The Impact of Improving the Quality of the Port’s Infrastructure on the Shippers’ Decisions

Important attributes of a transportation chain are the costs of their operation, the security of supply they provide, and reducing carbon emissions throughout the chain. When making managerial decisions about the chain configuration, shippers consider the optimal choice of means of transport, carriers, or ports. Seaports, as transport nodes, determine the functioning of supply chains they serve. A constant process observed in the world shipping is the consistent increase in the average size of ships. Adapting the port and port access infrastructure to the changes observed in the world shipping is a prerequisite for maintaining the competitive position of the port, and consequently of the entire transport chain. Adequate hydrological conditions ensuring safe access to ports for increasingly larger ships are necessary for the stable functioning and development of a port and the entire region. For shippers, the certainty that the handling of larger vessels is assured regardless of any fluctuating hydro-meteorological conditions and temporary vessel entry permits is a guarantee of security of supply. This study aims to demonstrate the impact of fairway deepening on port-oriented supply chain costs and security of supply, as well as verification of the importance of these factors for cargo shippers' decision-making. The article used the case study method based on the port of Szczecin, for which the investment of deepening the fairway to 12.5 m is being implemented. The article estimates the transport costs of five transport chains served by the port of Szczecin. Our research showed that a 2.5 m increase in the permissible draught of ships results in a decrease of up to 25% in transport costs resulting mainly from the reduction in specific fuel consumption throughout the chain. The analysis of the results showed that a secondary benefit of deepening the fairway can change the structure of the port’s foreland. This conclusion was validated by means of in-depth interviews held with selected shippers cooperating with the port of Szczecin. An additional outcome of the interviews was identification of the remaining conditions that should be met to take full advantage of improved port accessibility. The research is the first step to broader studies assessing whether improving quality of port infrastructure can contribute to a reduction in emissions from ships in a port and thus facilitate the transition to zero-emission ports.

[1]  H. Doukas,et al.  A multi-criteria decision support framework for assessing seaport sustainability planning: the case of Piraeus , 2022, Maritime Policy & Management.

[2]  H. Haralambides,et al.  Port competitiveness: Do container terminal operators and liner shipping companies see eye to eye? , 2022, Marine Policy.

[3]  B. Tovar,et al.  The relationship between port-level maritime connectivity and efficiency , 2022, Journal of Transport Geography.

[4]  Julián Martínez-Moya,et al.  Do shippers’ characteristics influence port choice criteria? Capturing heterogeneity by using latent class models , 2021, Transport Policy.

[5]  R. Lindsey,et al.  Port adaptation to climate change and capacity investments under uncertainty , 2021, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological.

[6]  L. Gucma,et al.  Modeling of Vessel Traffic Flow for Waterway Design–Port of Świnoujście Case Study , 2021, Applied Sciences.

[7]  L. Feng,et al.  Impacts of the choice habits of port users on the effects and efficiencies of port investment , 2020 .

[8]  I. Losada,et al.  Climate change risk to global port operations , 2020, Nature Climate Change.

[9]  Yi-Chih Yang,et al.  Adaptation strategies for port infrastructure and facilities under climate change at the Kaohsiung port , 2020 .

[10]  Arkadiusz Kozłowski,et al.  Key factors of container port competitiveness: A global shipping lines perspective , 2020 .

[11]  Meiling Liu Research on Port Infrastructure, Port Efficiency and Urban Trade Development , 2020, Journal of Coastal Research.

[12]  Jasmine Siu Lee Lam,et al.  A review of energy efficiency in ports: Operational strategies, technologies and energy management systems , 2019, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[13]  Lorena Garcia-Alonso,et al.  Port competition through hinterland accessibility: the case of Spain , 2019 .

[14]  J. Arellana,et al.  Assessing the impact of major infrastructure projects on port choice decision: The Colombian case , 2019, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice.

[15]  Mateusz Piwowarski,et al.  Application of EEG Metrics in the Decision-Making Process , 2018, Experimental and Quantitative Methods in Contemporary Economics.

[16]  M. Junginger,et al.  The dynamics of the global wood pellet markets and trade – key regions, developments and impact factors , 2018, Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining.

[17]  Izabela Kotowska,et al.  The Competitiveness of Inland Shipping in Serving the Hinterland of the Seaports: A Case Study of the Oder Waterway and the Szczecin-Świnoujście Port Complex , 2018, Integration as Solution for Advanced Smart Urban Transport Systems.

[18]  Kevin X. Li,et al.  Port competition with accessibility and congestion: a theoretical framework and literature review on empirical studies , 2018 .

[19]  Ziaul Haque Munim,et al.  The impacts of port infrastructure and logistics performance on economic growth: the mediating role of seaborne trade , 2018 .

[20]  Julián Martínez Moya,et al.  Port choice in container market: a literature review , 2017 .

[21]  Y. Lun,et al.  Connecting the world through global shipping networks , 2017 .

