Using AMOEBAs to display multispecies, multifleet fisheries advice

In multispecies fish communities, predation levels change dynamically in response to changes in the abundance of predator and prey species, as influenced by the fisheries that exploit them. In addition to community-level metrics, it remains necessary to track the abundance of each species relative to its biological reference point. In situations with many interacting species, exploited by multiple fishing fleets, it can be complicated to illustrate how the effort of each fleet will affect the abundance of each species. We have adapted the AMOEBA approach to graph the reference levels of multiple interacting species exploited by multiple fleets. This method is illustrated with 10 species and eight fishing fleets in the North Sea. We fit a relatively simple response-surface model to the predictions of a fully age-structured multispecies model. The response-surface model links the AMOEBA for fishing effort to separate AMOEBAs for spawning stock biomass, fishing mortality, and yield. Ordination is used to give the shape of the AMOEBAs functional meaning by relating fish species to the fleets that catch them. The aim is to present the results of dynamic multispecies models in a format that can be readily understood by decision makers. Interactive versions of the AMOEBAs can be used to identify desirable combinations of effort levels and to test the compatibility of the set of single-species biological reference points.

[1]  Morten Vinther,et al.  Specification and documentation of the 4M package containing multi-species, multi-fleet and multi-area models , 1995 .

[2]  Stephen J. Hall,et al.  The Effects Of Fishing On Mariane Ecosystems And Communities , 1998 .

[3]  Karl K. Turekian,et al.  Encyclopedia of Ocean Sciences , 2001 .

[4]  C. Bulman,et al.  Managing the Ecosystem by Leverage Points: A Model for a Multispecies Fishery , 1999 .

[5]  Robin Cook,et al.  Ecosystem approaches to fishery management , 2001 .

[6]  J. Collie,et al.  Biological reference points for fish stocks in a multispecies context , 2001 .

[7]  Jake C. Rice,et al.  Evaluating fishery impacts using metrics of community structure , 2000 .

[8]  F. Colijn,et al.  A quantitative method for description & assessment of ecosystems: The AMOEBA-approach , 1991 .

[9]  Nancy White,et al.  Using the AMOEBA approach to measure progress toward ecosystem sustainability within a shellfish restoration project in North Carolina , 2000 .

[10]  Chandler Stolp,et al.  The Visual Display of Quantitative Information , 1983 .

[11]  Colin W. Clark,et al.  Management of Multispecies Fisheries , 1979, Science.

[12]  Steven A. Murawski,et al.  Definitions of overfishing from an ecosystem perspective , 2000 .

[13]  Henrik Gislason,et al.  Single and multispecies reference points for Baltic fish stocks , 1999 .

[14]  P. A. Larkin.  Exploitation in a Type of Predator–Prey Relationship , 1966 .

[15]  J. Horbowy.  The dynamics of Baltic fish stocks on the basis of a multispecies stock-production model , 1996 .

[16]  Colin W. Clark,et al.  Bioeconomic Modelling and Fisheries Management. , 1985 .

[17]  R. G. Halliday,et al.  North Atlantic Fishery Management Systems: A Comparison of Management Methods and Resource Trends , 1996 .

[18]  Jeremy S. Collie,et al.  Are multispecies models an improvement on single-species models for measuring fishing impacts on marine ecosystems? , 2000 .

[19]  N. Daan,et al.  Multispecies models relevant to management of living resources , 1990 .

[20]  S. Tjelmeland,et al.  Fisheries in boreal ecosystems , 2000 .

[21]  P. Fayers,et al.  The Visual Display of Quantitative Information , 1990 .

[22]  M. Holden.  The Common Fisheries Policy. Origin, Evaluation and Future , 1994 .

[23]  Adam Gwiazda,et al.  The common fisheries policy: Economic aspects , 1993 .

[24]  Multispecies Interactions in the Georges Bank Fish Community , 1999 .

[25]  Fisheries: Multispecies Dynamics , 2001 .