A new high-speed visual stimulation method for gaze-contingent eye movement and brain activity studies

Approaches using eye movements as markers of ongoing brain activity to investigate perceptual and cognitive processes were able to implement highly sophisticated paradigms driven by eye movement recordings. Crucially, these paradigms involve display changes that have to occur during the time of saccadic blindness, when the subject is unaware of the change. Therefore, a combination of high-speed eye tracking and high-speed visual stimulation is required in these paradigms. For combined eye movement and brain activity studies (e.g., fMRI, EEG, MEG), fast and exact timing of display changes is especially important, because of the high susceptibility of the brain to visual stimulation. Eye tracking systems already achieve sampling rates up to 2000 Hz, but recent LCD technologies for computer screens reduced the temporal resolution to mostly 60 Hz, which is too slow for gaze-contingent display changes. We developed a high-speed video projection system, which is capable of reliably delivering display changes within the time frame of < 5 ms. This could not be achieved even with the fastest cathode ray tube (CRT) monitors available (< 16 ms). The present video projection system facilitates the realization of cutting-edge eye movement research requiring reliable high-speed visual stimulation (e.g., gaze-contingent display changes, short-time presentation, masked priming). Moreover, this system can be used for fast visual presentation in order to assess brain activity using various methods, such as electroencephalography (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The latter technique was previously excluded from high-speed visual stimulation, because it is not possible to operate conventional CRT monitors in the strong magnetic field of an MRI scanner. Therefore, the present video projection system offers new possibilities for studying eye movement-related brain activity using a combination of eye tracking and fMRI.

[1]  Mark T. Waters,et al.  This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits distribution,andreproductioninanymedium,providedtheoriginalauthorandsourcearecredited.Thislicensedoesnot permit commercial exploitation or the creation of derivative works without sp , 2009 .

[2]  Frans W Cornelissen,et al.  Fixation based event‐related fmri analysis: Using eye fixations as events in functional magnetic resonance imaging to reveal cortical processing during the free exploration of visual images , 2012, Human Brain Mapping.

[3]  Clementine Thurgood,et al.  Light Emitting Diodes as a Rapid Visual Display for Use in Psychological Experiments , 2013 .

[4]  K. Rayner.  The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[5]  Neil Stewart,et al.  A PC parallel port button box provides millisecond response time accuracy under Linux , 2006, Behavior research methods.

[6]  Thierry Baccino,et al.  Eye fixation–related potentials (EFRPs) during object identification , 2010, Visual Neuroscience.

[7]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  Trans-saccadic parafoveal preview benefits in fluent reading: A study with fixation-related brain potentials , 2012, NeuroImage.

[8]  Alan F. Smeaton,et al.  Eye fixation related potentials in a target search task , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[9]  K. Rayner,et al.  Eye movements and display change detection during reading. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  Michael Dorr,et al.  Effects Of Gaze-Contingent Stimuli On Eye Movements , 2004 .

[11]  K Rayner,et al.  Reading without a fovea. , 1979, Science.

[12]  J. O'Regan.  Eye movements and reading. , 1990, Reviews of oculomotor research.

[13]  Sarah J. White,et al.  Eye movements and the modulation of parafoveal processing by foveal processing difficulty: A reexamination , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[14]  K. Holmqvist,et al.  Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: Evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials , 2009, Brain and Language.

[15]  Mario Braun,et al.  Welcome to the real world: Validating fixation-related brain potentials for ecologically valid settings , 2007, Brain Research.

[16]  Mariano Sigman,et al.  Fixation-related potentials in visual search: a combined EEG and eye tracking study. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[17]  Sven-Thomas Graupner,et al.  Saccadic context indicates information processing within visual fixations: evidence from event-related potentials and eye-movements analysis of the distractor effect. , 2011, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[18]  Thierry Baccino,et al.  Eye-Fixation-Related Potentials: Insight into Parafoveal Processing , 2005 .

[19]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Coregistration of eye movements and EEG in natural reading: analyses and review. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[20]  Albrecht W. Inhoff,et al.  Eye-movement-contingent display changes are not compromised by flicker and phosphor persistence , 1998 .

[21]  G. McConkie,et al.  The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading , 1975 .

[22]  Cees van Leeuwen,et al.  Eye fixation-related potentials in free viewing identify encoding failures in change detection , 2011, NeuroImage.

[23]  M. Kronbichler,et al.  Fixation-Related fMRI Analysis in the Domain of Reading Research: Using Self-Paced Eye Movements as Markers for Hemodynamic Brain Responses During Visual Letter String Processing , 2013, Cerebral cortex.