Connectivity providers for semi-aquatic vertebrates: the case of the endangered otter in Italy

Modeling habitat connectivity for conservation of semi-aquatic vertebrates is a particularly challenging task, due to the fine-scale and linear distribution of riverine habitats and to the capacity of species to move both on freshwater and terrestrial realms. We showed how the integrated analytical framework provided by the habitat availability (reachability) metrics and their fractions can be used to effectively evaluate the distinctive roles and contributions of both habitat patches (aquatic and riparian) and linkage areas (permeable land matrix) to the connectivity and functioning of a complex system composed of multiple river catchments. Analysis focused on the Eurasian otter (Lutra lutra L.), one of the most endangered mammals in Italy. We developed a network connectivity model based on suitable otter habitats and multiple least-cost paths between catchments. A graph analytical approach was used to identify critical nodes and links for the potential expansion and long-term viability of the species in the region. Our results showed that few basins concentrate most of the importance for sustaining the overall habitat connectivity, due to the extension of suitable habitats they contain, their strong connections with other basins, and their importance as stepping stones that uphold ecological fluxes between otherwise weakly connected habitats. The potential contribution of each basin to enhance the dispersal and expansion of otters in the area strongly depended on the key functional paths (sequences of links and nodes) among the catchments. We identified vacant basins that could be colonized by otters in the near future, and connecting areas in the intermediate matrix that might be preferentially used to conduct and promote dispersal movements and gene flow in the area. The novel approach here adopted could be easily extended to other semiaquatic species and catchment systems, offering a management strategy to preserve the hydrographic network as an integrated system, as well as a joint evaluation of the role of both the river courses and the matrix in between in a single landscape model.

[1]  W. Fagan,et al.  Living in the branches: population dynamics and ecological processes in dendritic networks. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[2]  Andrew Fall,et al.  The sensitivity of least-cost habitat graphs to relative cost surface values , 2010, Landscape Ecology.

[3]  A. Loy,et al.  SURVEY AND HABITAT EVALUATION FOR A PERIPHERAL POPULATION OF THE EURASIAN OTTER IN ITALY , 2004 .

[4]  E. Randi,et al.  ESTIMATION OF EUROPEAN OTTER (LUTRA LUTRA) POPULATION SIZE BY FECAL DNA TYPING IN SOUTHERN ITALY , 2006 .

[5]  P. Defourny,et al.  The recovery of the otter in the Cevennes (France): a GIS-based model , 2006 .

[6]  Juan Jiménez,et al.  Testing the surveys and visual and track censuses of Eurasian otters ( Lutra lutra ) , 2001 .

[7]  C. Prigioni,et al.  How many otters are there in Italy , 2006 .

[8]  Ferenc Jordán,et al.  Contribution of habitat patches to network connectivity: Redundancy and uniqueness of topological indices , 2011 .

[9]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Conservation planning for connectivity across marine, freshwater, and terrestrial realms , 2010 .

[10]  R. Fusillo,et al.  Assessing range re-expansion and recolonization of human-impacted landscapes by threatened species: a case study of the otter (Lutra lutra) in Italy , 2009, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[11]  H. Kruuk.  Wild Otters: Predation and Populations , 1995 .

[12]  Justin M. Calabrese,et al.  A comparison-shopper's guide to connectivity metrics , 2004 .

[13]  A. Loy,et al.  Otter Lutra lutra population expansion: assessing habitat suitability and connectivity in southern Italy. , 2009 .

[14]  A. Prang,et al.  Habitat factors and the presence or absence of otters Lutra lutra in Denmark , 2001, Acta Theriologica.

[15]  E. Virgós,et al.  Changes in otter Lutra lutra distribution in Central Spain in the 1964-1995 period , 1998 .

[16]  Caroline Pollock,et al.  2000 IUCN red list of threatened species , 2000 .

[17]  V. Loeschcke,et al.  Genetic structure in otter (Lutra lutra) populations in Europe: implications for conservation , 2003 .

[18]  Hans Kruuk,et al.  Otters: Ecology, Behaviour and Conservation , 2006 .

[19]  Nicolas Ray,et al.  pathmatrix: a geographical information system tool to compute effective distances among samples , 2005 .

[20]  J. Ragle,et al.  IUCN Red List of Threatened Species , 2010 .

[21]  Robert S Schick,et al.  Graph models of habitat mosaics. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[22]  Ward,et al.  Biodiversity: towards a unifying theme for river ecology , 2001 .

[23]  Timothy H. Keitt,et al.  LANDSCAPE CONNECTIVITY: A GRAPH‐THEORETIC PERSPECTIVE , 2001 .

[24]  J. Wiens.  Riverine landscapes: taking landscape ecology into the water , 2002 .

[25]  Santiago Saura,et al.  Ranking individual habitat patches as connectivity providers: Integrating network analysis and patch removal experiments , 2010 .

[26]  Dénes Schmera,et al.  Network thinking in riverscape conservation – A graph-based approach , 2011 .

[27]  D. Macdonald,et al.  Patterns of otter Lutra lutra road mortality in Britain , 1999 .

[28]  C. Mason,et al.  Otters: Ecology and Conservation , 1986 .

[29]  Santiago Saura,et al.  Conefor Sensinode 2.2: A software package for quantifying the importance of habitat patches for landscape connectivity , 2009, Environ. Model. Softw..

[30]  L. Boitani,et al.  Modelling semi-aquatic vertebrates' distribution at the drainage basin scale: The case of the otter Lutra lutra in Italy , 2009 .

[31]  Santiago Saura,et al.  A new habitat availability index to integrate connectivity in landscape conservation planning : Comparison with existing indices and application to a case study , 2007 .

[32]  Erik Matthysen,et al.  The application of 'least-cost' modelling as a functional landscape model , 2003 .

[33]  L. Boitani,et al.  Survey of an otterLutra lutra population in Southern Italy: site occupancy and influence of sampling season on species detection , 2007, Acta Theriologica.

[34]  A. Hirzel,et al.  Do habitat suitability models reliably predict the recovery areas of threatened species , 2010 .

[35]  Yolanda F. Wiersma,et al.  A new measure of longitudinal connectivity for stream networks , 2008, Landscape Ecology.

[36]  Santiago Saura,et al.  A common currency for the different ways in which patches and links can contribute to habitat availability and connectivity in the landscape , 2010 .

[37]  L. Boitani,et al.  The Italian action plan for the endangered Eurasian otter Lutra lutra , 2010 .

[38]  J. Prenda,et al.  The relative influence of riparian habitat structure and fish availability on otter Lutra lutra L. sprainting activity in a small Mediterranean catchment , 1996 .

[39]  P. White,et al.  Factors affecting the success of an otter (Lutra lutra) reinforcement programme, as identified by post-translocation monitoring , 2003 .