Immunotherapy in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Treatment: Current Status and the Role of Imaging

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality and is responsible for more deaths than breast, prostate, and colon cancer combined. Most patients are diagnosed with advanced disease at the time of presentation, and treatment options have traditionally included surgery, chemotherapy, and/or radiation. However, significant advances in the molecular characterization of lung cancer have led to the creation of effective immunotherapies that assist in the recognition of cancer as foreign by the host immune system, stimulate the immune system, and relieve the inhibition that allows tumor growth and spread. Extensive experience with the immunomodulatory monoclonal antibody ipilimumab has demonstrated that unique responses may be seen with immunotherapies that are not adequately captured by traditional response criteria such as the World Health Organization criteria and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Consequently, several modified criteria have been developed to evaluate patients treated with immunotherapy, including immune-related response criteria, immune-related RECIST, and immune RECIST. Finally, patients undergoing immunotherapy may develop a wide variety of immune-related adverse events with which the radiologist must be familiar. In this article, we present the fundamental concepts behind immunotherapy, specific agents currently approved for the treatment of lung cancer, and immune-related adverse events. The role of imaging in the evaluation of these patients will also be discussed, including the general principles of treatment response evaluation, specific response criteria adopted with these agents, including immune-related response criteria, immune-related RECIST, and immune RECIST, and the imaging of immune-related adverse events.

[1]  Axel Hoos,et al.  Guidelines for the Evaluation of Immune Therapy Activity in Solid Tumors: Immune-Related Response Criteria , 2009, Clinical Cancer Research.

[2]  A. Giobbie-Hurder,et al.  Developing a Common Language for Tumor Response to Immunotherapy: Immune-Related Response Criteria Using Unidimensional Measurements , 2013, Clinical Cancer Research.

[3]  V. Sondak,et al.  The Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer consensus statement on tumour immunotherapy for the treatment of cutaneous melanoma , 2013, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[4]  J. Schneck,et al.  Adoptive T Cell Immunotherapy for Cancer , 2015, Rambam Maimonides medical journal.

[5]  C. Berking,et al.  The Price of Tumor Control: An Analysis of Rare Side Effects of Anti-CTLA-4 Therapy in Metastatic Melanoma from the Ipilimumab Network , 2013, PloS one.

[6]  R. Kircheis,et al.  Cancer immunotherapy , 2006, Biotechnology journal.

[7]  M. Okada,et al.  [New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours-revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)]. , 2009, Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy.

[8]  A. D. Van den Abbeele,et al.  Cancer immunotherapy: imaging assessment of novel treatment response patterns and immune-related adverse events. , 2015, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[9]  J. Wolchok,et al.  Evaluation of Immune-Related Response Criteria and RECIST v1.1 in Patients With Advanced Melanoma Treated With Pembrolizumab. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  Keunchil Park,et al.  Atezolizumab versus docetaxel for patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (POPLAR): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 randomised controlled trial , 2016, The Lancet.

[11]  J. Ahn,et al.  Pembrolizumab for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer , 2016, Expert opinion on biological therapy.

[12]  Y. Doki,et al.  A phase I study of vaccination with NY‐ESO‐1f peptide mixed with Picibanil OK‐432 and Montanide ISA‐51 in patients with cancers expressing the NY‐ESO‐1 antigen , 2011, International journal of cancer.

[13]  Lindsey A. Torre,et al.  Cancer Facts and Figures for Hispanics/Latinos 2015-2017 , 1905 .

[14]  P. Fisher,et al.  Therapeutic cancer vaccines: past, present, and future. , 2013, Advances in cancer research.

[15]  J. Wolchok,et al.  Ipilimumab: Developmental History, Clinical Considerations, and Future Perspectives , 2012 .

[16]  S. Tirumani,et al.  Ipilimumab associated hepatitis: imaging and clinicopathologic findings , 2013, Investigational New Drugs.

[17]  Myke R. Green,et al.  Management of toxicities associated with high-dose interleukin-2 and biochemotherapy , 2013, Anti-cancer drugs.

[18]  Seongseok Yun,et al.  Late Onset Ipilimumab-Induced Pericarditis and Pericardial Effusion: A Rare but Life Threatening Complication , 2015, Case reports in oncological medicine.

[19]  C. Rudin,et al.  Pneumonitis in Patients Treated With Anti-Programmed Death-1/Programmed Death Ligand 1 Therapy. , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[20]  Antoni Ribas,et al.  Safety and tumor responses with lambrolizumab (anti-PD-1) in melanoma. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  A. D. Van den Abbeele,et al.  Pancreatitis Secondary to Anti-Programmed Death Receptor 1 Immunotherapy Diagnosed by FDG PET/CT. , 2015, Clinical nuclear medicine.

[22]  J. Seidman,et al.  Fulminant Myocarditis with Combination Immune Checkpoint Blockade. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  S. Rosenberg,et al.  Autoimmunity correlates with tumor regression in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  Axel Hoos,et al.  Classification of current anticancer immunotherapies , 2014, Oncotarget.

