Exploring Collections of Tagged Text for Literary Scholarship

Modern literary scholars must combine access to vast collections of text with the traditional close analysis of their field. In this paper, we discuss the design and development of tools to support this work. Based on analysis of the needs of literary scholars, we constructed a suite of visualization tools for the analysis of large collections of tagged text (i.e. text where one or more words have been annotated as belonging to a specific category). These tools unite the aspects of the scholars’ work: large scale overview tools help to identify corpus‐wide statistical patterns while fine scale analysis tools assist in finding specific details that support these observations. We designed visual tools that support and integrate these levels of analysis. The result is the first tool suite that can support the multilevel text analysis performed by scholars, combining standard visual elements with novel methods for selecting individual texts and identifying represenative passages in them.

[1]  M. Sheelagh T. Carpendale,et al.  DocuBurst: Visualizing Document Content using Language Structure , 2009, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[2]  Lucy T. Nowell,et al.  ThemeRiver: visualizing theme changes over time , 2000, IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization 2000. INFOVIS 2000. Proceedings.

[3]  Martin Wattenberg,et al.  Parallel Tag Clouds to explore and analyze faceted text corpora , 2009, 2009 IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology.

[4]  Catherine Plaisant,et al.  The Story of One: Humanity scholarship with visualization and text analysis , 2008 .

[5]  John T. Stasko,et al.  Jigsaw: Supporting Investigative Analysis through Interactive Visualization , 2007, 2007 IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology.

[6]  Stephen Ramsay,et al.  Reading Machines: Toward an Algorithmic Criticism , 2011 .

[7]  James J. Thomas,et al.  Visualizing the non-visual: spatial analysis and interaction with information from text documents , 1995, Proceedings of Visualization 1995 Conference.

[8]  Thomas Ball,et al.  Software Visualization in the Large , 1996, Computer.

[9]  Steven P. Reiss,et al.  Stretching the rubber sheet: a metaphor for viewing large layouts on small screens , 1993, UIST '93.

[10]  Stephen Ramsay.  Special Section: Reconceiving Text Analysis: Toward an Algorithmic Criticism , 2003, Lit. Linguistic Comput..

[11]  John Stasko,et al.  Jigsaw: supporting investigative analysis through interactive visualization , 2008 .

[12]  Jimeng Sun,et al.  FacetAtlas: Multifaceted Visualization for Rich Text Corpora , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[13]  David Borland,et al.  Rainbow Color Map (Still) Considered Harmful , 2007, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[14]  Jonathan Hope,et al.  The Hundredth Psalm to the Tune of "Green Sleeves": Digital Approaches to Shakespeare's Language of Genre , 2010 .

[15]  David Ellis,et al.  The English literature researcher in the age of the Internet , 2005, J. Inf. Sci..

[16]  Serdar Tasiran,et al.  TreeJuxtaposer: scalable tree comparison using Focus+Context with guaranteed visibility , 2003, ACM Trans. Graph..

[17]  David S. Ebert,et al.  The shape of Shakespeare: visualizing text using implicit surfaces , 1998, Proceedings IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization (Cat. No.98TB100258).