[22]  K. H. Wong,et al.  Strategy formulation of new generation ports: A case study of Hong Kong International Terminals Ltd. (HIT) , 2017 .

[23]  Sang-Yoon Lee,et al.  Forecasting container port volume: implications for dredging , 2017 .

[24]  Francesco Parola,et al.  The drivers of port competitiveness: a critical review , 2017 .

[25]  N. Mittal,et al.  Shippers’ Changing Priorities in Port Selection Decision – A Survey Analysis Using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) , 2016 .

[26]  J. Thill,et al.  Shipping route choice across geographies: Coastal vs. landlocked countries , 2016 .

[27]  Hawa Mohamed Ismael,et al.  Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Port Competitiveness in West Africa Using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) , 2015 .

[28]  Gerard de Jong,et al.  Port and Inland Mode Choice from the Exporters’ and Forwarders’ Perspectives: Case Study – Java, Indonesia , 2015 .

[29]  Thierry Vanelslander,et al.  The container transport system: Selection criteria and business attractiveness for North-European ports , 2015, Maritime Economics & Logistics.

[30]  Hui Shan Loh,et al.  Management of disruptions by seaports: preliminary findings , 2015 .

[31]  M. V. Geenhuizen,et al.  Port infrastructure investment and regional economic growth in China: Panel evidence in port regions and provinces , 2014 .

[32]  Jun Shan,et al.  An empirical investigation of the seaport’s economic impact: Evidence from major ports in China , 2014 .

[33]  Michele Acciaro,et al.  Energy management in seaports: A new role for port authorities , 2014 .

[34]  M. Brooks,et al.  Port Investment and Container Shipping Markets: Roundtable Summary and Conclusions , 2014 .

[35]  R C Vandenberg,et al.  The North Carolina Maritime Strategy: Enhancing the North Carolina Economy through Investments in the State's Maritime Infrastructure , 2013 .

[36]  Adams B. Steven,et al.  Choosing a port: An analysis of containerized imports into the US , 2012 .

[37]  Waiman Cheung,et al.  Port competitiveness from the users' perspective: An analysis of major container ports in China and its neighboring countries , 2012 .

[38]  Claudio Ferrari,et al.  Measuring the quality of port hinterland accessibility: The Ligurian case , 2011 .

[39]  Li Huang,et al.  The Impact of Port Infrastructure on Port Handling Capacity in China , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Management and Service Science.

[40]  Alfonso Morvillo,et al.  Activities, resources and inter-organizational relationships: key factors in port competitiveness , 2008 .

[41]  F. J. Noya Arquero,et al.  New port facilities at Punta Langosteira, Spain , 2008 .

[42]  Gi-Tae Yeo,et al.  Evaluating the competitiveness of container ports in Korea and China , 2008 .

[43]  Mateus Magala,et al.  A New Approach to Port Choice Modelling , 2008 .

[44]  B. Slack,et al.  The Geography of Transport Systems , 2006 .

[45]  Kevin Cullinane,et al.  Port competition between Shanghai and Ningbo , 2005 .

[46]  J. Tongzon,et al.  Port privatization, efficiency and competitiveness: Some empirical evidence from container ports (terminals) , 2005 .

[47]  J. Whitney Case Study Research , 1999 .

[48]  Magdalena Kaup,et al.  The Port Community System as an example of integration of port users , 2021, KES.

[49]  J. Kizielewicz Identifying Actions to Prepare Electricity Infrastructure in Seaports for Future Power Supplying Cruise Ships with Energy from Land , 2021 .

[50]  N. Wagner,et al.  IMPROVING SEAPORT COMPETITIVENESS BY CREATING A CONNECTION TO THE NATIONAL RAIL NETWORK , 2020 .

[51]  Izabela Kotowska,et al.  Socio-economic Costs and Benefits of Seaport Infrastructure Development for a Local Environment. The Case of the Port and the City of Świnoujście , 2020 .

[52]  N. Wagner Sustainability in Port Cities – a Bibliometric Approach , 2019, Transportation Research Procedia.

[53]  J. Pettersson,et al.  Lyttelton Port channel deepening: Two key strategies for successful project delivery in a complex social and environmental context , 2019 .

[54]  C. Ferrari,et al.  Port infrastructures and trade: Empirical evidence from Brazil , 2018 .

[55]  D. Bernacki,et al.  Socio-Economic Benefits of the Improvement of Transport Accessibility to the Port of Szczecin , 2016 .

[56]  L. Lonza,et al.  Ports as Drivers of Urban and Regional Growth , 2016 .

[57]  C. Canel A case study: examination of the economic consequences of a rejected fairway adjustment for the port of Hamburg , 2016 .

[58]  Thierry Vanelslander,et al.  Port competitiveness determinants of selected European ports in the containerized cargo market , 2010 .

[59]  J. Tongzon Port Choice and Freight Forwarders , 2009 .

[60]  de Pw Peter Langen,et al.  Port competition and selection in contestable hinterlands; the case of Austria , 2007, European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research.