’Knowing me, knowing you’ — Using profiles and social networking to improve recommender systems

The Internet has not only brought us more information and choice, but has also increased the burden of making a choice. Recommender systems aim to address this problem by providing personalised recommendations in areas such as music, films or books. Research on recommender systems has focused on improving the matching algorithms. The research presented in this paper takes a user-centred approach. Since recommendations are usually presented as lists of items, without explanations or justifications, users struggle to find out how appropriate recommendations are for them. Our research has shown that the relationship between advice-seeker and recommender is extremely important, so ways of indicating social closeness and taste overlap are required. We thus suggest that drawing on similarity and familiarity between the user and the persons who have rated the items can aid judgement and decision making. This was tested in an experiment, which carefully controlled familiarity, profile similarity and rating-overlap between the user and those rating items. The results help us understand the decision-making processes in an on-line context, and form the basis of a usercentred recommender system approach. We suggest that recommender systems can be improved by combining the benefits of social networking applications — such as explicit networks of trust — with the matching capabilities of recommender systems.

[1]  John F. Canny,et al.  Collaborative filtering with privacy via factor analysis , 2002, SIGIR '02.

[2]  Noam Chomsky Language and thought , 1993 .

[3]  U. Flick An Introduction to Qualitative Research , 1998 .

[4]  Rashmi R. Sinha,et al.  Comparing Recommendations Made by Online Systems and Friends , 2001, DELOS.

[5]  Edward A. Fox,et al.  A Connection-Centric Survey of Recommender Systems Research , 2002, ArXiv.

[6]  Barry Smyth,et al.  Trust in recommender systems , 2005, IUI.

[7]  P. Briggs,et al.  Trust in Online Advice , 2002 .

[8]  N. Harvey,et al.  Taking Advice: Accepting Help, Improving Judgment, and Sharing Responsibility☆☆☆ , 1997 .

[9]  M. Angela Sasse,et al.  "I thought it was terrible and everyone else loved it" - A New Perspective for Effective Recommender System Design , 2005, BCS HCI.

[10]  Edward A. Fox,et al.  Recommender Systems Research: A Connection-Centric Survey , 2004, Journal of Intelligent Information Systems.

[11]  Judith Donath,et al.  Public Displays of Connection , 2004 .

[12]  John Riedl,et al.  Explaining collaborative filtering recommendations , 2000, CSCW '00.

[13]  Yaniv,et al.  Advice Taking in Decision Making: Egocentric Discounting and Reputation Formation. , 2000, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[14]  Paolo Avesani,et al.  Trust-Aware Collaborative Filtering for Recommender Systems , 2004, CoopIS/DOA/ODBASE.

[15]  M. Angela Sasse,et al.  Accounting for taste: using profile similarity to improve recommender systems , 2006, CHI.

[16]  H. Reis,et al.  Attraction and close relationships. , 1998 .

[17]  Ilan Yaniv,et al.  The Benefit of Additional Opinions , 2004 .

[18]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[19]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Fast and frugal heuristics: The tools of bounded rationality , 2004 .

[20]  David Heckerman,et al.  Empirical Analysis of Predictive Algorithms for Collaborative Filtering , 1998, UAI.

[21]  Jens Riegelsberger,et al.  The mechanics of trust: A framework for research and design , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[22]  John Riedl,et al.  Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms , 2001, WWW '01.

[23]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Profiles as Conversation: Networked Identity Performance on Friendster , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[24]  Ilan Yaniv,et al.  Receiving Other People's Advice: Influence and Benefit , 2004 .