Configuration Control and Recalibration of a New Reconfigurable Robot

The advantages of reconfigurable robots have been discussed in the specialized literature. Conventionally, reconfigurability was a direct result of using modular joints. In this paper we discuss the configuration control and recalibration of a different class of reconfigurable robots, one which is equipped with lockable cylindrical joints with no actuators or sensors. Such a robot can be as versatile and agile as a hyper-redundant manipulator, but with a simpler, more compact, lighter design. A passive joint becomes controllable when the robot forms a closed kinematic chain and the joint lock is released. After reconfiguration, the values of the passive joints are computed from the value of the active joints using inverse kinematics of the closed chain. That problem is solved using a globally uniformly asymptotically stable scheme based on closed-loop inverse kinematics (CLIK). An asymptotically stable reconfiguration controller is also devised that takes the robot from one configuration to another by directly regulating the values of the passive joints. The controller has a rather simple structure, which only relies on the robot gravity and kinematics models. Conditions for the observability and the controllability of the passive joints are also derived in detail, and some numerical results are reported.

[1]  W. Wolovich,et al.  A computational technique for inverse kinematics , 1984, The 23rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[2]  Farhad Aghili,et al.  A unified approach for inverse and direct dynamics of constrained multibody systems based on linear projection operator: applications to control and simulation , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[3]  H. Kurokawa,et al.  Self-assembling machine , 1994, Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[4]  Farhad Aghili,et al.  Design of a Reconfigurable Space Robot with Lockable Telescopic Joints , 2006, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[5]  Arthur C. Sanderson,et al.  Tetrobot: A Modular Approach to Reconfigurable Parallel Robotics , 1997 .

[6]  Wei-Min Shen,et al.  Highly compliant and self-tightening docking modules for precise and fast connection of self-reconfigurable robots , 2003, 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.03CH37422).

[7]  Shane Farritor,et al.  A systems-level modular design approach to field robotics , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[8]  Bruno Siciliano,et al.  Closed-Loop Inverse Kinematics Schemes for Constrained Redundant Manipulators with Task Space Augmentation and Task Priority Strategy , 1991, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[9]  Craig D. McGray,et al.  The self-reconfiguring robotic molecule , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.98CH36146).

[10]  Jorge Angeles,et al.  Fundamentals of Robotic Mechanical Systems , 2008 .

[11]  Marsette Vona,et al.  A basis for self-reconfiguring robots using crystal modules , 2000, Proceedings. 2000 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2000) (Cat. No.00CH37113).

[12]  Jorge Angeles,et al.  Fundamentals of Robotic Mechanical Systems: Theory, Methods, and Algorithms , 1995 .

[13]  Eiichi Yoshida,et al.  Micro Self-Reconfigurable Robotic System using Shape Memory Alloy , 2000, DARS.

[14]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Matrix computations , 1983 .

[15]  Christiaan J. J. Paredis,et al.  Design of modular fault tolerant manipulators , 1995 .

[16]  A. Castano,et al.  The Conro modules for reconfigurable robots , 2002 .

[17]  Toshio Fukuda,et al.  Cellular robotic system (CEBOT) as one of the realization of self-organizing intelligent universal manipulator , 1990, Proceedings., IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.