Spin‐flip approach within time‐dependent density functional tight‐binding method: Theory and applications

A spin‐flip time‐dependent density functional tight‐binding (SF‐TDDFTB) method is developed that describes target states as spin‐flipping excitation from a high‐spin reference state obtained by the spin‐restricted open shell treatment. Furthermore, the SF‐TDDFTB formulation is extended to long‐range correction (LC), denoted as SF‐TDLCDFTB. The LC technique corrects the overdelocalization of electron density in systems such as charge‐transfer systems, which is typically found in conventional DFTB calculations as well as density functional theory calculations using pure functionals. The numerical assessment of the SF‐TDDFTB method shows smooth potential curves for the bond dissociation of hydrogen fluoride and the double‐bond rotation of ethylene and the double‐cone shape of H3 as the simplest degenerate systems. In addition, numerical assessments of SF‐TDDFTB and SF‐TDLCDFTB for 39 S0/S1 minimum energy conical intersection (MECI) structures are performed. The SF‐TDDFTB and SF‐TDLCDFTB methods drastically reduce the computational cost with accuracy for MECI structures compared with SF‐TDDFT.

[1]  K. Morokuma,et al.  Systematic exploration of minimum energy conical intersection structures near the Franck-Condon region. , 2014, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[2]  Mark S Gordon,et al.  Optimizing conical intersections of solvated molecules: the combined spin-flip density functional theory/effective fragment potential method. , 2012, The Journal of chemical physics.

[3]  Chien‐Pin Chou,et al.  Theoretical Analysis of Carrier Ion Diffusion in Superconcentrated Electrolyte Solutions for Sodium-Ion Batteries. , 2018, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[4]  Michael A. Robb,et al.  Application of unitary group methods to configuration interaction calculations , 1979 .

[5]  Masato Kobayashi Gradient of molecular Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov energy with a linear combination of atomic orbital quasiparticle wave functions. , 2014, The Journal of chemical physics.

[6]  Satoshi Maeda,et al.  Automated global mapping of minimal energy points on seams of crossing by the anharmonic downward distortion following method: a case study of H2CO. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[7]  H. Nakai,et al.  Unveiling controlling factors of the S0/S1 minimum energy conical intersection (2): Application to penalty function method. , 2020, The Journal of chemical physics.

[8]  H. Nakai,et al.  Rigorous pKa Estimation of Amine Species Using Density-Functional Tight-Binding-Based Metadynamics Simulations. , 2018, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[9]  Jeng-Da Chai Role of exact exchange in thermally-assisted-occupation density functional theory: A proposal of new hybrid schemes. , 2016, The Journal of chemical physics.

[10]  Dmitri G. Fedorov,et al.  Three‐body expansion of the fragment molecular orbital method combined with density‐functional tight‐binding , 2017, J. Comput. Chem..

[11]  Björn O. Roos,et al.  Second-order perturbation theory with a complete active space self-consistent field reference function , 1992 .

[12]  H. Nakai,et al.  Finite-temperature-based linear-scaling divide-and-conquer self-consistent field method for static electron correlation systems , 2019, Chemical Physics Letters.

[13]  H. Nakai,et al.  Contrasting mechanisms for CO2 absorption and regeneration processes in aqueous amine solutions: Insights from density-functional tight-binding molecular dynamics simulations , 2016 .

[14]  Weitao Yang,et al.  Challenges for density functional theory. , 2012, Chemical reviews.

[15]  Kerstin Andersson,et al.  Second-order perturbation theory with a CASSCF reference function , 1990 .

[16]  D. Mukherjee,et al.  Application of cluster expansion techniques to open shells: Calculation of difference energies , 1984 .

[17]  Anders S. Christensen,et al.  Semiempirical Quantum Mechanical Methods for Noncovalent Interactions for Chemical and Biochemical Applications , 2016, Chemical reviews.

[18]  Gotthard Seifert,et al.  Density‐functional tight binding—an approximate density‐functional theory method , 2012 .

[19]  H. Nakatsuji,et al.  FROZEN-ORBITAL ANALYSIS OF THE EXCITED STATES OF METAL COMPLEXES IN HIGH SYMMETRY : OH CASE , 1996 .

[20]  H. Monkhorst,et al.  Coupled-cluster method for multideterminantal reference states , 1981 .

[21]  Anna I. Krylov,et al.  Singlet-triplet gaps in diradicals by the spin-flip approach: A benchmark study , 2002 .

