Quantum entanglement and a metaphysics of relations

This paper argues for a metaphysics of relations based on a characterization of quantum entanglement in terms of non-separability, thereby regarding entanglement as a sort of holism. By contrast to a radical metaphysics of relations, the position set out in this paper recognizes things that stand in the relations, but claims that, as far as the relations are concerned, there is no need for these things to have qualitative intrinsic properties underlying the relations. This position thus opposes a metaphysics of individual things that are characterized by intrinsic properties. A principal problem of the latter position is that it seems that we cannot gain any knowledge of these properties insofar as they are intrinsic. Against this background, the rationale behind a metaphysics of relations is to avoid a gap between epistemology and metaphysics.

[1]  I. Hacking.  The Identity of Indiscernibles , 1975 .

[2]  Paul Teller,et al.  Relational Holism and Quantum Mechanics1 , 1986, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[3]  S. Weidenschilling,et al.  A plurality of worlds , 1991, Nature.

[4]  Richard Healey,et al.  Holism in philosophy of mind and philosophy of physics , 2003 .

[5]  J. Ladyman.  What is Structural Realism , 1998 .

[6]  James T. Cushing,et al.  Philosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory Reflections on Bell's Theorem , 1989 .

[7]  A. Einstein.  QUANTEN‐MECHANIK UND WIRKLICHKEIT , 1948 .

[8]  James Ladyman,et al.  Remodelling Structural Realism: Quantum Physics and the Metaphysics of Structure , 2003, Synthese.

[9]  D. Howard.  Einstein on locality and separability , 1985 .

[10]  David Carr,et al.  Kantian Humility: Our Ignorance of Things in Themselves , 2000 .

[11]  C. Rovelli,et al.  Relational Quantum Mechanics , 2006 .

[12]  N. Bohr.  II - Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete? , 1935 .

[13]  Eric Winsberg,et al.  Quantum Life: Interaction, Entanglement, and Separation , 2003 .

[14]  J. Worrall.  Structural Realism: The Best of Both Worlds?* , 1989 .

[15]  N. David Mermin,et al.  What is quantum mechanics trying to tell us , 1998, quant-ph/9801057.

[16]  Steven French.  Individuality, supervenience and Bell's theorem , 1989 .

[17]  K. Himma.  From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis , 2003 .

[18]  R. Healey.  Holism and Nonseparability , 1991 .

[19]  Thomas Müller,et al.  Against a Minimalist Reading of Bell's Theorem: Lessons from Fine , 2001, Synthese.

[20]  Albert Einstein,et al.  Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? , 1935 .

[21]  B. D'espagnat.  Conceptual Foundations Of Quantum Mechanics , 1971 .

[22]  D. Lewis.  Philosophical Papers: Volume II , 1987 .

[23]  A. Ayer.  The Identity of Indiscernibles , 1954 .

[24]  F. Jackson,et al.  From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis , 2000 .

[25]  R. Dipert.  The mathematical structure of the world: The world as graph , 1997 .

[26]  Robert Merrihew Adams,et al.  Primitive Thisness and Primitive Identity , 1979 .

[27]  D. Braddon-Mitchell.  NATURE'S CAPACITIES AND THEIR MEASUREMENT , 1991 .

[28]  M. Redhead,et al.  Quantum Physics and the Identity of Indiscernibles* , 1988, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[29]  David Lewis,et al.  Papers in metaphysics and epistemology , 1999 .

[30]  Frank Jackson,et al.  From Metaphysics to Ethics , 2000 .