created by remote laboratories

Over the last decade remote laboratories have emerged as valuable educational resources, providing the potential for improved educational outcomes, student flexibility, richer laboratory experiences, and cross-institutional resource sharing. While there has been increasing attention given to the pedagogy that underpins the use of remote labs, the focus on the design of the lessons that take advantage of remote laboratories has been much more limited. In this paper it is argued that remote laboratories provide an exciting opportunity to provide system-supported adaptation. In particular, because the interactions with the equipment are now mediated through software, it becomes possible to monitor these interactions, as well as the state of the apparatus, and use this to provide guidance to the student. The paper discusses the opportunities that are created, the requirements this places on the design of remote laboratory systems, and preliminary work on implementing such a system that has highlighted potential challenges.

[1]  Chaya Venkatachelam,et al.  Cookbook versus creative chemistry: A new approach to research-oriented general chemistry laboratory , 1974 .

[2]  James C. Lester,et al.  Towards Narrative-Centered Learning Environments , 1999 .

[3]  J. Fouts,et al.  Interdisciplinary Curriculum: The Research Base , 2001 .

[4]  J.V. Nickerson,et al.  Remote versus hands-on labs: a comparative study , 2004, 34th Annual Frontiers in Education, 2004. FIE 2004..

[5]  John M. Keller,et al.  Motivation and instructional design: A theoretical perspective , 1979 .

[6]  S. Farnham-Diggory.  Paradigms of Knowledge and Instruction , 1994 .

[7]  M. Driscoll.  Psychology of Learning for Instruction , 1993 .

[8]  Susan M. Williams,et al.  When Computer Technologies Meet the Learning Sciences: Issues and Opportunities , 2000 .

[9]  Anne Gardner,et al.  Improvements in the self and peer assessment tool SPARK: Do they improve learning outcomes? , 2008 .

[10]  Lawrence A. Crowl,et al.  Distance learning applied to control engineering laboratories , 1996 .

[11]  J. Keller.  Motivational Design of Instruction , 1983 .

[12]  Jan Herrington,et al.  Critical characteristics of situated learning: Implications for the instructional design of multimedia , 1995 .

[13]  C. J. P. Nolan,et al.  Distance Education for the Gifted and Talented: An Interactive Design Model , 1999 .

[14]  Ian D. Rattee,et al.  Discovery or Invention , 2008 .

[15]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Toward a design theory of problem solving , 2000 .

[16]  B. McCombs,et al.  A Learner-Centered Framework for E-Learning , 2005, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[17]  David S. Miall.  Experiencing narrative worlds: On the psychological activities of reading , 2000 .

[18]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[19]  F. Reif,et al.  Teaching physicists’ thinking skills in the laboratory , 1979 .

[20]  Uzoamaka P. Anakwe,et al.  Receptivity to Distance Learnings The Effect of Technology, Reputation, Constraints, and Learning Preferences , 2001 .

[21]  Les Kirkup,et al.  Realizing a framework for enhancing the laboratory experiences of non-physics majors: from pilot to large-scale implementation , 2010 .

[22]  E. Wagner.  Interactivity: From Agents to Outcomes. , 1997 .

[23]  Jeffrey V. Nickerson,et al.  Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories: A comparative literature review , 2006, CSUR.

[24]  Albert J. Rosa,et al.  The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate Engineering Education , 2005 .

[25]  Keith Willey,et al.  Improving teamwork and engagement: the case for self and peer assessment , 2006 .

[26]  Udo Winand,et al.  The sharable content object reference model (SCORM) - a critical review , 2002, International Conference on Computers in Education, 2002. Proceedings..

[27]  W. Worek,et al.  Learning objectives for engineering education laboratories , 2002, 32nd Annual Frontiers in Education.

[28]  J. W. Overstreet,et al.  An Internet-based real-time control engineering laboratory , 1999 .

[29]  Marilyn Dorman,et al.  Enriching Distance Teaching and Learning of Undergraduate Mathematics Using Videoconferencing and Audiographics , 1998 .

[30]  Curtis J. Bonk,et al.  Learner Issues With WWW-Based Systems , 1999 .

[31]  Anita Jackson,et al.  When talking doesn't help: An investigation of microcomputer-based group problem solving , 1992 .

[32]  Caroline Haythornthwaite,et al.  Community Development Among Distance Learners: Temporal and Technological Dimensions , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..