Implant prosthodontic management of partially edentulous patients missing posterior teeth: the Toronto experience.

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM The clinical success of implant-supported fixed partial dentures has been documented. However, few studies have reported long-term results or any association between implant outcomes and host determinants. PURPOSE This study reports on implant and prosthesis outcomes in a group of partially edentulous patients treated with Brånemark implants in the posterior zones. It also examines factors described in the medical history that may influence implant survival. MATERIAL AND METHODS The charts of patients treated with implants from 1983 and followed prospectively through December 2001 at the University of Toronto were reviewed. One hundred thirty partially edentulous patients treated with implant-supported restorations in the posterior zones (area distal to mental foramen) were selected. Implant and prosthesis treatment outcomes were recorded and analyzed through the Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods (P<.05). RESULTS A total of 130 patients received 432 Brånemark dental implants in 174 posterior edentulous spans. The mean age of the patients at the time of insertion of the implants was 50.97 +/- 13.27 years. At 15 years, the overall implant and prosthesis survival rates were 91.6% and 89%, respectively. At 5 years, the survival rate of the wide-platform 5-mm-diameter implants was 76.3%. Implant diameter (P=.0001) and a history of a chronic medical condition (P=.01) were correlated with implant survival outcomes. CONCLUSIONS High success of implant-supported prostheses in the posterior zones of both the maxilla and mandible. It corroborated other studies that have shown higher failure rates for wide-platform implants, emphasizing the need for proper establishment of clinical trials prior to marketing of new implant designs.

[1]  T. Jemt A prospective 15-year follow-up study of mandibular fixed prostheses supported by osseointegrated implants , 1997 .

[2]  D Buser,et al.  Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. , 1997, Clinical oral implants research.

[3]  R. Jaffin,et al.  The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone: a 5-year analysis. , 1991, Journal of periodontology.

[4]  D van Steenberghe,et al.  Survival of the Brånemark implant in partially edentulous jaws: a 10-year prospective multicenter study. , 1999, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[5]  O Bahat,et al.  Brånemark system implants in the posterior maxilla: clinical study of 660 implants followed for 5 to 12 years. , 2000, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[6]  T Jemt,et al.  A prospective 15-year follow-up study of mandibular fixed prostheses supported by osseointegrated implants. Clinical results and marginal bone loss. , 1996, Clinical oral implants research.

[7]  S E Eckert,et al.  Early experience with Wide-Platform Mk II implants. Part I: Implant survival. Part II: Evaluation of risk factors involving implant survival. , 2001, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[8]  G. Zarb,et al.  Bone level changes proximal to oral implants supporting fixed partial prostheses. , 2002, Clinical oral implants research.

[9]  I Herrmann,et al.  Osseointegrated implants for treatment of partially edentulous jaws: A 5 year prospective multicentre study , 1994 .

[10]  George A. Zarb,et al.  Tissue-Integrated Prostheses: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry , 1985 .

[11]  G. Zarb,et al.  Treatment outcomes of patients with implant-supported fixed partial prostheses. , 1998, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[12]  L Sennerby,et al.  Influence of variations in implant diameters: a 3- to 5-year retrospective clinical report. , 1999, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[13]  T Albrektsson,et al.  Consensus report: towards optimized treatment outcomes for dental implants. , 1998, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[14]  G. Zarb,et al.  The edentulous predicament. II: The longitudinal effectiveness of implant-supported overdentures. , 1996, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[15]  G. Zarb,et al.  The edentulous predicament. I: A prospective study of the effectiveness of implant-supported fixed prostheses. , 1996, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[16]  P. Branemark,et al.  Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. , 1990, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[17]  U. Lekholm,et al.  Patient selection and preparation , 1985 .

[18]  F. Blondeau,et al.  A multi-centre study of Osseotite implants supporting mandibular restorations: a 3-year report. , 2001, Journal.

[19]  T. Testori,et al.  A prospective multicenter clinical study of the Osseotite implant: four-year interim report. , 2001, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[20]  G. Zarb,et al.  Implant prosthodontics in medically challenged patients: the University of Toronto experience. , 2002, Journal.

[21]  G. Zarb,et al.  The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants in anterior partially edentulous patients. , 1993, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[22]  P. Henry,et al.  Rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible with osseointegrated dental implants: 10 year follow-up. , 1995, Australian dental journal.

[23]  M. Pharoah,et al.  Managing the posterior mandible of partially edentulous patients with short, porous-surfaced dental implants: early data from a clinical trial. , 2001, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[24]  P I Brånemark,et al.  A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. , 1981, International journal of oral surgery.