The Game as a Classroom: Understanding Players’ Goals and Attributions from a Learning Perspective

Much work has been done on educational games, game-based learning, and gamification in recent years, exploring how games may benefit learning. However, the reverse relationship has yet to be fully explored—how can educational psychology and pedagogy influence our understanding of player experience and the design of games? A study was conducted to examine how various aspects of player experience are related to two commonly used motivational constructs in educational psychology: achievement goals and causal attributions. In the study, 165 participants were asked to play a game and fill out a questionnaire on their experiences. We found that players’ achievement goals and causal attributions were both significantly correlated to various components of player experience. Additionally, we found that achievement goals and causal attributions are significant predictors of psychological flow over and above feelings of challenge and immersion. While challenge and immersion are typical considerations when seeking to design flow experiences in games, this study suggests that game designers should also consider ways in which they may inspire particular achievement goals and causal attributions in their players. These findings highlight the connection between the learning sciences and the growing field of player experience, and we hope this paper serves as an example for future translational work.

[1]  Liuyi Shu,et al.  Student Engagement in Game-Based Learning: A Literature Review From 2008 to 2018 , 2018, Proceedings of the 2019 AERA Annual Meeting.

[2]  Robert K. Atkinson,et al.  Modeling Gameplay Enjoyment, Goal Orientations, and Individual Characteristics , 2014, Int. J. Game Based Learn..

[3]  Peta Wyeth,et al.  GameFlow: a model for evaluating player enjoyment in games , 2005, CIE.

[4]  Sandra Graham,et al.  A review of attribution theory in achievement contexts , 1991 .

[5]  L. Beck,et al.  Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience , 1992 .

[6]  Sam Alexander,et al.  The Gameful World: approaches, issues, applications , 2016, Ergonomics.

[7]  Andrew K. Przybylski,et al.  The Motivational Pull of Video Games: A Self-Determination Theory Approach , 2006 .

[8]  Raymond P. Perry,et al.  Enhancing achievement motivation and performance in college students: An attributional retraining perspective , 1993 .

[9]  Juho Hamari,et al.  Does Gamification Work? -- A Literature Review of Empirical Studies on Gamification , 2014, 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[10]  Martin Schmettow Tutorial: Modern Regression Techniques for HCI Researchers , 2015, INTERACT.

[11]  Constance Steinkuehler,et al.  Building persistence through failure: the role of challenge in video games , 2019, FDG.

[12]  Carey E. Andrzejewski,et al.  How Do Teachers Support Students’ Motivation and Learning in Their Classrooms? , 2011, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[13]  M. Csíkszentmihályi Flow and Education , 2014 .

[14]  D. Hoang FLOW: The Psychology of Optimal Experience , 2018 .

[15]  Thomas W. Malone,et al.  Toward a Theory of Intrinsically Motivating Instruction , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[16]  Ansgar E. Depping,et al.  Why is This Happening to Me?: How Player Attribution can Broaden our Understanding of Player Experience , 2017, CHI.

[17]  Lloyd P. Rieber,et al.  Seriously considering play: Designing interactive learning environments based on the blending of microworlds, simulations, and games , 1996 .

[18]  Richard N. Aslin,et al.  The Goldilocks Effect: Human Infants Allocate Attention to Visual Sequences That Are Neither Too Simple Nor Too Complex , 2012, PloS one.

[19]  Steven Poole,et al.  Trigger Happy: Videogames and the Entertainment Revolution , 2004 .

[20]  D. Kort,et al.  D3.3 : Game Experience Questionnaire:development of a self-report measure to assess the psychological impact of digital games , 2007 .

[21]  Robin Hunicke,et al.  The case for dynamic difficulty adjustment in games , 2005, ACE '05.

[22]  A. Elliot,et al.  A 2 X 2 achievement goal framework. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  Roger Azevedo,et al.  Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate students ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia? q , 2004 .

[24]  Yu-Hao Lee,et al.  Beyond player types: gaming achievement goal , 2011, SIGGRAPH '11.

[25]  S. A. Coutinho The relationship between goals, metacognition, and academic success , 2007 .

[26]  Liyan Song,et al.  Digital Game-Based Learning , 2014 .

[27]  B. Weiner,et al.  A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences. , 1979, Journal of educational psychology.

[28]  Scott Nicholson,et al.  A RECIPE for Meaningful Gamification , 2015 .

[29]  Kenton O'Hara,et al.  Gamification. using game-design elements in non-gaming contexts , 2011, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[30]  Myoungsook Kim,et al.  Academic boredom in under- and over-challenging situations , 2010 .