Adaptive technology for e-learning: principles and case studies of an emerging field

This article discusses the rapidly emerging field of computer-based assessment for adaptive content in e-learning (National Research Council, 2002), which we call differentiated e-learning. In e-learning products, a variety of assessment approaches are being used for such diverse purposes as adaptive delivery of content, individualizing learning materials, dynamic feedback, cognitive diagnosis, score reporting, and course placement (Gifford, 2001). A recent paper at the General Teaching Council Conference in London, England, on teaching, learning, and accountability described assessment for personalized learning through e-learning products as a “quiet revolution” taking place in education (Hopkins, 2004). In our study, we examine approaches for the use of assessment evidence in e-learning in four case studies. The products in the case studies were selected for exhibiting at least one exemplary aspect regarding assessment and measurement. The principles of the Berkeley Evaluation & Assessment Research Center Assessment System (Wilson & Sloane, 2000) are used as a framework of analysis for these products with respect to key measurement principles.

[1]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[2]  Owen Conlan,et al.  The Challenge of Content Creation to Facilitate Personalized E-Learning Experiences , 2006 .

[3]  Michael J Timms Measurement issues in student modeling for intelligent tutoring systems. , 2000 .

[4]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Rules of the Mind , 1993 .

[5]  Robert J. Mislevy,et al.  Design Rationale for a Complex Performance Assessment , 2004 .

[6]  Mark Wilson,et al.  From Principles to Practice: An Embedded Assessment System , 2000 .

[7]  James W. Pellegrino,et al.  Knowing What Students Know. , 2003 .

[8]  Mark Wilson,et al.  Constructing Measures: An Item Response Modeling Approach , 2004 .

[9]  David M. Williamson,et al.  Introduction to Evidence Centered Design and Lessons Learned From Its Application in a Global E-Learning Program , 2004 .

[10]  Steven J. Osterlind,et al.  Constructing Test Items: Multiple-Choice, Constructed-Response, Performance and Other Formats , 2006 .

[11]  Raymond J. Adams,et al.  The Multidimensional Random Coefficients Multinomial Logit Model , 1997 .

[12]  Cynthia G. Parshall,et al.  Innovative Item Types for Computerized Testing , 2000 .

[13]  Carol Ann Tomlinson,et al.  Integrating Differentiated Instruction and Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids , 2006 .

[14]  L. Resnick,et al.  Assessing the Thinking Curriculum: New Tools for Educational Reform , 1992 .

[15]  C. Lebiere,et al.  The Atomic Components of Thought , 1998 .