Abstract : The U.S. Air Force is in the process of implementing a substantially larger role for space operations and a new operations system, the space-based infrared system (SBIRS), to accompany that role. Despite the increased responsibility that will accompany this new role and the implementation of SBIRS, increases in satellite operations personnel may not occur and if they do, they are unlikely to be commensurate with the increase in responsibility. In this effort we have identified SBIRS System Crew Chief (SCCH) task performance demands that are likely to be worsened by the pending increase in workload but which, if managed well, can reduce its negative impact. These task demands are event prioritization, task allocation, and team communications. In this paper, we describe the design stages and design of a training and performance support system, the Adaptive Decision Enabling and Performance Tracking Toolkit (ADEPTT), that will assist the SCCH manage team coordination and perform the aforementioned tasks in particular during high workload periods. ADEPTT will be built using a cognitive agent architecture and will have four major components: 1. supervisory agents, 2. an instructional agent, 3. a crew communication tool, and 4. synthetic teammates - in order to provide comprehensive training and performance support. It is our goal to build ADEPTT so that it is maximally supportive, minimally obtrusive, has a minimal learning curve, and integrates easily into current training and operations. In designing this toolkit, we followed human-centered design principles, taking into account the demands and limitations operators already face, and being careful to not add to existing problems such as limited display space. This required us to work closely with members of the SBIRS operational community and use research tools such as cognitive task analysis methods.
[1]
Stephanie Guerlain,et al.
Interactive Critiquing as a Form of Decision Support: An Empirical Evaluation
,
1999,
Hum. Factors.
[2]
Eduardo Salas,et al.
Making decisions under stress: Implications for individual and team training.
,
1998
.
[3]
R. Schmidt,et al.
New Conceptualizations of Practice: Common Principles in Three Paradigms Suggest New Concepts for Training
,
1992
.
[4]
E F Loftus,et al.
Misinformation and memory: the creation of new memories.
,
1989,
Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[5]
Allen Newell,et al.
The psychology of human-computer interaction
,
1983
.
[6]
Richard T. Kelly,et al.
Implications of Decision Making Research for Decision Support and Displays
,
1998
.
[7]
Stephen J. Andriole,et al.
Cognitive Systems Engineering for User-computer Interface Design, Prototyping, and Evaluation
,
1995
.
[8]
Roberta Calderwood,et al.
Critical decision method for eliciting knowledge
,
1989,
IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..
[9]
Richard Reviewer-Granger.
Unified Theories of Cognition
,
1991,
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[10]
Wayne Zachary,et al.
Cognitive task analysis and modeling of decision making in complex environments.
,
1998
.