Gait training with the newly developed ‘LokoHelp’-system is feasible for non-ambulatory patients after stroke, spinal cord and brain injury. A feasibility study

Primary objective: To evaluate the feasibility of using a newly developed electromechanical gait device (LokoHelp) for locomotion training in neurological patients with impaired walking ability with respect to training effects and patients’ and therapists’ efforts and discomfort. Methods and procedures: Design: Case series. Setting: A neurological rehabilitation centre for children, adolescents and young adults. Subjects: Six patients with impaired walking function: two after stroke, two after spinal cord injury and two after brain injury. Intervention: Twenty additional training sessions on a treadmill fitted with a newly developed electromechanical gait device and body weight support (BWS), performed over a study-period of 6 weeks. Main outcomes and results: Patients’ progress was assessed with the following instruments: the Functional Ambulation Category FAC (walking ability), the 10-metre walk test (gait velocity), the Motricity Index (lower limb strength), the Berg Balance Scale (postural capacity), the modified Ashworth Scale (spasticity) and the Rivermead Mobility Index (activity). After each therapy session, therapists completed a form, thereby indicating whether manual assistance was necessary and, if so, how much physical effort was expended and how much discomfort was experienced during the therapy session. The therapists also indicated on the form information about the patient's effort and discomfort. No severe adverse events were observed during the locomotion training with the LokoHelp device. Patients improved with regard to Functional Ambulation Category (FAC) (from mean 0.7, SD = 1.6, to mean 2.5, SD = 2.1, p = 0.048), Motricity Index (from mean 94 points, SD = 50, to mean 111, SD = 52, p = 0.086), Berg Balance Scale (BBS) (from mean 20 points, SD = 23 to mean 25, SD = 23, p = 0.168) and Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI) (from mean 5 points, SD = 4, to mean 7, SD = 5, p = 0.033). Therapists required a low level of effort to carry out the training and seldom experienced discomfort. Patients described their effort during training as being low-to-exhausting. They rarely experienced discomfort, which was mostly related to difficulties with the BWS-System. Training intensity had to be adjusted in one patient who complained of knee pain. Conclusions: Locomotion training with the newly developed ‘LokoHelp’-system is feasible in severely affected patients after brain injury, stroke and spinal cord injury. In addition, our results indicate that the described alternative method of gait training may decrease the exertion needed by therapists to carry out the training.

[1]  G. Demeurisse,et al.  Motor evaluation in vascular hemiplegia. , 1980, European neurology.

[2]  K. M. Gill,et al.  Clinical gait assessment in the neurologically impaired. Reliability and meaningfulness. , 1984, Physical therapy.

[3]  K. M. Gill,et al.  Clinical Gait Assessment in the Neurologically Impaired , 1984 .

[4]  K. M. Gill,et al.  Gait assessment for neurologically impaired patients. Standards for outcome assessment. , 1986, Physical therapy.

[5]  K. M. Gill,et al.  Gait Assessment for Neurologically Impaired Patients , 1986 .

[6]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. , 1987, Physical therapy.

[7]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Rehabilitation goals of patients with hemiplegia , 1988 .

[8]  D. Wade,et al.  The Rivermead Mobility Index: a further development of the Rivermead Motor Assessment. , 1991, International disability studies.

[9]  B. E. Maki,et al.  Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument. , 1992, Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.

[10]  M. Maležič,et al.  Treadmill training with partial body weight support compared with physiotherapy in nonambulatory hemiparetic patients. , 1995, Stroke.

[11]  B. Martin-Harris,et al.  Treating Swallowing Disorders following Stroke. , 1996, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[12]  M. Majsak,et al.  Application of Motor Learning Principles to the Stroke Population. , 1996, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[13]  H. Barbeau,et al.  A new approach to retrain gait in stroke patients through body weight support and treadmill stimulation. , 1998, Stroke.

[14]  M. Hallett,et al.  Rapid plasticity of human cortical movement representation induced by practice. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  Palmer Encyclopedia of biostatistics , 1999, BMJ.

[16]  S. Hesse,et al.  Development of an Advanced Mechanised Gait Trainer, Controlling Movement of the Centre of Mass, for Restoring Gait in Non-ambulant Subjects - Weiterentwicklung eines mechanisierten Gangtrainers mit Steuerung des Massenschwerpunktes zur Gangrehabilitation rollstuhlpflichtiger Patienten , 1999, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[17]  V. Dietz,et al.  Treadmill training of paraplegic patients using a robotic orthosis. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[18]  J. Liepert,et al.  Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. , 2000, Stroke.

[19]  M. Reding,et al.  Comparison of Partial Body Weight-Supported Treadmill Gait Training Versus Aggressive Bracing Assisted Walking Post Stroke , 2000, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[20]  V. Dietz,et al.  Long term effects of locomotor training in spinal humans , 2001, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[21]  E. Protas,et al.  A comparison of regular rehabilitation and regular rehabilitation with supported treadmill ambulation training for acute stroke patients. , 2001, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[22]  Y Laufer,et al.  The effect of treadmill training on the ambulation of stroke survivors in the early stages of rehabilitation: a randomized study. , 2001, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[23]  B. Sjölund,et al.  Walking training of patients with hemiparesis at an early stage after stroke: a comparison of walking training on a treadmill with body weight support and walking training on the ground , 2001, Clinical rehabilitation.

[24]  T. Elbert,et al.  New treatments in neurorehabiliation founded on basic research , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[25]  A. Pollock,et al.  Treadmill Training and Body Weight Support for Walking After Stroke , 2003, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[26]  S Hesse,et al.  Aerobic treadmill plus Bobath walking training improves walking in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial , 2004, Clinical rehabilitation.

[27]  Roger P. Woods,et al.  Ankle dorsiflexion as an fMRI paradigm to assay motor control for walking during rehabilitation , 2004, NeuroImage.

[28]  A. Sterr,et al.  Intensive training in chronic upper limb hemiparesis does not increase spasticity or synergies , 2004, Neurology.

[29]  Fernando Costa,et al.  Physical activity and exercise recommendations for stroke survivors: an American Heart Association scientific statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Subcommittee on Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention; the Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; the Council on Nutrition, Physical , 2004, Stroke.

[30]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence? , 2004, Clinical rehabilitation.

[31]  E. Roth,et al.  Physical activity and exercise recommendations for stroke survivors: an American Heart Association scientific statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Subcommittee on Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention; the Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; the Council on Nutrition, Physical , 2004, Circulation.

[32]  Van Peppen,et al.  The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke : what ’ s the evidence ? , 2004 .

[33]  Andreas R. Luft,et al.  Brain activation of lower extremity movement in chronically impaired stroke survivors , 2005, NeuroImage.

[34]  A. Hicks,et al.  Long-term body-weight-supported treadmill training and subsequent follow-up in persons with chronic SCI: effects on functional walking ability and measures of subjective well-being , 2005, Spinal Cord.

[35]  I. Tarkka,et al.  The effectiveness of body weight-supported gait training and floor walking in patients with chronic stroke. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[36]  H. Barbeau,et al.  Description and application of a system for locomotor rehabilitation , 1987, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[37]  L. Ada,et al.  Relation between spasticity, weakness and contracture of the elbow flexors and upper limb activity after stroke: An observational study , 2006, Disability and rehabilitation.

[38]  Alfred D. Grant Gait Analysis: Normal and Pathological Function , 2010 .