Chapter 19 – Biomarkers

Regenerative medicine is a new area of translational science that comprises different emerging technologies such as nanotechnology, innovative biomaterials, genetic engineering, and cellular therapeutics. While potential clinical indications as well as the market size are huge, any application still needs to prove that its clinical efficacy and its deployment are sustainable. In the context of translational regenerative medicine, biomarkers not only characterize the function, quality, and safety/toxicity of a product (potency) but also help identify those patients or cohorts who would most likely benefit from such an innovative treatment modality (prediction or stratification) and allow efficacy in those patients who have been identified as responders to be monitored. This is of pivotal importance for the development of drugs or drug candidates that have not yet been approved to foster the early decision on how to go forward and where to stop the development of less promising compounds or technologies. Diverse and numerous technologies to identify and measure biomarkers are currently available. The “omics” platforms, modern imaging technologies, and other technologies can be used as tools to measure many biomarkers in vivo and ex vivo. Intelligent clinical trial design is another valuable tool to validate and deploy biomarkers and to accelerate cost-saving drug development, in particular in regenerative medicine.

[1]  Randall T Moon,et al.  Advances in signaling in vertebrate regeneration as a prelude to regenerative medicine. , 2007, Genes & development.

[2]  M. Verma,et al.  Genetic and epigenetic biomarkers in cancer diagnosis and identifying high risk populations. , 2006, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[3]  D. Prockop,et al.  Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. , 2006, Cytotherapy.

[4]  K. Strimbu,et al.  What are biomarkers? , 2010, Current opinion in HIV and AIDS.

[5]  J. Jen,et al.  Distinguishing second primary tumors from lung metastases in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. , 1998, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[6]  M. Dimopoulos,et al.  High levels of serum TIMP-1 correlate with advanced disease and predict for poor survival in patients with multiple myeloma treated with novel agents. , 2010, Leukemia research.

[7]  R. Ramasamy,et al.  The role of mesenchymal stem cells in haemopoiesis. , 2006, Blood reviews.

[8]  Andreas Radbruch,et al.  Does gene expression analysis inform us in rheumatoid arthritis? , 2009, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[9]  J. Tabernero,et al.  BRAF as a target for cancer therapy. , 2011, Anti-cancer agents in medicinal chemistry.

[10]  C. Price,et al.  Effects of niobium filtration and constant potential on the sensitometric responses of dental radiographic films. , 1991, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[11]  Z. Tezak,et al.  US FDA and personalized medicine: in vitro diagnostic regulatory perspective. , 2010, Personalized medicine.

[12]  P. Bianco,et al.  Multipotential cells in the bone marrow stroma: regulation in the context of organ physiology. , 1999, Critical reviews in eukaryotic gene expression.

[13]  Mukesh Verma,et al.  Cancer Biomarkers: Are We Ready for the Prime Time? , 2010, Cancers.

[14]  C. Sawyers The cancer biomarker problem , 2008, Nature.

[15]  J. Schneider,et al.  Economics of cancer biomarkers. , 2012, Personalized medicine.

[16]  S. Badylak,et al.  A perivascular origin for mesenchymal stem cells in multiple human organs. , 2008, Cell stem cell.

[17]  Christopher H Allan,et al.  Mammalian regeneration and regenerative medicine. , 2008, Birth defects research. Part C, Embryo today : reviews.

[18]  A. Riazi,et al.  Stem cell sources for regenerative medicine. , 2009, Methods in molecular biology.