The Use of Lego Technologies in Elementary Teacher Preparation

The need to reform science teacher preparation programs has been pointed out in research (Bryan and Abell in J Res Sci Teach 36:121–140, 1999; Bryan and Atwater in Sci Educ 8(6):821–839, 2002; Harrington and Hathaway in J Teach Educ 46(4):275–284, 1995). Science teachers are charged with the responsibility of incorporating both cognitive and non-cognitive parameters in their everyday teaching practices. This often results in their reluctance to teach science because they often lack disciplinary and/or pedagogical expertise required to promote science learning. The purpose of this study is to propose an alternative instructional approach in which Lego vehicles were used as a tool to promote pre-service elementary teachers’ development and to examine whether there are non-cognitive parameters that promote or obstruct them from using Lego Technologies as a teaching tool. The context of the study was defined by a teacher preparation program of a private university in a small Mediterranean country. A sample of 28 pre-service elementary teachers, working in five 5–6-member groups were involved in scientific inquiries, during which they had to use vehicles in order to solve scientific problems related to concepts such as gear functioning, force, and motion. The nature of their cognitive engagement in the scientific inquiry process, non-cognitive parameters contributing to their cognitive engagement, and the impact of their involvement in the process on their development were examined through qualitative analysis of pre- and post-inquiry interviews, presentations of their solutions to the scientific problems and of their personal reflective journals.

[1]  Martyn Hammersley,et al.  Ethnography : Principles in Practice , 1983 .

[2]  Greg Smith,et al.  The impact of a curriculum course on pre-service primary teachers' science content knowledge and attitudes towards teaching science , 2012 .

[3]  Mitchel Resnick,et al.  MultiLogo: A Study of Children and Concurrent Programming , 1990, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[4]  Carla Zembal-Saul,et al.  Learning to teach elementary school science as argument , 2009 .

[5]  Mai M. Sidawi.  Teaching science through designing technology , 2009 .

[6]  R. McCormick.  Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge , 1997 .

[7]  Sharan B. Merriam,et al.  Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation , 2009 .

[8]  J. Bencze,et al.  Promoting student-led science and technology projects in elementary teacher education: entry into core pedagogical practices through technological design , 2010 .

[9]  R. Evans,et al.  Reliability of the "Draw-a-Man" test. , 1975 .

[10]  Russel S. Hathaway,et al.  Illuminating Beliefs about Diversity , 1995 .

[11]  Lucy Avraamidou.  Prospective Elementary Teachers' Science Teaching Orientations and Experiences that Impacted their Development , 2013 .

[12]  Mary M. Atwater,et al.  Teacher beliefs and cultural models: A challenge for science teacher preparation programs , 2002 .

[13]  Sandra K. Abell,et al.  Constraints to teaching elementary science: A case study of a science enthusiast student teacher , 1992 .

[14]  A. Gokhale,et al.  Maintaining Positive Attitudes toward Science and Technology in First‐Year Female Undergraduates: Peril and promise , 2010 .

[15]  Herbert P. Ginsburg,et al.  Thoughts on the future of research on mathematics and science learning and education , 2004 .

[16]  Ken Appleton,et al.  How do Beginning Elementary Teachers Cope with Science: Development of Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Science , 1999 .

[17]  Jenny Murray,et al.  Inventors in the Making , 2005 .

[18]  G. Ireson,et al.  Fifteen pupils’ positive approach to primary school science: when does it decline? , 2010 .

[19]  Lynn A. Bryan,et al.  Nestedness of Beliefs: Examining a Prospective Elementary Teacher's Belief System about Science Teaching and Learning. , 2003 .

[20]  Jan H. van Driel,et al.  Taking a Closer Look at Science Teaching Orientations. , 2011 .

[21]  Ken Appleton,et al.  How Do Beginning Primary School Teachers Cope with Science? Toward an Understanding of Science Teaching Practice , 2003 .

[22]  Pasl A. Jalil,et al.  Autonomy in Science Education: A Practical Approach in Attitude Shifting Towards Science Learning , 2009 .

[23]  Rebecca Schneider,et al.  Science Teacher Learning Progressions , 2011 .

[24]  Lucy Avraamidou,et al.  Giving priority to evidence in science teaching: A first-year elementary teacher's specialized practices and knowledge , 2005 .

[25]  Gale M. Sinatra,et al.  The "Warming Trend" in Conceptual Change Research: The Legacy of Paul R. Pintrich , 2005 .

[26]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 1994 .

[27]  J. Creswell.  Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[28]  Elizabeth A. Davis,et al.  Challenges New Science Teachers Face , 2006 .

[29]  David E. Penner,et al.  Explaining systems: Investigating middle school students' understanding of emergent phenomena , 2000 .

[30]  Earl R. Glenn,et al.  National association for research in science teaching: National association for research in science teaching , 1929 .

[31]  Lynn A. Bryan,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE IN LEARNING TO TEACH ELEMENTARY SCIENCE , 1999 .

[32]  J. Krajcik,et al.  Nature, Sources, and Development of Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Science Teaching , 1999 .

[33]  Miia Rannikmäe,et al.  The Meaning of Scientific Literacy. , 2009 .

[34]  L. Shulman.  Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform , 1987 .

[35]  Carla Zembal-Saul,et al.  In search of well‐started beginning science teachers: Insights from two first‐year elementary teachers , 2010 .

[36]  Moshe Barak,et al.  Robotics projects and learning concepts in science, technology and problem solving , 2009 .

[37]  J. Bransford,et al.  Preparing Teachers for a Changing World: What Teachers Should Learn and Be Able to Do. , 2005 .

[38]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Learning science through technological design , 2001 .

[39]  Michael Carbonaro,et al.  Making a Connection between Computational Modeling and Educational Research , 2003 .

[40]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge , 2002 .

[41]  Allison Druin,et al.  Robots for Kids: Exploring New Technologies for Learning , 2000 .

[42]  Moshe Barak,et al.  Issues involved in attempting to develop independent learning in pupils working on technological projects , 2004 .

[43]  Angela Anning,et al.  Drawing Out Ideas: Graphicacy and Young Children , 1997 .

[44]  Moshe Barak,et al.  Using Portfolios To Enhance Creative Thinking. , 2000 .

[45]  Mike Carbonaro,et al.  Developing conceptual understanding of mechanical advantage through the use of Lego robotic technology , 2008 .

[46]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Beyond Cold Conceptual Change: The Role of Motivational Beliefs and Classroom Contextual Factors in the Process of Conceptual Change , 1993 .

[47]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[48]  Brent Mawson,et al.  Beyond `The Design Process': An Alternative Pedagogy for Technology Education , 2003 .

[49]  Terri E. Varnado.  The Effects of a Technological Problem Solving Activity on FIRST™ LEGO™ League Participants' Problem Solving Style and Performance , 2005 .

[50]  P. Atkinson,et al.  Making sense of qualitative data , 1996 .

[51]  Kathryn F. Cochran,et al.  Pedagogical Content Knowing: An Integrative Model for Teacher Preparation , 1993 .

[52]  E. Guba,et al.  Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Confluences. , 2005 .

[53]  M. R. Matthews.  Science teaching : the role of history and philosophy of science , 1994 .

[54]  Jae Wook Jeon,et al.  Introduction for Freshmen to Embedded Systems Using LEGO Mindstorms , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[55]  N. Brickhouse,et al.  What Kind of a Girl Does Science? The Construction of School Science Identities , 2000 .

[56]  Amanda Berry,et al.  Constructing CoRes—a Strategy for Building PCK in Pre-service Science Teacher Education , 2011 .