Scan-rescan repeatability and cross-scanner comparability of DTI metrics in healthy subjects in the SPRINT-MS multicenter trial.

PURPOSE To assess intrascanner repeatability and cross-scanner comparability for diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) metrics in a multicenter clinical trial. METHODS DTI metrics (including longitudinal diffusivity [LD], fractional anisotropy [FA], mean diffusivity [MD], and transverse diffusivity [TD]) from pyramidal tracts for healthy controls were calculated from images acquired on twenty-seven 3T MR scanners (Siemens and GE) with 6 different scanner models and 7 different software versions as part of the NN102/SPRINT-MS clinical trial. Each volunteer underwent two scanning sessions on the same scanner. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and signal-to-noise floor ratio (SNFR) were also assessed. RESULTS DTI metrics showed good scan-rescan repeatability. There were no significant differences between scans and rescans in LD, FA, MD, or TD values. Although the cross-scanner coefficient of variation (CV) values for all DTI metrics were <5.7%, significant differences were observed for LD (p < 3.3e-5) and FA (p < 0.0024) when GE scanners were compared with Siemens scanners. Significant differences were also observed for SNR when comparing GE scanners and Siemens Skyra scanners (p < 1.4e-7) and when comparing Siemens Skyra scanners and TIM Trio scanners (p < 1.0e-10). Analysis of background signal also demonstrated differences between GE and Siemens scanners in terms of signal statistics. The measured signal intensity from a background noise region of interest was significantly higher for GE scanners than for Siemens scanners (p < 1.2e-12). Significant differences were also observed for SNFR when comparing GE scanners and Siemens Skyra scanners (p < 2.5e-11), GE scanners and Siemens Trio scanners (p < 7.5e-11), and Siemens Skyra scanners and TIM Trio scanners (p < 2.5e-9). CONCLUSIONS The good repeatability of the DTI metrics among the 27 scanners used in this study confirms the feasibility of combining DTI data from multiple centers using high angular resolution sequences. Our observations support the feasibility of longitudinal multicenter clinical trials using DTI outcome measures. The noise floor level and SNFR are important parameters that must be assessed when comparing studies that used different scanner models.

[1]  J. Long,et al.  Design, rationale, and baseline characteristics of the randomized double-blind phase II clinical trial of ibudilast in progressive multiple sclerosis. , 2016, Contemporary clinical trials.

[2]  R. Roos,et al.  Evaluating multicenter DTI data in Huntington's disease on site specific effects: An ex post facto approach☆ , 2013, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[3]  Carlo Pierpaoli,et al.  Regional distribution of measurement error in diffusion tensor imaging , 2006, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[4]  Brittany M. Young,et al.  DTI measures track and predict motor function outcomes in stroke rehabilitation utilizing BCI technology , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[5]  M. Lowe,et al.  Resting state sensorimotor functional connectivity in multiple sclerosis inversely correlates with transcallosal motor pathway transverse diffusivity , 2008, Human brain mapping.

[6]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  Chris Frost,et al.  Test-Retest Reliability of Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Huntington’s Disease , 2014, PLoS currents.

[8]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Reliability, repeatability and reproducibility: analysis of measurement errors in continuous variables , 2008, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[9]  Xue Wang,et al.  Reproducibility of Structural, Resting-State BOLD and DTI Data between Identical Scanners , 2012, PloS one.

[10]  Vijay K. Venkatraman,et al.  Region of interest correction factors improve reliability of diffusion imaging measures within and across scanners and field strengths , 2015, NeuroImage.

[11]  P. Rossini,et al.  Free water elimination improves test–retest reproducibility of diffusion tensor imaging indices in the brain: A longitudinal multisite study of healthy elderly subjects , 2017, Human brain mapping.

[12]  H. Benali,et al.  BrainVISA: Software platform for visualization and analysis of multi-modality brain data , 2001, NeuroImage.

[13]  Stefan Klöppel,et al.  Anatomical MRI and DTI in the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: a European multicenter study. , 2012, Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD.

[14]  Marc Modat,et al.  An unbiased longitudinal analysis framework for tracking white matter changes using diffusion tensor imaging with application to Alzheimer's disease , 2013, NeuroImage.

[15]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL , 2004, NeuroImage.

[16]  P. Basser,et al.  Toward a quantitative assessment of diffusion anisotropy , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  P. Choyke,et al.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations. , 2009, Neoplasia.

[18]  J. Alger,et al.  Between-Scanner and Between-Visit Variation in Normal White Matter Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values in the Setting of a Multi-Center Clinical Trial , 2016, Clinical Neuroradiology.

[19]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[20]  Kevin A. Johnson,et al.  Multisite, multimodal neuroimaging of chronic urological pelvic pain: Methodology of the MAPP Research Network , 2016, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[21]  Magda Tsolaki,et al.  Multisite longitudinal reliability of tract-based spatial statistics in diffusion tensor imaging of healthy elderly subjects , 2014, NeuroImage.

[22]  Mark Lowe,et al.  Retrospective correction of bias in diffusion tensor imaging arising from coil combination mode. , 2017, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[23]  Derek K. Jones,et al.  “Squashing peanuts and smashing pumpkins”: How noise distorts diffusion‐weighted MR data , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  Xing Qiu,et al.  Quantification of accuracy and precision of multi-center DTI measurements: A diffusion phantom and human brain study , 2011, NeuroImage.

[25]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Automated white‐matter tractography using a probabilistic diffusion tensor atlas: Application to temporal lobe epilepsy , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[26]  John S. Duncan,et al.  Identical, but not the same: Intra-site and inter-site reproducibility of fractional anisotropy measures on two 3.0 T scanners , 2010, NeuroImage.

[27]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Characterization of Functional and Structural Integrity in Experimental Focal Epilepsy: Reduced Network Efficiency Coincides with White Matter Changes , 2012, PloS one.

[28]  J. Debbins,et al.  A Validation Study of Multicenter Diffusion Tensor Imaging: Reliability of Fractional Anisotropy and Diffusivity Values , 2012, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[29]  Mara Cercignani,et al.  Twenty‐five pitfalls in the analysis of diffusion MRI data , 2010, NMR in biomedicine.

[30]  Kilian M. Pohl,et al.  Harmonizing DTI measurements across scanners to examine the development of white matter microstructure in 803 adolescents of the NCANDA study , 2016, NeuroImage.

[31]  D. Auer,et al.  Multi-centre reproducibility of diffusion MRI parameters for clinical sequences in the brain , 2015, NMR in biomedicine.

[32]  Ken E Sakaie,et al.  Quantitative quality assurance in a multicenter HARDI clinical trial at 3T. , 2017, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[33]  T P L Roberts,et al.  High Angular Resolution Diffusion Imaging Probabilistic Tractography of the Auditory Radiation , 2013, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[34]  C. Frost,et al.  Evaluation of multi-modal, multi-site neuroimaging measures in Huntington's disease: Baseline results from the PADDINGTON study☆ , 2012, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[35]  Stefan Klöppel,et al.  Multicenter stability of diffusion tensor imaging measures: A European clinical and physical phantom study , 2011, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[36]  D. Schnyer,et al.  Toward Precision and Reproducibility of Diffusion Tensor Imaging: A Multicenter Diffusion Phantom and Traveling Volunteer Study , 2016, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[37]  H. Gudbjartsson,et al.  The rician distribution of noisy mri data , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.