Life Cycle Energy Cost Assessment for Pump Units with Various Types of Line-Start Operating Motors Including Cable Losses

The paper presents a comparative analysis of life-cycle energy consumption for three different types of 4 kW line-start motors used in a pump unit with throttling: the most widely used induction motor with IE3 efficiency class, line start permanent magnet synchronous motor with IE4 efficiency class and line start synchronous reluctance motor with IE4 efficiency class. The operating cycle for pump units with constant flow is considered for the above-mentioned types of motors taking into account not only the losses in the pump and motor, but also in the power supply cable. It is shown that the line start synchronous reluctance motor without magnets has the highest efficiency over the entire considered loading range. However, its power factor is lower than that of the synchronous motor with magnets and therefore it has more significant losses in power supply cable. Despite this disadvantage, the line-start reluctance motor is a good alternative to widespread induction motor since it allows saving of approximately 4000 euro more than the latter during the 20 years life cycle. It also provides similar savings in comparison to the permanent magnet synchronous motor, but unlike it, it does not have costly rare-earth materials in the rotor.

[1]  H. Kärkkäinen,et al.  Direct-On-Line Synchronous Reluctance Motor Efficiency Verification with Calorimetric Measurements , 2018, 2018 XIII International Conference on Electrical Machines (ICEM).

[2]  S. Umashankar,et al.  A comprehensive review on energy efficiency enhancement initiatives in centrifugal pumping system , 2016 .

[4]  Fernando J. T. E. Ferreira,et al.  Beyond Induction Motors—Technology Trends to Move Up Efficiency , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[5]  Deliang Liang,et al.  Design of IE4 Level Synchronous Reluctance Machines with Different Number of Poles , 2019, 2019 22nd International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems (ICEMS).

[6]  M.A. Rahman,et al.  High-efficiency line-start interior permanent-magnet synchronous motors , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[7]  Viacheslav E. Vavilov,et al.  Line-Start Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor for Aerospace Application , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Electrical Systems for Aircraft, Railway, Ship Propulsion and Road Vehicles & International Transportation Electrification Conference (ESARS-ITEC).

[8]  G. Pellegrino,et al.  Line-start synchronous reluctance motors: Design guidelines and testing via active inertia emulation , 2015, 2015 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE).

[9]  Peter C. Dent,et al.  Rare earth elements and permanent magnets (invited) , 2012 .

[10]  A. D. Sahasrabudhe,et al.  A Comparative Study of Life Cycle Cost Analysis of Pumps , 2010 .

[11]  Vadim Kazakbaev,et al.  Energy Efficiency Analysis of Fixed-Speed Pump Drives with Various Types of Motors , 2019, Applied Sciences.

[12]  Vadim Kazakbaev,et al.  Developing ultra premium efficiency (IE5 class) magnet-free synchronous reluctance motor , 2016, 2016 6th International Electric Drives Production Conference (EDPC).

[13]  Vadim Kazakbaev,et al.  IE5 Energy-Efficiency Class Synchronous Reluctance Motor With Fractional Slot Winding , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[14]  Md Ashfanoor Kabir,et al.  Application of a Multilayer AC Winding to Design Synchronous Reluctance Motors , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[15]  E. S. Obe Steady-state performance of a line-start synchronous reluctance motor with capacitive assistance , 2010 .

[16]  Ju Lee,et al.  Optimum Design of an IE4 Line-Start Synchronous Reluctance Motor Considering Manufacturing Process Loss Effect , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[18]  Gianmario Pellegrino,et al.  Automatic Design of Synchronous Reluctance Motors Focusing on Barrier Shape Optimization , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[19]  Milad Niaz Azari,et al.  Line-start permanent-magnet motor synchronisation capability improvement using slotted solid rotor , 2013 .

[20]  Howard E. Kremers The Rare Earth Industry , 1949 .

[21]  Adisa A. Jimoh,et al.  Analysis of synchronous reluctance machine with magnetically coupled three-phase windings and reactive power compensation , 2010 .

[22]  Anton Kersten,et al.  Rotor Design of Line-Start Synchronous Reluctance Machine With Round Bars , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[23]  Rong-Jie Wang,et al.  Multiobjective Design of a Line-Start PM Motor Using the Taguchi Method , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[24]  P. Sethupathi,et al.  Comparative analysis of line-start permanent magnet synchronous motor and squirrel cage induction motor under customary power quality indices , 2020 .

[25]  Chen Cheng,et al.  Reducing voltage energy-saving control method of induction motor , 2013, 2013 International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems (ICEMS).

[26]  Mohammadreza Mostafavi Ghahfarokhi,et al.  Analytical modelling and optimisation of line start LSPM synchronous motors , 2020, IET Electric Power Applications.

[27]  Freddy Magnussen,et al.  Theoretical and Experimental Reevaluation of Synchronous Reluctance Machine , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[28]  J. H. C. Pretorius,et al.  Utilising high and premium efficiency three phase motors with VFDs in a public water supply system , 2015, 2015 IEEE 5th International Conference on Power Engineering, Energy and Electrical Drives (POWERENG).

[29]  Vadim Kazakbaev,et al.  Comparison of power consumption of synchronous reluctance and induction motor drives in a 0.75 kW pump unit , 2017, 2017 International Siberian Conference on Control and Communications (SIBCON).

[30]  G. Pellegrino,et al.  Design of a line-start synchronous reluctance motor , 2013, 2013 International Electric Machines & Drives Conference.

[31]  Thomas R. Brinner,et al.  Induction Versus Permanent-Magnet Motors for Electric Submersible Pump Field and Laboratory Comparisons , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[32]  Rakhyun Kim,et al.  A Study on the Limitations of South Korea’s National Roadmap for Greenhouse Gas Reduction by 2030 and Suggestions for Improvement , 2019, Sustainability.

[33]  Mircea Popescu,et al.  A comparison of an interior permanent magnet and copper rotor induction motor in a hybrid electric vehicle application , 2013, 2013 International Electric Machines & Drives Conference.

[34]  Jero Ahola,et al.  Effect of electric motor efficiency and sizing on the energy efficiency in pumping systems , 2016, 2016 18th European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications (EPE'16 ECCE Europe).

[35]  Mohamed Nabil Fathy Ibrahim,et al.  Efficiency Analysis of Low Electric Power Drives Employing Induction and Synchronous Reluctance Motors in Pump Applications , 2019 .

[36]  M. K. Kirar,et al.  Cable sizing and effects of cable length on dynamic performance of induction motor , 2012, 2012 IEEE Fifth Power India Conference.