Low-molecular-weight heparin for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke

BACKGROUND Despite doubts about their efficacy and concern about their safety, antithrombotic agents are often used to treat acute ischemic stroke. Recent experience in patients with other thromboembolic disorders suggests that low-molecular-weight heparin, which requires only subcutaneous administration once or twice daily, may be more effective and safer than standard (unfractionated) heparin. METHODS We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial comparing two dosages of low-molecular-weight heparin with placebo in the treatment of ischemic stroke. Patients were randomly assigned within 48 hours of the onset of symptoms to receive high-dose nadroparin (4100 anti-factor Xa IU twice daily), low-dose nadroparin (4100 IU once daily), or placebo subcutaneously for 10 days. The primary measure of outcome was death or dependency regarding activities of daily living six months after randomization. Secondary outcomes were death, hemorrhagic transformation of the infarction, and other complications at 10 days, and death or dependency at 3 months. RESULTS A total of 2750 patients were screened for the study. Among 312 patients randomized, 306 had outcomes that were analyzed at six months. Forty-five patients (45 percent) in the high-dose group, 53 patients (52 percent) in the low-dose group, and 68 patients (65 percent) in the placebo group died or became dependent. There was a significant dose-dependent effect among the three study groups in favor of low-molecular-weight heparin (P = 0.005 by the chi-square test for trend). No significant differences among the groups in the occurrence of secondary outcomes were observed at 10 days. CONCLUSIONS For patients with ischemic stroke treated within 48 hours of the onset of symptoms, low-molecular-weight heparin was effective in improving outcomes at six months.

[1]  J. Hirsh,et al.  Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients treated with low-molecular-weight heparin or unfractionated heparin. , 1995, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  M. Eliasziw,et al.  Drugs and surgery in the prevention of ischemic stroke. , 1995, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  G. Hankey,et al.  Validation of a clinical classification for subtypes of acute cerebral infarction. , 1994, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[4]  J. Grotta,et al.  Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke A Statement for Healthcare Professionals , 2005 .

[5]  G. Simonneau,et al.  Comparison of efficacy and safety of low molecular weight heparins and unfractionated heparin in initial treatment of deep venous thrombosis: a meta-analysis , 1994, BMJ.

[6]  J. Woo,et al.  Pilot Study of Low‐Molecular‐Weight Heparin in the Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke , 1994, Stroke.

[7]  J. Slattery,et al.  Can Simple Questions Assess Outcome after Stroke , 1994 .

[8]  M. Musicco,et al.  Telephone Interview for Stroke Outcome Assessment , 1994 .

[9]  J. Slattery,et al.  Interobserver Reliability of a Clinical Classification of Acute Cerebral Infarction , 1993, Stroke.

[10]  J. Hirsh Low molecular weight heparin , 2007 .

[11]  V. Kakkar,et al.  Low molecular weight versus standard heparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism after major abdominal surgery , 1993, The Lancet.

[12]  R. Marshall,et al.  Current management of ischaemic stroke. , 1993, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[13]  J. Slattery,et al.  Antithrombotic therapy in acute ischaemic stroke: an overview of the completed randomised trials. , 1993, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[14]  David Lee Gordon,et al.  Classification of Subtype of Acute Ischemic Stroke: Definitions for Use in a Multicenter Clinical Trial , 1993, Stroke.

[15]  J. Woo,et al.  Stroke subtypes among Chinese living in Hong Kong , 1992, Neurology.

[16]  G. Raskob,et al.  Subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin compared with continuous intravenous heparin in the treatment of proximal-vein thrombosis. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  K Wienhard,et al.  Progressive Derangement of Periinfarct Viable Tissue in Ischemic Stroke , 1992, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[18]  H. Büller,et al.  Comparison of subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin with intravenous standard heparin in proximal deep-vein thrombosis , 1992, The Lancet.

[19]  J. Rothrock,et al.  Antithrombotic therapy in cerebrovascular disease. , 1991, Annals of internal medicine.

[20]  J. Biller,et al.  Antithrombotic Therapy for Ischemic Cerebrovascular Disease , 1991, Seminars in neurology.

[21]  J. Bamford,et al.  Classification and natural history of clinically identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction , 1991, The Lancet.

[22]  H. Adams,et al.  Use of antithrombotic drugs in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke , 1989, Neurology.

[23]  L. Caplan To heparinize or not: an unsettled issue. , 1989 .

[24]  S. Phillips,et al.  An alternative view of heparin anticoagulation in acute focal brain ischemia. , 1989, Stroke.

[25]  Heparin anticoagulation in acute brain ischemia. , 1988, Stroke.

[26]  D Shinar,et al.  Reliability of the activities of daily living scale and its use in telephone interview. , 1988, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[27]  R L Hewer,et al.  Functional abilities after stroke: measurement, natural history and prognosis , 2012, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[28]  D. Sackett,et al.  The Ends of Human Life: Medical Ethics in a Liberal Polity , 1992, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[29]  Granger Cv,et al.  Stroke rehabilitation: analysis of repeated Barthel index measures. , 1979, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.