Women are more strongly affected by dizziness in static magnetic fields of magnetic resonance imaging scanners

Increasing field strengths in MRI necessitate the examination of potential side effects. Previously reported results have been contradictory, possibly caused by imbalanced samples. We aimed to examine whether special groups of people are more prone to develop side effects that might have led to contradictory results in previous studies. We examined the occurrence of sensory side effects in static magnetic fields of MRI scanners of 1.5, 3, and 7 T and a mock scanner in 41 healthy participants. The contribution of field strength, sex, age, and attention to bodily processes, and stress hormone levels to the sensation of dizziness was examined in separate univariate analyses and in a joint analysis that included all variables. Field strength and sex were significant factors in the joint analysis (P=0.001), with women being more strongly affected than men by dizziness in higher static magnetic fields. This effect was not mediated by the other variables such as attention to bodily symptoms or stress hormones. Further research needs to elucidate the underlying factors of increased dizziness in women in static magnetic fields in MRI. We hypothesize that imbalanced samples of earlier studies might be one reason for previous contradictory results on the side effects of static magnetic fields.

[1]  A. Meyer-Lindenberg,et al.  A cross-over study of effects on the hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis and the sympathoadrenergic system in magnetic field strength exposure from 0 to 7 T , 2013, Stress.

[2]  Wolfhard Semmler,et al.  Cognition and sensation in very high static magnetic fields: a randomized case-crossover study with different field strengths. , 2013, Radiology.

[3]  Jöran Lepsien,et al.  Investigation of higher‐order cognitive functions during exposure to a high static magnetic field , 2012, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[4]  Wolfhard Semmler,et al.  Effects of static magnetic fields on cognition, vital signs, and sensory perception: A meta‐analysis , 2011, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[5]  Hans Kromhout,et al.  Exposure, health complaints and cognitive performance among employees of an MRI scanners manufacturing department , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[6]  Hans Kromhout,et al.  Neurobehavioral effects among subjects exposed to high static and gradient magnetic fields from a 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging system—A case‐crossover pilot study , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  A. Kangarlu,et al.  Randomized comparison of cognitive function in humans at 0 and 8 Tesla , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[8]  Alayar Kangarlu,et al.  Effect of static magnetic field exposure of up to 8 Tesla on sequential human vital sign measurements , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[9]  W. Rief,et al.  Somatization Symptoms and Hypochondriacal Features in the General Population , 2001, Psychosomatic medicine.

[10]  W. Rief,et al.  Toward empirically based criteria for the classification of somatoform disorders. , 1999, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[11]  C L Dumoulin,et al.  Human exposure to 4.0-Tesla magnetic fields in a whole-body scanner. , 1992, Medical physics.