A considerable amount of perceptual research within the general framework of behavioral psychology has been conducted by cartographers during the last ten or fifteen years. However, as one reviews the findings of this research in connection with problems encountered during the normal process of making maps, it doesn't seem to add up to much. No whole theory or set of principles, greater than the sum of the small component parts, has emerged. Similarly, analytical attempts to deal with the notion of map reading have not led to any theoretical structures from which principles that would assist in the details of map design can be deduced. Clearly, map reading is more than just the cumulation of a number of simple perceptual com parisons of symbol size or value. Perhaps it is time, in recognition of this fact, to shift our thinking from the details of empirical research, from psychophysical studies, etc., to a concern with the broader assumptions that underlie the conduct of such research, and to the possibility that certain shifts in those basic assump tions might be of some value to cartography. Whitehead has characterized science as, "the union of passionate interest in the detailed facts with equal devotion to abstract generalization." We need to be concerned always with both levels of research activity.
[1]
Y. Tuan.
IMAGES AND MENTAL MAPS
,
1975
.
[2]
Prostitution In Nevada,et al.
ANNALS of the Association of American Geographers
,
1974
.
[3]
E. Woolmington.
Image and Environment: Cognitive Mapping and Spatial Behaviour, R.M. Downs and D. Stea (eds), Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago, 1973. 160 x 240 mm., xxiv and 439 pages (with index), 36 tables, 117 figures. $15.00.
,
1976
.
[4]
Bertrand Russell,et al.
Our Knowledge of the External World as a Field for Scientific Method in Philosophy
,
1914
.
[5]
J. Wohlwill.
Image and Environment. Cognitive Mapping and Spatial Behavior. Roger M. Downs and David Stea, Eds. Aldine, Chicago, 1973. xxiii, 440 pp., illus. $15
,
1974
.