Design of X-shaped double split tee joints accounting for moment–shear interaction

Abstract Dealing with steel moment resisting frames (MRFs), the latest version of Eurocode 8 allows us to dissipate the seismic input energy in connections provided that their characteristics under cyclic loads are certified by means of experimental testing. Within the beam-to-column joint typologies to be used in seismic resistant steel frames, the double split tee joint (DST) represents an interesting solution due to its easy fabrication and repair after a destructive seismic event. Nevertheless, the cyclic behavior of this joint typology is usually characterized by pinching and strength degradation phenomena due to the plastic engagement of the rectangular T-stubs which compromises the use of DST joints as dissipative elements. Within this framework, in this paper, in order to improve the hysteretic behavior of this connection typology, a new type of dissipative DST joint is presented. In particular, the proposed dissipative T-stub is designed substituting the rectangular T-stubs with the so-called X-shaped T-stubs, whose flange plates are cut into an hourglass shape similar to that of ADAS dampers. In particular, in the paper, a model that is able to predict the resistance of the proposed X-shaped T-stubs accounting for moment–shear interaction is developed and rules for designing the optimum shape of dissipative DST joints are proposed. Finally, the results of an experimental activity on real scale joints are presented aiming to verify the reliability of the proposed design approach and to compare the cyclic behavior of classical and X-shaped DST joints evidencing the benefits provided by the proposed dissipative joint.

[1]  Douglas A. Foutch,et al.  Performance evaluation of new steel frame buildings for seismic loads , 2002 .

[2]  D. C. Drucker.  The Effect of Shear on the Plastic Bending of Beams , 1955 .

[3]  Vincenzo Piluso,et al.  Experimental Analysis of Bolted Steel Beam-to-Column Connections: Component Identification , 2011 .

[4]  Vincenzo Piluso,et al.  Ultimate Behavior of Bolted T-Stubs I: Theoretical Model , 2001 .

[5]  Arturo Tena-Colunga,et al.  Mathematical modelling of the ADAS energy dissipation device , 1997 .

[6]  James A. Swanson,et al.  BOLTED STEEL CONNECTIONS: TESTS ON T-STUB COMPONENTS , 2000 .

[7]  Riccardo Zandonini,et al.  Experimental analysis and modelling of semi-rigid steel joints under cyclic reversal loading , 1996 .

[8]  Vincenzo Piluso,et al.  Experimental analysis and modelling of bolted T-stubs under cyclic loads , 2008 .

[9]  Vincenzo Piluso,et al.  Cyclic Modeling of Bolted Beam-to-Column Connections: Component Approach , 2011 .

[10]  A. Astaneh,et al.  Dynamic behavior of flexible, semirigid and rigid steel frames , 1991 .

[11]  T. T. Soong,et al.  Passive Energy Dissipation Systems for Structural Design and Retrofit , 1998 .

[12]  Gianvittorio Rizzano,et al.  Experimental Behavior and Mechanical Modeling of Dissipative T-Stub Connections , 2012 .

[13]  Luís Simões da Silva,et al.  Design of Steel Structures: Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures, Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings , 2010 .

[14]  Gianvittorio Rizzano,et al.  Full strength design of column base connections accounting for random material variability , 2013 .

[15]  T. T. Soong,et al.  Supplemental energy dissipation: state-of-the-art and state-of-the- practice , 2002 .

[16]  Vincenzo Piluso,et al.  Experimental analysis of innovative dissipative bolted double split tee beam‐to‐column connections , 2011 .

[17]  Michael D. Engelhardt,et al.  Monotonic and cyclic loading models for panel zones in steel moment frames , 2002 .

[18]  Experimental analysis and mechanical modeling of T-stubs with four bolts per row , 2014 .

[19]  Vincenzo Piluso,et al.  Rotational behaviour of column base plate connections: Experimental analysis and modelling , 2014 .

[20]  José Miguel Castro,et al.  Modelling of the panel zone in steel and composite moment frames , 2005 .

[21]  Gianvittorio Rizzano,et al.  A theoretical model for predicting the rotational capacity of steel base joints , 2013 .

[22]  Chanakya Arya,et al.  Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures , 2018, Design of Structural Elements.

[23]  Vincenzo Piluso,et al.  Failure mode control: economy of semi-rigid frames , 1998 .

[24]  M. Latour,et al.  Experimental analysis on friction materials for supplemental damping devices , 2014 .

[25]  Gianvittorio Rizzano.  SEISMIC DESIGN OF STEEL FRAMES WITH PARTIAL STRENGTH JOINTS , 2006 .