[22]  Jeng-Da Chai Density functional theory with fractional orbital occupations. , 2012, The Journal of chemical physics.

[23]  Uttam Sinha Mahapatra,et al.  A state-specific multi-reference coupled cluster formalism with molecular applications , 1998 .

[24]  Yoshifumi Nishimura,et al.  GPU‐Accelerated Large‐Scale Excited‐State Simulation Based on Divide‐and‐Conquer Time‐Dependent Density‐Functional Tight‐Binding , 2019, J. Comput. Chem..

[25]  Andreas Hansen,et al.  The Fractional Occupation Number Weighted Density as a Versatile Analysis Tool for Molecules with a Complicated Electronic Structure. , 2017, Chemistry.

[26]  Anna I. Krylov,et al.  Size-consistent wave functions for bond-breaking: the equation-of-motion spin-flip model , 2001 .

[27]  Hiromi Nakai,et al.  Divide-and-Conquer-Type Density-Functional Tight-Binding Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Proton Diffusion in a Bulk Water System. , 2016, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[28]  G. Mazur,et al.  Time-dependent density functional theory gradients in the Amsterdam density functional package: geometry optimizations of spin-flip excitations , 2011 .

[29]  Hélio A. Duarte,et al.  Density-functional based tight-binding: an approximate DFT method , 2009 .

[30]  Sándor Suhai,et al.  Self-consistent-charge density-functional tight-binding method for simulations of complex materials properties , 1998 .

[31]  S. Min,et al.  Formulation and Implementation of the Spin-Restricted Ensemble-Referenced Kohn-Sham Method in the Context of the Density Functional Tight Binding Approach. , 2019, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[32]  N. Mermin Thermal Properties of the Inhomogeneous Electron Gas , 1965 .

[33]  Chien‐Pin Chou,et al.  Quantum mechanical molecular dynamics simulations of polaron formation in methylammonium lead iodide perovskite. , 2019, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[34]  B. Aradi,et al.  Implementation and benchmark of a long-range corrected functional in the density functional based tight-binding method. , 2015, The Journal of chemical physics.

[35]  Debashree Ghosh,et al.  An Introduction to the Density Matrix Renormalization Group Ansatz in Quantum Chemistry , 2007, 0711.1398.

[36]  J. Dobaczewski,et al.  Local density approximation for proton-neutron pairing correlations: Formalism , 2004 .

[37]  H. Nakai,et al.  Fractional-occupation-number based divide-and-conquer coupled-cluster theory , 2018, Chemical Physics Letters.

[38]  Thierry Deutsch,et al.  Assessment of noncollinear spin-flip Tamm-Dancoff approximation time-dependent density-functional theory for the photochemical ring-opening of oxirane. , 2010, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[39]  Stephan Irle,et al.  Large-Scale Quantum-Mechanical Molecular Dynamics Simulations Using Density-Functional Tight-Binding Combined with the Fragment Molecular Orbital Method. , 2015, The journal of physical chemistry letters.

[40]  Hiromi Nakai,et al.  Parallel implementation of efficient charge–charge interaction evaluation scheme in periodic divide‐and‐conquer density‐functional tight‐binding calculations , 2018, J. Comput. Chem..

[41]  Rodney J. Bartlett,et al.  A multi-reference coupled-cluster method for molecular applications , 1984 .

[42]  Stephan Irle,et al.  Density-Functional Tight-Binding Combined with the Fragment Molecular Orbital Method. , 2014, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[43]  M. Elstner,et al.  Time-Dependent Extension of the Long-Range Corrected Density Functional Based Tight-Binding Method. , 2017, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[44]  Mark S Gordon,et al.  Optimizing conical intersections by spin-flip density functional theory: application to ethylene. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[45]  H. Nakai,et al.  Development of Large-Scale Excited-State Calculations Based on the Divide-and-Conquer Time-Dependent Density Functional Tight-Binding Method. , 2019, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[46]  B. Sumpter,et al.  The Fragment Molecular Orbital Method Based on Long-Range Corrected Density-Functional Tight-Binding. , 2019, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[47]  Masato Kobayashi,et al.  Three pillars for achieving quantum mechanical molecular dynamics simulations of huge systems: Divide‐and‐conquer, density‐functional tight‐binding, and massively parallel computation , 2016, J. Comput. Chem..

[48]  H. Nakai,et al.  Divide-and-Conquer Density-Functional Tight-Binding Molecular Dynamics Study on the Formation of Carbamate Ions during CO2 Chemical Absorption in Aqueous Amine Solution , 2017 .

