Using learning styles theory in engineering education

Studies have shown that, while learning different concepts, people sometimes take different approaches (learning styles). Accordingly, their performance reflected differently in their academic studies. With the effect of globalisation to the educational environments, the influence of individual learning styles on educational performance is getting more significant. In this study, a learning style assessment tool was used to examine the relationship between students’ learning styles and their performance in engineering education programmes. At the beginning of the programme, 285 students’ learning styles were measured using a learning style assessment tool. Four years after the engineering education, their performance in the programme was compared with their individual learning styles. This study shows that most of the students are assimilators. Divergers and convergers follow the assimilators. The number of accommodators is very limited. The relationship between engineering students’ learning styles and their performance is found: assimilators and convergers performed better than the divergers and accommodators. The performance difference between assimilators and divergers is statistically significant. The results of this study show that the learning style theory is a potential tool for guiding the design and improvement of courses and helping students to improve their individual performance.

[1]  Mahnaz Moallem,et al.  Applying Constructivist and Objectivist Learning Theories in the Design of A Web-Based Course: Implications for Practice , 2001, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[2]  R. Neumann.  Disciplinary Differences and University Teaching , 2001 .

[3]  Lenda Cook,et al.  LEARNING STYLE AWARENESS AND ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AMONG COMMUNITY COLLEGE STUDENTS , 1991 .

[4]  R. Felder,et al.  Understanding Student Differences , 2005 .

[5]  Lars Fallan.  Quality Reform: Personality type, preferred learning style and majors in a business school , 2006 .

[6]  P. Rosati,et al.  A study of the relationship between students' learning styles and instructors' lecture styles , 1988 .

[7]  Virginia A. Baldwin,et al.  Learning Styles: Teaching Technology Subjects Can Be More Effective. , 2001 .

[8]  Jaana Holvikivi,et al.  Learning styles in engineering education: the quest to improve didactic practices , 2007 .

[9]  R. Felder,et al.  The Effects of Personality Type on Engineering Student Performance and Attitudes , 2002 .

[10]  Linda Price,et al.  Individual Differences in Learning: Cognitive control, cognitive style, and learning style , 2004 .

[11]  Richard M. Felder,et al.  The Future of Engineering Education: Part 2. Teaching Methods That Work. , 2000 .

[12]  J. E. Sharp.  Teaching teamwork communication with Kolb learning style theory , 2001, 31st Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Impact on Engineering and Science Education. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37193).

[13]  Richard M. Felder,et al.  MATTERS OF STYLE , 2004 .

[14]  Juan E. Gilbert,et al.  Adapting instruction in search of 'a significant difference' , 1999, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[15]  D. Kolb.  Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development , 1983 .

[16]  D. Nulty,et al.  Transitions in Students' Learning Styles. , 1996 .

[17]  Teresa Larkin-Hein,et al.  Research on learning style: applications in the physics and engineering classrooms , 2001, IEEE Trans. Educ..

[18]  L. Baldwin,et al.  Learning styles for interactive learning systems , 2003 .

[19]  Dorothy Fuller,et al.  Internet Teaching By Style: Profiling the On-line Professor , 2000, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[20]  Xin Guo,et al.  The Influence of Business Case Studies and Learning Styles in an Accounting Course: A Comment , 2008 .

[21]  D. Kolb.  Management and the Learning Process , 1976 .

[22]  Julie E. Mills,et al.  Engineering Education, Is Problem-Based or Project-Based Learning the Answer , 2003 .

[23]  L Sutcliffe,et al.  An investigation into whether nurses change their learning style according to subject area studied. , 1993, Journal of advanced nursing.

[24]  N. Dixon,et al.  The Kolb Model Modified for Classroom Activities , 1987 .

[25]  Richard M. Felder,et al.  THE FUTURE OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION II. TEACHING METHODS THAT WORK , 2000 .

[26]  Tony Becher,et al.  Teaching and Learning in their Disciplinary Contexts: A conceptual analysis , 2002 .

[27]  B. Heffler.  Individual Learning Style and the Learning Style Inventory , 2001 .

[28]  Curtis A. Carver,et al.  Enhancing student learning through hypermedia courseware and incorporation of student learning styles , 1999 .

[29]  Kouider Mokhtari,et al.  ARE STUDENTS' LEARNING STYLES DISCIPLINE SPECIFIC? , 2003 .

[30]  H. Pillay.  An investigation of the effect of individual cognitive preferences on learning through computer-based instruction , 1998 .

[31]  Monique Osborn,et al.  Innovative Approaches To First Year Engineering Education , 2002 .

[32]  Nidia Pavan Kuri.  Kolb's Learning Cycle: An Alternative Strategy for Engineering Education. , 2000 .

[33]  R. Felder,et al.  Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education. , 1988 .

[34]  Palitha Edirisingha,et al.  Learning and e‐learning in HE: the relationship between student learning style and VLE use , 2007 .

[35]  John N. Harb,et al.  Using learning style theory to improve learning and teaching in the engineering classroom , 1993, Proceedings of IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference - FIE '93.

[36]  KOLB Öğrenme Stili Envanteri , 1993 .

[37]  Bülent Güven,et al.  DEVELOPING LEARNING STYLE INVENTORY FOR EFFECTIVE INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN , 2007 .

[38]  Lorne Olfman,et al.  The Importance of Learning Style in End-User Training , 1990, MIS Q..