Is the chemical gate of connexins voltage sensitive? Behavior of Cx32 wild-type and mutant channels.

Connexin channels are gated by transjunctional voltage ( V j) or CO2 via distinct mechanisms. The cytoplasmic loop (CL) and arginines of a COOH-terminal domain (CT1) of connexin32 (Cx32) were shown to determine CO2sensitivity, and a gating mechanism involving CL-CT1 association-dissociation was proposed. This study reports that Cx32 mutants, tandem, 5R/E, and 5R/N, designed to weaken CL-CT1interactions, display atypical V jand CO2 sensitivities when tested heterotypically with Cx32 wild-type channels in Xenopus oocytes. In tandems, two Cx32 monomers are linked NH2-to-COOH terminus. In 5R/E and 5R/N mutants, glutamates or asparagines replace CT1 arginines. On the basis of the intriguing sensitivity of the mutant-32 channel to V jpolarity, the existence of a "slow gate" distinct from the conventional V jgate is proposed. To a lesser extent the slow gate manifests itself also in homotypic Cx32 channels. Mutant-32 channels are more CO2 sensitive than homotypic Cx32 channels, and CO2-induced chemical gating is reversed with relative depolarization of the mutant oocyte, suggesting V jsensitivity of chemical gating. A hypothetical pore-plugging model involving an acidic cytosolic protein (possibly calmodulin) is discussed.

[1]  Molecular dissection of a basic COOH-terminal domain of Cx32 that inhibits gap junction gating sensitivity. , 1998, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[2]  C. Peracchia,et al.  Connexin domains relevant to the chemical gating of gap junction channels. , 1997, Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas.

[3]  M Delmar,et al.  PH regulation of connexin43: molecular analysis of the gating particle. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[4]  M. Bennett,et al.  Gap junctions formed by connexins 26 and 32 alone and in combination are differently affected by applied voltage. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  K. Fischbeck,et al.  Connexin mutations in X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. , 1993, Science.

[6]  I. Mills,et al.  Inhibition of endosome fusion by wortmannin persists in the presence of activated Rab5. , 1998, Molecular biology of the cell.

[7]  C. Peracchia,et al.  Chemical Gating of Heteromeric and Heterotypic Gap Junction Channels , 1998, The Journal of Membrane Biology.

[8]  Intramolecular interactions mediate pH regulation of connexin43 channels. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[9]  F. Bukauskas,et al.  Two distinct gating mechanisms in gap junction channels: CO2-sensitive and voltage-sensitive. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[10]  C. Peracchia,et al.  Connexin 32/38 chimeras suggest a role for the second half of inner loop in gap junction gating by low pH. , 1996, The American journal of physiology.

[11]  C. Peracchia,et al.  Positive charges of the initial C-terminus domain of Cx32 inhibit gap junction gating sensitivity to CO2. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[12]  Feliksas F. Bukauskas,et al.  Long-chain n-alkanols and arachidonic acid interfere with the Vm-sensitive gating mechanism of gap junction channels , 1997, Pflügers Archiv.

[13]  V. Ionasescu,et al.  Point mutations of the connexin32 (GJB1) gene in X-linked dominant Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy. , 1994, Human molecular genetics.

[14]  A. Lazrak,et al.  CHAPTER 24 – Molecular Models of Channel Interaction and Gating in Gap Junctions , 1994 .

[15]  D. Pham‐Dinh,et al.  Connexin32 Mutations Associated with X-Linked Charcot–Marie–Tooth Disease Show Two Distinct Behaviors: Loss of Function and Altered Gating Properties , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  R. Bruzzone,et al.  Connections with connexins: the molecular basis of direct intercellular signaling. , 1996, European journal of biochemistry.

[17]  R. Werner,et al.  Gating properties of connexin32 cell—cell channels and their mutants expressed in Xenopusoocytes , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  D. Paul Molecular cloning of cDNA for rat liver gap junction protein , 1986, The Journal of cell biology.

[19]  J. Jalife,et al.  A structural basis for the unequal sensitivity of the major cardiac and liver gap junctions to intracellular acidification: the carboxyl tail length. , 1993, Biophysical journal.

[20]  W. Loewenstein Cell-to-cell communication and the control of growth. , 1990, The American review of respiratory disease.

[21]  D C Spray,et al.  Equilibrium properties of a voltage-dependent junctional conductance , 1981, The Journal of general physiology.

[22]  C. A. Thomas,et al.  Molecular cloning. , 1977, Advances in pathobiology.

[23]  G. Perkins,et al.  Three-dimensional structure of the gap junction connexon. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[24]  C. Ginter,et al.  Opposite voltage gating polarities of two closely related onnexins , 1994, Nature.