[49]  H. Nakai,et al.  Unveiling Controlling Factors of the S0/S1 Minimum Energy Conical Intersection: A Theoretical Study. , 2018, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[50]  Yuki Yamada,et al.  Sodium- and potassium-hydrate melts containing asymmetric imide anions for high-voltage aqueous batteries. , 2019, Angewandte Chemie.

[51]  L. Slipchenko,et al.  5-Dehydro-1,3-quinodimethane: a hydrocarbon with an open-shell doublet ground state. , 2004, Angewandte Chemie.

[52]  P. Piecuch,et al.  Advances in the Theory of Atomic and Molecular Systems , 2009 .

[53]  P. Lugli,et al.  A simple tight-binding approach to Time-Dependent Density-Functional Response-Theory , 2001 .

[54]  Y. Nishimoto Time-Dependent Long-Range Corrected Density-Functional Tight-Binding Method Combined with the Polarizable Continuum Model. , 2019, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[55]  Roland Mitric,et al.  DFTBaby: A software package for non-adiabatic molecular dynamics simulations based on long-range corrected tight-binding TD-DFT(B) , 2017, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[56]  Thomas Frauenheim,et al.  Analytical excited state forces for the time‐dependent density‐functional tight‐binding method , 2007, J. Comput. Chem..

[57]  Hiromi Nakai,et al.  Dcdftbmd: Divide‐and‐Conquer Density Functional Tight‐Binding Program for Huge‐System Quantum Mechanical Molecular Dynamics Simulations , 2019, J. Comput. Chem..

[58]  B Aradi,et al.  Self-interaction and strong correlation in DFTB. , 2007, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[59]  Bálint Aradi,et al.  Parametrization of the SCC-DFTB Method for Halogens. , 2013, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[60]  Celestino Angeli,et al.  Introduction of n-electron valence states for multireference perturbation theory , 2001 .

[61]  Paul-Henri Heenen,et al.  Self-consistent mean-field models for nuclear structure , 2003 .

[62]  A. Niklasson A note on the Pulay force at finite electronic temperatures. , 2008, The Journal of chemical physics.

[63]  Ajit Banerjee,et al.  Applications of multiconfigurational coupled‐cluster theory , 1982 .

[64]  Yuki Yamada,et al.  Reversible Sodium Metal Electrodes: Is Fluorine an Essential Interphasial Component? , 2019, Angewandte Chemie.

[65]  H. Nakai,et al.  Divide-and-Conquer-Type Density-Functional Tight-Binding Simulations of Hydroxide Ion Diffusion in Bulk Water. , 2017, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[66]  S. Irle,et al.  Parametrization and Benchmark of Long-Range Corrected DFTB2 for Organic Molecules. , 2018, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[67]  Y. Nishimoto Time-dependent density-functional tight-binding method with the third-order expansion of electron density. , 2015, The Journal of chemical physics.

[68]  Jeng-Da Chai,et al.  Thermally-assisted-occupation density functional theory with generalized-gradient approximations. , 2014, The Journal of chemical physics.

[69]  Stephan Irle,et al.  Third-order density-functional tight-binding combined with the fragment molecular orbital method , 2015 .

[70]  D. Fedorov,et al.  Adaptive frozen orbital treatment for the fragment molecular orbital method combined with density-functional tight-binding. , 2018, The Journal of chemical physics.

[71]  H. Nakai,et al.  Extension of Frozen-orbital Analysis to the Tamm-Dancoff Approximation to Time-dependent Density Functional Theory , 2009 .

[72]  Michael A. Robb,et al.  Direct minimization in mc scf theory. the quasi-newton method , 1981 .

[73]  Hisashi Okumura,et al.  Rapid QM/MM approach for biomolecular systems under periodic boundary conditions: Combination of the density‐functional tight‐binding theory and particle mesh Ewald method , 2016, J. Comput. Chem..

[74]  Gotthard Seifert,et al.  Density functional tight binding , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[75]  Keiji Morokuma,et al.  Case Studies of ONIOM(DFT:DFTB) and ONIOM(DFT:DFTB:MM) for Enzymes and Enzyme Mimics , 2010 .

[76]  Michael Gaus,et al.  Density functional tight binding: application to organic and biological molecules , 2014 .

[77]  Hao Hu,et al.  Simulating water with the self-consistent-charge density functional tight binding method: from molecular clusters to the liquid state. , 2007, The journal of physical chemistry. A.