Assessing the Validity of the Dynamic Gait Index in a Balance Disorders Clinic: An Application of Rasch Analysis

Background The Dynamic Gait Index (DGI) has emerged as a valid indicator of functional gait abilities for people with balance and vestibular disorders. Recent Rasch-based analyses have indicated possible concerns for multidimensionality and a ceiling effect within the DGI. Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the DGI in a sample of patients from a dizziness and balance clinic to determine whether patient features such as dizziness or fall history influence the measurement characteristics of the DGI. Design This study used a retrospective design. Methods A sample of 117 patients' charts was reviewed, and patients were grouped according to a primary impairment of dizziness only or imbalance and were categorized based on a history of falls. A one-parameter Rasch-Andrich rating scale model was used with thorough analyses, including rating scale analysis, item-difficulty hierarchy, scale unidimensionality, and differential item functioning (DIF). Results The DGI demonstrated an effective rating scale design and was found to be a unidimensional measurement of dynamic gait. The DGI displayed a modest ceiling effect, primarily with patients with higher functional levels displaying symptoms of dizziness. Three items (“vertical head nods,” “gait on level surface,” and “stepping over obstacles”) demonstrated DIF based on categories of patient characteristics, although the effects on measurement were negligible. Limitations Functional categories were based on impairments and not underlying medical diagnoses derived from a retrospective chart review, whereas the limited sample size may have underestimated statistically significant DIF. Conclusions Results from this study offer additional evidence supporting the validity of the DGI as a measure of gait ability. The present findings also are in agreement with prior research that has shown a ceiling effect for the DGI in people with balance or vestibular disorders. Effects of DIF were found to be negligible, yet the presence of DIF within the present sample helped to explain some differences in DGI item-difficulty hierarchies from prior studies. Continued research is needed to determine how population differences may affect performance on the DGI and to develop and test assessments capable of measuring a broader range of gait abilities.

[1]  Second Edition,et al.  Statistical Package for the Social Sciences , 1970 .

[2]  S. Herdman,et al.  Reliability of Clinical Measures Used to with Peripheral Vestibular Disorders , 2006, Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT.

[3]  D. Wrisley,et al.  Reliability, internal consistency, and validity of data obtained with the functional gait assessment. , 2004, Physical therapy.

[4]  Karen Draney,et al.  Objective measurement : theory into practice , 1992 .

[5]  F. Tower The dynamic gait index relates to self-reported fall history in individuals with vestibular dysfunction , 2000 .

[6]  M. Walker,et al.  Reference Group Data for the Functional Gait Assessment , 2007, Physical Therapy.

[7]  J M Linacre,et al.  Investigating rating scale category utility. , 1999, Journal of outcome measurement.

[8]  Michael Greatorex,et al.  Statistical Package for the Social Sciences , 2015 .

[9]  Elisabeth Hathaway Research in Occupational Therapy , 1974 .

[10]  J. Duysens,et al.  Advancing age progressively affects obstacle avoidance skills in the elderly. , 2005, Human movement science.

[11]  Martha L Walker,et al.  Reliability of the dynamic gait index in people with vestibular disorders. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[12]  Michael Koller,et al.  A simulation study provided sample size guidance for differential item functioning (DIF) studies using short scales. , 2009, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[13]  B. Wright Reasonable mean-square fit values , 1994 .

[14]  Cherdsak Iramaneerat,et al.  An Introduction to Rasch Measurement , 2008 .

[15]  Lucy Yardley,et al.  Clinical Disorders of Balance, Posture and Gait , 1996 .

[16]  Lucy Yardley,et al.  Rehabilitation of balance disorders in the patient with vestibular pathology , 2004 .

[17]  Antonio Nardone,et al.  Using psychometric techniques to improve the Balance Evaluation Systems Test: the mini-BESTest. , 2010, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[18]  J. Linacre Detecting multidimensionality: which residual data-type works best? , 1998, Journal of outcome measurement.

[19]  S. Whitney,et al.  The dynamic gait index relates to self-reported fall history in individuals with vestibular dysfunction. , 2000, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[20]  Y. Wang,et al.  Utilizing Rasch measurement models to develop a computer adaptive self-report of walking, climbing, and running , 2008, Disability and rehabilitation.

[21]  Natalie A de Morton,et al.  Application of Rasch analysis in health care is increasing and is applied for variable reasons in mobility instruments. , 2010, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[22]  M. Badke,et al.  Outcomes after rehabilitation for adults with balance dysfunction. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[23]  Susan L Whitney,et al.  Construction and Validation of the 4-Item Dynamic Gait Index , 2006, Physical Therapy.

[24]  Yi-Po Chiu,et al.  Use of item response analysis to investigate measurement properties and clinical validity of data for the dynamic gait index. , 2006, Physical therapy.

[25]  Richard M. Smith Detecting item bias with the Rasch model. , 2004, Journal of applied measurement.

[26]  C. Sherbourne,et al.  The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. , 1994 .

[27]  Graeme Hutcheson,et al.  Rasch Models for Measurement , 2011 .

[28]  Cross-regional validation of the School Version of the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills. , 2010, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[29]  Luigi Tesio,et al.  Measuring behaviours and perceptions: Rasch analysis as a tool for rehabilitation research. , 2003, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[30]  Everett V. Smith Detecting and evaluating the impact of multidimensionality using item fit statistics and principal component analysis of residuals. , 2002, Journal of applied measurement.

[31]  C. Granger,et al.  The structure and stability of the Functional Independence Measure. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[32]  M. Bishop,et al.  Improved Fall-Related Efficacy in Older Adults Related to Changes in Dynamic Gait Ability , 2010, Physical Therapy.

[33]  Marjorie H. Woollacott,et al.  Motor Control: Theory and Practical Applications , 1995 .

[34]  M. R. Espejo Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences , 2004 .