Analysis of the fusion performance, beam–target neutrons and synergistic effects of JET’s high-performance pulses

Achieving high neutron yields in today’s fusion research relies on high-power auxiliary heating in order to attain required core temperatures. This is usually achieved by means of high neutral beam (NB) and radio frequency (RF) power. Application of NB power is accompanied by production of fast beam ions and associated beam–target (BT) reactions. In standard JET operational conditions, deuterium (D) NBs are injected into D plasmas. The injected beams comprise D atoms at full, one-half and one-third injected energy. Typically, the full energy of the injected D beams is between 90 and 120 keV, providing 1.4–2.0 MW of heating, which is about half of the injected power. Half-energy D beams carry about one-third of the injected power and the rest of the power is carried by the third energy fraction of D beams. Under these conditions, thermal fusion reactions, i.e. those between plasma ions, and BT reactions are of the same order of magnitude. This study addresses important issues regarding the impact of density, central electron and ion temperatures and their ratio, T i(0)/T e(0), on fusion performance, measured by the total neutron yield and BT neutron counts. NB/RF synergistic effects are discussed as well. It is demonstrated that thermal fusion gain increases linearly with normalised plasma pressure, β N, and confinement, B t τ. The BT neutrons are, however, more difficult to predict and this task in general requires numerical treatment. In this study, BT neutrons in JET’s best-performing baseline and hybrid pulses are analysed and the underlying dependencies discussed. Central fast ion densities are found to decrease with increased density and density peaking. This is attributed to poorer beam penetration at high density. The BT reactions however are unchanged and can even increase if operating at higher core temperatures. An increase in the central ion temperature and T i(0)/T e(0) ratio leads to higher total and BT reaction rates whilst simultaneously the ratio of the BT to total neutron decreases significantly. NB/RF synergistic effects are found to have a negligible impact on total neutron rate. This can be explained by the reduced beam penetration in high-density conditions leading to lower central fast ion density.

[1]  H. Weisen,et al.  Role of JETPEAK database in validation of synthetic neutron camera diagnostics and ASCOT- AFSI fast particle and fusion product calculation chain in JET , 2019, Journal of Instrumentation.

[2]  S. Lanthaler,et al.  Overview of the JET preparation for deuterium–tritium operation with the ITER like-wall , 2019, Nuclear Fusion.

[3]  J. Citrin,et al.  First principles and integrated modelling achievements towards trustful fusion power predictions for JET and ITER , 2019, Nuclear Fusion.

[4]  C. Giroud,et al.  Scenario development for D–T operation at JET , 2019, Nuclear Fusion.

[5]  P. Lomas,et al.  Fast ion synergistic effects in JET high performance pulses , 2019, Nuclear Fusion.

[6]  C. Kessel,et al.  Assessment of the baseline scenario at q95 ~ 3 for ITER , 2018, Nuclear Fusion.

[7]  J. Garcia,et al.  Modelling of JET hybrid plasmas with emphasis on performance of combined ICRF and NBI heating , 2018, Nuclear Fusion.

[8]  Orso Meneghini,et al.  Orchestrating TRANSP Simulations for Interpretative and Predictive Tokamak Modeling with OMFIT , 2018 .

[9]  Hyun-Tae Kim,et al.  High fusion performance at high Ti/Te in JET-ILW baseline plasmas with high NBI heating power and low gas puffing , 2018 .

[10]  J. Contributors,et al.  The Role of Combined ICRF and NBI Heating in JET Hybrid Plasmas in Quest for High D-T Fusion Yield , 2017 .

[11]  C. D. Challis,et al.  Key impact of finite-beta and fast ions in core and edge tokamak regions for the transition to advanced scenarios , 2015 .

[12]  G. Pucella,et al.  Improved confinement in JET high β plasmas with an ITER-like wall , 2015, 1501.03929.

[13]  F. Jenko,et al.  Nonlinear stabilization of tokamak microturbulence by fast ions. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[14]  Anders Hjalmarsson,et al.  Neutron spectroscopy measurements and modeling of neutral beam heating fast ion dynamics , 2010 .

[15]  A. Murari,et al.  Neutron fluence measurements on the JET tokamak by means of super-heated fluid detectors , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Plasma Science - Abstracts.

[16]  Anders Hjalmarsson,et al.  The 2.5-MeV neutron time-of-flight spectrometer TOFOR for experiments at JET , 2008 .

[17]  Choong-Seock Chang,et al.  Enhancement of NUBEAM for the simulation of fast ion and RF-wave interaction based on the quasi-linear theory , 2007 .

[18]  A. Polevoi,et al.  Chapter 1: Overview and summary , 2007 .

[19]  T. Fujita,et al.  Chapter 2: Plasma confinement and transport , 2007 .

[20]  Choong-Seock Chang,et al.  Development of XGC-RF for Global Guiding-Center Particle Simulation of minority ICRH heated Plasmas in a General Tokmak Geometry , 2006 .

[21]  C. C. Petty,et al.  Sizing up plasmas using dimensionless parametersa) , 2006 .

[22]  G. V. Pereverzev,et al.  Theoretical predictions of the density profile in a tokamak reactor , 2005 .

[23]  G. Bateman,et al.  The tokamak Monte Carlo fast ion module NUBEAM in the National Transport Code Collaboration library , 2004 .

[24]  G. Giruzzi,et al.  Impact of bulk non-Maxwellian electrons on electron temperature measurements (invited) , 2003 .

[25]  Current Drive Chapter 6: Plasma auxiliary heating and current drive , 1999 .

[26]  Gruzinov,et al.  Invariant measure and turbulent pinch in tokamaks. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[27]  G. J. Sadler,et al.  The JET neutron emission profile monitor , 1993 .

[28]  H. Bosch,et al.  ERRATUM: Improved formulas for fusion cross-sections and thermal reactivities , 1992 .

[29]  R. Budny,et al.  Simulations of deuterium-tritium experiments in TFTR , 1992 .

[30]  Jet Team,et al.  Fusion energy-production from a deuterium-tritium plasma in the jet tokamak , 1992 .

[31]  D. Mikkelsen Approximation for non-resonant beam target fusion reactivities , 1989 .

[32]  D. L. Jassby,et al.  Neutral-beam-driven tokamak fusion reactors , 1977 .

[33]  T. H. Stix,et al.  Heating of toroidal plasmas by neutral injection , 1972 .

[34]  J. Contributors,et al.  Synergistic ICRH and NBI heating for fast ion generation and maximising fusion rate in mixed plasmas at JET , 2019 .

[35]  C. Giroud,et al.  Plasma confinement at JET , 2015 .

[36]  G. Pucella,et al.  Improved Confinement in JET High Beta Plasmas with an ITER-Like Wall , 2015 .

[37]  N. Fisch Plasma Physics and Controlled Nuclear Fusion , 2010 .

[38]  A. Hjalmarsson Development and Construction of a 2.5-MeV Neutron Time-of-Flight Spectrometer Optimized for Rate (TOFOR) , 2006 .

[39]  L. Ingesson,et al.  JET – R ( 99 ) 06 Comparison of Methods to Determine the Total Radiated Power in JET , 2001 .

[40]  Marco Brambilla,et al.  Numerical simulation of ion cyclotron waves in tokamak plasmas , 1999 .

[41]  B. Schunke,et al.  Recent developments in LIDAR Thomson scattering measurements on JET (invited) , 1995 .

[42]  R. J. Hawryluk,et al.  An Empirical Approach to Tokamak Transport , 1981 .