The detection layout problem

The main traffic models, either for planning or operational purposes, use as major data input Origin-Destination (OD) trip matrices describing the patterns of traffic behavior across the network. OD matrices become in this way a critical requirement of Advanced Traffic Management or Information Systems supported by Dynamic Traffic Assignment models. However, as far as OD matrices are not directly observable, the current practice consist of adjusting an initial or seed matrix from link flow counts provided by an existing layout of traffic counting stations. The adequacy of the detection layout strongly determines the quality of the adjusted OD. Usual approaches to the Detection Layout problem assume that detectors are located at network links but some of the Information and Communication Technologies specially those based on the detection of the electronic signature of on board devices, as for example Bluetooth devices, allow the location of sensor at intersections. This paper proposes a reformulation of the link detection layout problem adapting the classical set covering approaches with side constraints and solving it efficiently by a tabu search metaheuristic. For the intersection layout covering problem a reformulation is proposed in terms of a node covering problem with side constraints that for practical purposes can be efficiently solved with standard professional solvers.

[1]  Giuseppe Confessore,et al.  A Network Based Model for Traffic Sensor Location with Implications on O/D Matrix Estimates , 2001, Transp. Sci..

[2]  Haris N. Koutsopoulos,et al.  Nonlinear Kalman Filtering Algorithms for On-Line Calibration of Dynamic Traffic Assignment Models , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[3]  Ennio Cascetta,et al.  Transportation Systems Engineering: Theory and Methods , 2001 .

[4]  Michael Bierlaire,et al.  The total demand scale: a new measure of quality for static and dynamic origin–destination trip tables , 2002 .

[5]  Haris N. Koutsopoulos,et al.  Network State Estimation and Prediction for Real-Time Traffic Management , 2001 .

[6]  Alain Hertz,et al.  A TUTORIAL ON TABU SEARCH , 1992 .

[7]  Martin W. P. Savelsbergh,et al.  Preprocessing and Probing Techniques for Mixed Integer Programming Problems , 1994, INFORMS J. Comput..

[8]  Henk J van Zuylen,et al.  The most likely trip matrix estimated from traffic counts , 1980 .

[9]  Enrique F. Castillo,et al.  The Observability Problem in Traffic Network Models , 2008, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[10]  Fred W. Glover,et al.  Future paths for integer programming and links to artificial intelligence , 1986, Comput. Oper. Res..

[11]  Moshe E. Ben-Akiva,et al.  Alternative Approaches for Real-Time Estimation and Prediction of Time-Dependent Origin-Destination Flows , 2000, Transp. Sci..

[12]  Hai Yang,et al.  Optimal traffic counting locations for origin–destination matrix estimation , 1998 .

[13]  Anders Peterson,et al.  A heuristic for the bilevel origin-destination-matrix estimation problem , 2008 .

[14]  Carlos Carmona,et al.  Travel Time Forecasting and Dynamic Origin-Destination Estimation for Freeways Based on Bluetooth Traffic Monitoring , 2010 .

[15]  Hani S. Mahmassani,et al.  Sensor Coverage and Location for Real-Time Traffic Prediction in Large-Scale Networks , 2007 .

[16]  Jaume Barceló,et al.  Adjustment of O-D trip matrices from observed volumes: An algorithmic approach based on conjugate directions , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  D. Hearn,et al.  Chapter 6 Network equilibrium models and algorithms , 1995 .