A synergy-driven approach to a myoelectric hand

In this paper, we present the Pisa/IIT SoftHand with myoelectric control as a synergy-driven approach for a prosthetic hand. Commercially available myoelectric hands are more expensive, heavier, and less robust than their body-powered counterparts; however, they can offer greater freedom of motion and a more aesthetically pleasing appearance. The Pisa/IIT SoftHand is built on the motor control principle of synergies through which the immense complexity of the hand is simplified into distinct motor patterns. As the SoftHand grasps, it follows a synergistic path with built-in flexibility to allow grasping of a wide variety of objects with a single motor. Here we test, as a proof-of-concept, 4 myoelectric controllers: a standard controller in which the EMG signal is used only as a position reference, an impedance controller that determines both position and stiffness references from the EMG input, a standard controller with vibrotactile force feedback, and finally a combined vibrotactile-impedance (VI) controller. Four healthy subjects tested the control algorithms by grasping various objects. All controllers were sufficient for basic grasping, however the impedance and vibrotactile controllers reduced the physical and cognitive load on the user, while the combined VI mode was the easiest to use of the four. While these results need to be validated with amputees, they suggest a low-cost, robust hand employing hardware-based synergies is a viable alternative to traditional myoelectric prostheses.

[1]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  Tele-impedance: Teleoperation with impedance regulation using a body–machine interface , 2012, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[2]  R. Buschbacher Anatomical Guide for the Electromyographer: The Limbs and Trunk , 2007 .

[3]  Toshio Tsuji,et al.  Bio-mimetic impedance control of an EMG-controlled prosthetic hand , 2000, Proceedings. 2000 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2000) (Cat. No.00CH37113).

[4]  A. Kargov,et al.  Design and Evaluation of a Low-Cost Force Feedback System for Myoelectric Prosthetic Hands , 2006 .

[5]  E. Delagi,et al.  Anatomical guide for the electromyographer : the limbs and trunk /by Edward F. Delagi [et al.] ; illustrated by Phyllis B. Hammond, Aldo O. Perotto, and Hugh Thomas , 2005 .

[6]  Ning Jiang,et al.  Extracting Simultaneous and Proportional Neural Control Information for Multiple-DOF Prostheses From the Surface Electromyographic Signal , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  Clément Gosselin,et al.  Underactuated Robotic Hands , 2008, Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics.

[8]  Volkan Patoglu,et al.  Tele-impedance control of a variable stiffness prosthetic hand , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO).

[9]  Manuel G. Catalano,et al.  Adaptive synergies for a humanoid robot hand , 2012, 2012 12th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids 2012).

[10]  Marco P. Schoen,et al.  Control strategies for smart prosthetic hand technology: An overview , 2008, 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[11]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Modelling natural and artificial hands with synergies , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Postural Hand Synergies for Tool Use , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.