A Non aqueous Formulation for Efficient Detoxification of Chemical Weapons at Sub zero Temperatures

An effective decontamination methodology based on nucleophilic non-aqueous decontaminant has been developed against chemical weapons sulfur mustard and soman. This new formulation consists of non-aqueous solution of 2-aminoethanol (60%, w/v), potassium hydroxide (2%, w/v), and N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (38 %, w/v) and detoxified more than 99 % of sulfur mustard and soman within a period of 30 min at -35 °C. It was found to be operable over a wide range of temperatures starting from -35 °C to +55 °C without losing its fluidity and detoxicant efficiency at sub-zero temperatures promising hassle-free application against chemical weapons. It degrades sulfur mustard to divinyl sulfide and 2-chloroethyl vinyl sulfide and converted soman into O-pinacolyl O’-(2-amino) ethyl methylphosphonate, which are relatively non toxic to humans. This formulation is environmentally benign, relatively non corrosive and has an improved capability to dissolve and decontaminate chemical weapons within 15 minutes at ambient conditions. This approach paves the way for efficient and rapid decontamination platform for chemical weapons and holds considerable promise for field application in near future.

[1]  Virendra V. Singh,et al.  Photoelectrocatalytic degradation of vesicant agent using Eu/ZnO/pPy nanocomposite. , 2019, Environmental pollution.

[2]  Jinxing Yang,et al.  Nucleophilic Degradation of Chemical Warfare Agents Using Nonaqueous Decontamination Formula , 2017 .

[3]  Sirilak Sattayasamitsathit,et al.  Multifunctional Silver‐Exchanged Zeolite Micromotors for Catalytic Detoxification of Chemical and Biological Threats , 2015 .

[4]  Kibong Kim,et al.  Destruction and detection of chemical warfare agents. , 2011, Chemical reviews.

[5]  Rajeev Goel,et al.  Chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear decontamination: Recent trends and future perspective , 2010, Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences.

[6]  David C. Sorrick,et al.  All-Weather Hydrogen Peroxide-Based Decontamination of CBRN Contaminants , 2010 .

[7]  Hai-yan Zhu,et al.  Transportation of sulfur mustard (HD) in alkyd coating. , 2007, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[8]  C M Boone,et al.  Present State of CBRN Decontamination Methodologies (Stand van Zaken CBRN- Ontsmettingsmethodieken) , 2007 .

[9]  Z. Witkiewicz,et al.  The reactions of sulfur mustard with the active components of organic decontaminants. , 2005, Journal of hazardous materials.

[10]  G. Wagner,et al.  Rapid Nucleophilic/Oxidative Decontamination of Chemical Warfare Agents , 2002 .

[11]  B. M. Huey,et al.  Strategies to Protect the Health of Deployed U.S. Forces: Force Protection and Decontamination , 1999 .

[12]  Yu-Chu Yang Chemical Detoxification of Nerve Agent VX , 1999 .

[13]  Carlton T. Phillips,et al.  Aquatic Toxicity of Decontaminating Solutions DS-2/DS-2P , 1994 .

[14]  Gerald J. Niemi,et al.  Structural features associated with degradable and persistent chemicals , 1987 .

[15]  Alan J. Parker,et al.  Protic-dipolar aprotic solvent effects on rates of bimolecular reactions , 1969 .

[16]  D. Kah,et al.  Fate of sulfur mustard on soil: Evaporation, degradation, and vapor emission. , 2017, Environmental pollution.

[17]  Lionel M. Raff,et al.  Principles of Physical Chemistry , 2001 .

[18]  S. Chow,et al.  The biodegradation of N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone in water by sewage bacteria , 1983 .

[19]  A. Parker The effects of solvation on the properties of anions in dipolar aprotic solvents , 1962 .

[20]  R. Vijayaraghavan,et al.  Decontamination of Chemical Warfare Agents , 2022 .