Acoustic memory and the perception of speech

Abstract The nature of acoustic memory and its relationship to the categorizing process in speech perception is investigated in three experiments on the serial recall of lists of syllables. The first study confirms previous reports that sequences comprising the syllables, bah, dah , and gah show neither enhanced retention when presented auditorily rather than visually, nor a recency effect—both occurred with sequences in which vowel sounds differed ( bee, bih, boo ). This was found not to be a simple vowel-consonant difference since acoustic memory effects did occur with consonant sequences that were acoustically more discriminable ( sha, ma, ga and ash, am, ag ). Further experiments used the stimulus suffix effect to provide evidence of acoustic memory, and showed (1), increasing the acoustic similarity of the set grossly impairs acoustic memory effects for vowels as well as consonants, and (2) such memory effects are no greater for steady-state vowels than for continuously changing diphthongs. It is concluded that the usefulness of the information that can be retrieved from acoustic memory depends on the acoustic similarity of the items in the list rather than on their phonetic class or whether or not they have “encoded” acoustic cues. These results question whether there is any psychological evidence for “encoded” speech sounds being categorized in ways different from other speech sounds.

[1]  B. C. Griffith,et al.  The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  M. Studdert-Kennedy,et al.  On the role of formant transitions in vowel recognition. , 1967, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  R. G. Crowder,et al.  Precategorical acoustic storage (PAS) , 1969 .

[4]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  An auditory analogue of the sperling partial report procedure: Evidence for brief auditory storage , 1972 .

[5]  J. Cutting Ear Advantage for Stops and Liquids in Initial and Final Position , 1973 .

[6]  Robert G. Crowder,et al.  The sound of vowels and consonants in immediate memory , 1971 .

[7]  A. House,et al.  Perception of dichotically presented vowels. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  C. J. Darwin,et al.  Dichotic Backward Masking of Complex Sounds , 1971, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[9]  M. Haggard Encoding and the rea for speech signals , 1971, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  C. Darwin Ear Differences in the Recall of Fricatives and Vowels , 1971, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  Robert A. Smallwood,et al.  Acoustic interference with redundant elements , 1971 .

[12]  D. Massaro Preperceptual auditory images. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  D. Broadbent,et al.  Information Conveyed by Vowels , 1957 .

[14]  E. Williams Experimental Designs Balanced for the Estimation of Residual Effects of Treatments , 1949 .

[15]  D. Shankweiler,et al.  Opposed Effects of a Delayed Channel on Perception of Dichotically and Monotically Presented CV Syllables , 1970 .

[16]  R. G. Crowder,et al.  Representation of speech sounds in precategorical acoustic storage. , 1973, Journal of experimental psychology.

[17]  M. Studdert-Kennedy,et al.  Identification of Consonants and Vowels Presented to Left and Right Ears* , 1967, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[18]  Alvin M. Liberman,et al.  Language Codes and Memory Codes. , 1971 .

[19]  A M Liberman,et al.  Perception of the speech code. , 1967, Psychological review.

[20]  R. Cole Different memory functions for consonants and vowels , 1973 .

[21]  J. M. Pickett,et al.  Perception of Vowels Heard in Noises of Various Spectra , 1957 .

[22]  J. Morton,et al.  Experiments with the stimulus suffix effect. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[23]  A. Liberman,et al.  The Identification and Discrimination of Synthetic Vowels , 1962 .

[24]  A Parallel between Degree of Encodedness and the Ear Advantage: Evidence from an Ear‐Monitoring Task , 1973 .

[25]  G. A. Miller,et al.  An Analysis of Perceptual Confusions Among Some English Consonants , 1955 .