A one dimensional solid oxide electrolyzer-fuel cell stack model and its application to the analysis of a high efficiency system for oxygen production

Abstract This paper presents a finite difference one-dimensional (1D) model of a single unit SOFC–SOEC stack, a novel technology based on the integration of a solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) and solid oxide electrolyzer (SOEC), and a promising candidate for the high efficiency production of oxygen and/or hydrogen, especially for small scale applications. The model is applied to determine the performance of a SOFC–SOEC integrated system for oxygen production which has been previously analysed by means of a simplified zero-dimensional or lumped volume approach. The improved 1D model is used to explore the impact of different system configurations and operating conditions. It is shown that the simplified approach previously used overestimates the performance of the system by up to 60%. Despite this, the results presented here show an electricity consumption in optimized conditions in the range of 0.35–0.5 kW h/kgO2, still significantly lower than that of state of the art technology for small scale oxygen production systems.

[1]  N. Brandon,et al.  A novel system for the production of pure hydrogen from natural gas based on solid oxide fuel cell–solid oxide electrolyzer , 2010 .

[2]  V. Zelizko,et al.  Tubular zirconia–yttria electrolyte membrane technology for oxygen separation , 2002 .

[3]  E. Kakaras,et al.  Design and exergetic analysis of a novel carbon free tri-generation system for hydrogen, power and heat production from natural gas, based on combined solid oxide fuel and electrolyser cells , 2010 .

[4]  V. Ivanov,et al.  Electrochemical cell with solid oxide electrolyte and oxygen pump thereof , 2011 .

[5]  N. Brandon,et al.  Hydrogen production through steam electrolysis: Model-based steady state performance of a cathode-supported intermediate temperature solid oxide electrolysis cell , 2007 .

[6]  C. Adjiman,et al.  Anode-supported intermediate temperature direct internal reforming solid oxide fuel cell. I: model-based steady-state performance , 2004 .

[7]  Jaka Sunarso,et al.  Mixed ionic-electronic conducting (MIEC) ceramic-based membranes for oxygen separation , 2008 .

[8]  S. Jensen,et al.  Hydrogen and synthetic fuel production from renewable energy sources , 2007 .

[9]  B. Moghtaderi.  Application of Chemical Looping Concept for Air Separation at High Temperatures , 2010 .

[10]  Ito Wataru,et al.  Oxygen separation from compressed air using a mixed conducting perovskite-type oxide membrane , 2007 .

[11]  W. F. Castle.  Air separation and liquefaction: recent developments and prospects for the beginning of the new millennium , 2002 .

[12]  P. Dyer,et al.  Ion transport membrane technology for oxygen separation and syngas production , 2000 .

[13]  D. D. Brengel,et al.  Electrochemical Oxygen Separation Using Solid Electrolyte Ion Transport Membranes , 2002 .

[14]  Paolo Iora,et al.  High efficiency process for the production of pure oxygen based on solid oxide fuel cell–solid oxide electrolyzer technology , 2009 .

[15]  A. Jacobson,et al.  Electrically driven oxygen separation through gadolinia-doped ceria using PrBaCo2O5 + x and NdBaCo2O5 + x electrodes , 2011 .

[16]  C. Adjiman,et al.  Comparison of two IT DIR-SOFC models: Impact of variable thermodynamic, physical, and flow properties. Steady-state and dynamic analysis , 2005 .

[17]  A. Smith,et al.  A review of air separation technologies and their integration with energy conversion processes , 2001 .