Primary prevention of ovarian cancer.

Ovarian cancer remains the deadliest gynecologic malignancy in the United States, killing more women each year than cervical and endometrial cancers combined. Despite aggressive operations and intensive chemotherapy, the 5-year survival rate is less than 40%. 1 Complications such as bowel obstruction, inanition, ascites, and pleural effusions can make this a wretched way to die. Hence, the finding of Hankinson et al 2 in this issue of JAMA is heartening: tubal sterilization may protect against this malignancy. See also p 2813. The Nurses' Health Study is not the first to observe this protection. 3-5 The importance of this research, however, stems from its design: a large, prospective cohort study. Cohort studies avoid some of the vexing problems of case-control studies, such as selection of an appropriate control group. Ascertainment bias is unlikely to have accounted for these results. The respondents were knowledgeable health professionals, and medical records confirmed reported illness. While

[1]  C. Amos,et al.  Genetic epidemiology of epithelial ovarian cancer , 2010, Cancer.

[2]  R Yancik,et al.  Ovarian cancer. Age contrasts in incidence, histology, disease stage at diagnosis, and mortality. , 1993, Cancer.

[3]  W. Willett,et al.  Tubal Ligation, Hysterectomy, and Risk of Ovarian Cancer: A Prospective Study , 1993 .

[4]  J. Peipert,et al.  Oral Contraceptive Risk Assessment: A Survey of 247 Educated Women , 1993, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[5]  D. Grimes,et al.  Technology follies. The uncritical acceptance of medical innovation. , 1993, JAMA.

[6]  C. Johannes,et al.  Re: "Characteristics relating to ovarian cancer risk: collaborative analysis of 12 US case-control studies. II. Invasive epithelial ovarian cancers in white women". , 1993, American journal of epidemiology.

[7]  F. Speizer,et al.  A retrospective cohort study of vasectomy and prostate cancer in US men. , 1993, JAMA.

[8]  K. Kerlikowske,et al.  Should women with familial ovarian cancer undergo prophylactic oophorectomy? , 1992, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[9]  G. Anderson,et al.  Tubal sterilization and risk of subsequent hospital admission for menstrual disorders. , 1992, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  D. Grimes The safety of oral contraceptives: epidemiologic insights from the first 30 years. , 1992, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  P. Darney,et al.  A Clinical Guide for Contraception , 1992 .

[12]  N. Weiss,et al.  Tubal sterilization, hysterectomy, and the subsequent occurrence of epithelial ovarian cancer. , 1991, American journal of epidemiology.

[13]  W. Mosher Contraceptive practice in the United States, 1982-1988. , 1990, Family planning perspectives.

[14]  U. P. S. T. Force,et al.  Guide to clinical preventive services : an assessment of the effectiveness of 169 interventions : report of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force , 1989 .

[15]  B. Henderson,et al.  Reproductive, genetic, and dietary risk factors for ovarian cancer. , 1988, American journal of epidemiology.

[16]  P. Wingo,et al.  Systemic lupus erythematosus and reproductive function: a case-control study. , 1985, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[17]  M G Hammond,et al.  Retrograde menstruation in healthy women and in patients with endometriosis. , 1984, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[18]  G. Huggins,et al.  Complications of female sterilization: immediate and delayed. , 1984, Fertility and sterility.