[25]  Antoni Ribas,et al.  Anti-programmed-death-receptor-1 treatment with pembrolizumab in ipilimumab-refractory advanced melanoma: a randomised dose-comparison cohort of a phase 1 trial , 2014, The Lancet.

[26]  J. Wolchok,et al.  Opportunistic infections in patients treated with immunotherapy for cancer , 2014, Journal of Immunotherapy for Cancer.

[27]  Isabelle Boutron,et al.  Reporting of safety results in published reports of randomized controlled trials. , 2009, Archives of internal medicine.

[28]  H. Kaufman,et al.  Erratum: Oncolytic viruses: a new class of immunotherapy drugs , 2016, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[29]  Carlos Barrios,et al.  Atezolizumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (OAK): a phase 3, open-label, multicentre randomised controlled trial , 2017, The Lancet.

[30]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Completeness of safety reporting in randomized trials: an evaluation of 7 medical areas. , 2001, JAMA.

[31]  Robert Ford,et al.  iRECIST: guidelines for response criteria for use in trials testing immunotherapeutics. , 2017, The Lancet. Oncology.

[32]  F. Hodi,et al.  Cancer immunotherapy and immune-related response assessment: The role of radiologists in the new arena of cancer treatment. , 2015, European journal of radiology.

[33]  A. Shinagare,et al.  Ipilimumab-associated colitis: CT findings. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[34]  F. Hodi,et al.  Radiologic aspects of immune-related tumor response criteria and patterns of immune-related adverse events in patients undergoing ipilimumab therapy. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[35]  M. Christian,et al.  [New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors]. , 2000, Bulletin du cancer.

[36]  B. Kolla,et al.  Recurrent pleural effusions and cardiac tamponade as possible manifestations of pseudoprogression associated with nivolumab therapy– a report of two cases , 2016, Journal of Immunotherapy for Cancer.

[37]  Axel Hoos,et al.  Ipilimumab plus dacarbazine for previously untreated metastatic melanoma. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[38]  Drew M. Pardoll,et al.  The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy , 2012, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[39]  D. Schadendorf,et al.  Nivolumab in previously untreated melanoma without BRAF mutation. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[40]  R. Herbst,et al.  Immunotherapy in Lung Cancer. , 2017, Hematology/oncology clinics of North America.

[41]  J. Kirkwood,et al.  Immunotherapy for advanced melanoma: fulfilling the promise. , 2013, Cancer treatment reviews.

[42]  N. Popitsch,et al.  CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1 Blockade: New Immunotherapeutic Modalities with Durable Clinical Benefit in Melanoma Patients , 2013, Clinical Cancer Research.

[43]  W. Oh,et al.  Adverse event reporting in cancer clinical trial publications. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[44]  C. June,et al.  Adoptive T cell therapy for cancer in the clinic. , 2007, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[45]  E. Chen,et al.  Adherence to CONSORT adverse event reporting guidelines in randomized clinical trials evaluating systemic cancer therapy: a systematic review. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[46]  C. Ng,et al.  Radiologic manifestations of immune-related adverse events in patients with metastatic melanoma undergoing anti-CTLA-4 antibody therapy. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[47]  C. Rudin,et al.  Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[48]  R. Dummer,et al.  Patterns of onset and resolution of immune‐related adverse events of special interest with ipilimumab , 2013, Cancer.

[49]  S. Rosenberg,et al.  CTLA-4 Blockade with Ipilimumab: Long-term Follow-up of 177 Patients with Metastatic Melanoma , 2012, Clinical Cancer Research.

[50]  John A Thompson,et al.  Treatment of metastatic melanoma: an overview. , 2009, Oncology.

[51]  S. Nolte,et al.  Population-based benefits of skin cancer screening , 2012 .

[52]  Percy Ivy,et al.  Defining dose-limiting toxicity for phase 1 trials of molecularly targeted agents: results of a DLT-TARGETT international survey. , 2014, European journal of cancer.

[53]  Nivolumab approved for lung cancer. , 2015, Cancer discovery.

[54]  David C. Smith,et al.  Overall Survival and Long-Term Safety of Nivolumab (Anti-Programmed Death 1 Antibody, BMS-936558, ONO-4538) in Patients With Previously Treated Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[55]  C. Breitbach,et al.  Going viral with cancer immunotherapy , 2014, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[56]  Y. Shentu,et al.  Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-010): a randomised controlled trial , 2016, The Lancet.

[57]  F. Cappuzzo,et al.  Activity and safety of nivolumab, an anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor, for patients with advanced, refractory squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (CheckMate 063): a phase 2, single-arm trial. , 2015, The Lancet. Oncology.

[58]  L. Crinò,et al.  Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Squamous-Cell Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[59]  D. Schadendorf,et al.  Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[60]  G. Linette,et al.  Nivolumab versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma who progressed after anti-CTLA-4 treatment (CheckMate 037): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. , 2015, The Lancet. Oncology.

[61]  George Coukos,et al.  Cancer immunotherapy comes of age , 2011, Nature.