Driving Factors behind Successful Carpool Formation and Use

Sustainable transportation options are receiving increasing attention in cities across North America because of rising commute times, fluctuating fuel prices, and increased awareness of the environmental impacts of transportation choices. Carpooling represents one of many possible alternatives to single-occupancy vehicle use for work or school trips. Recent attempts to encourage carpool formation in Canada include web-based applications that facilitate connections between potential carpoolers. One such example is Carpool Zone, a service provided by Smart Commute in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton area. The service is coordinated regionally by the Smart Commute Team at Metrolinx (the regional transportation planning authority) and is free and open to the public. Data are used from Smart Commute to investigate the carpool formation and use process. Results from a logistic regression analysis of carpool use suggest that spatial accessibility to matches, household auto ownership, and sociodemographics influence carpooling more than do proximity to carpool infrastructure and personal attitudes (e.g., concern for the environment, cost). With respect to policy and planning, results suggest that increasing shared knowledge about commuting patterns at the home end of work trips could yield beneficial returns to the carpool formation and use process.

[1]  Patrick M. Kline,et al.  Relational Costs and the Production of Social Capital: Evidence from Carpooling , 2002 .

[2]  Hai Yang,et al.  The models and economics of carpools , 2000 .

[3]  Robert Cervero,et al.  Factors influencing commuting choices in suburban labor markets: A case analysis of Pleasanton, California , 1988 .

[4]  Alan E Pisarski,et al.  New NCHRP-TCRP Report: Commuting in America III: The Third National Report on Commuting Patterns and Trends , 2006 .

[5]  Sherry Ryan,et al.  Suburban attitudes toward policies aimed at reducing solo driving , 1998 .

[6]  Erik Ferguson DEMOGRAPHICS OF CARPOOLING , 1995 .

[7]  Erik Ferguson,et al.  The influence of employer ridesharing programs on employee mode choice , 1990 .

[8]  Stephen Graham Information Technologies and Reconfigurations of Urban Space , 2001 .

[9]  Arthur Getis,et al.  Research Commentary: Increasing the Flexibility of Legacy Systems , 2011, Int. J. Appl. Geospat. Res..

[10]  A. Pisarski Commuting in America II: The Second National Report on Commuting Patterns and Trends , 1996 .

[11]  D. Shoup Evaluating the effects of cashing out employer-paid parking: Eight case studies , 1997 .

[12]  B. Taylor Putting a Price on Mobility: Cars and Contradictions in Planning , 2006 .

[13]  John Collura EVALUATING RIDE-SHARING PROGRAMS - MASSACHUSETTS EXPERIENCE , 1994 .

[14]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Living in Two Worlds: A Review of Home-to-Work Decisions , 2004 .

[15]  G. Giuliano Transportation Demand Management: Promise or Panacea? , 1992 .

[16]  Vittorio Maniezzo,et al.  A distributed geographic information system for the daily car pooling problem , 2004, Comput. Oper. Res..

[17]  Justin Ray Winn An analysis of casual carpool passenger behavior in Houston, Texas , 2005 .

[18]  R. Crane Is There a Quiet Revolution in Women's Travel? Revisiting the Gender Gap in Commuting , 2007 .

[19]  F. Cristaldi Commuting and Gender in Italy: A Methodological Issue , 2005 .

[20]  Mary Lynn Tischer,et al.  An empirical analysis of behavioral intentions of single-occupant auto drivers to shift to high occupancy vehicles , 1979 .

[21]  Genevieve Giuliano,et al.  Impact of high occupancy vehicle lanes on carpooling behavior , 1990 .

[22]  C. Morency The ambivalence of ridesharing , 2007 .

[23]  Kevin Washbrook,et al.  Estimating commuter mode choice: A discrete choice analysis of the impact of road pricing and parking charges , 2006 .

[24]  Frank S. Koppelman,et al.  Representing the differences between female and male commute behavior in residential location choice models , 2001 .

[25]  R. Teal Carpooling: Who, how and why☆ , 1987 .

[26]  THE COST OF URBAN CONGESTION IN CANADA , 2007 .

[27]  M. Meyer,et al.  Demand management as an element of transportation policy: using carrots and sticks to influence travel behavior , 1999 .

[28]  Da-Jie Lin,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Factors in Estimating the Potential of Ride-sharing for Demand Reduction , 1999 .

[29]  Abraham D. Horowitz,et al.  RIDE SHARING TO WORK: AN ATTITUDINAL ANALYSIS , 1977 .

[30]  E. Ferguson The rise and fall of the American carpool: 1970–1990 , 1997 .