Early and multiple origins of metastatic lineages within primary tumors

Significance The knowledge that cancer is an evolutionary process is old, but only recently can sequencing technology provide data for clinically relevant evolutionary analyses of cancer. Approaches developed for evolutionary biology can reveal the relationship among clonal lineages, the ancestral states of gene sequences, and the timing of evolutionary events. We performed whole exome sequencing of cancer tissues from multiple sites of dozens of subjects, demonstrating nonlinear patterns of tumor progression and early origins of metastatic lineages and quantifying the times of occurrence of driver mutations. These findings direct research attention away from the search for genes that induce metastasis toward genes that are mutated early in tumorigenesis, providing therapeutic targets effective against both primary tumors and metastases. Many aspects of the evolutionary process of tumorigenesis that are fundamental to cancer biology and targeted treatment have been challenging to reveal, such as the divergence times and genetic clonality of metastatic lineages. To address these challenges, we performed tumor phylogenetics using molecular evolutionary models, reconstructed ancestral states of somatic mutations, and inferred cancer chronograms to yield three conclusions. First, in contrast to a linear model of cancer progression, metastases can originate from divergent lineages within primary tumors. Evolved genetic changes in cancer lineages likely affect only the proclivity toward metastasis. Single genetic changes are unlikely to be necessary or sufficient for metastasis. Second, metastatic lineages can arise early in tumor development, sometimes long before diagnosis. The early genetic divergence of some metastatic lineages directs attention toward research on driver genes that are mutated early in cancer evolution. Last, the temporal order of occurrence of driver mutations can be inferred from phylogenetic analysis of cancer chronograms, guiding development of targeted therapeutics effective against primary tumors and metastases.

[1]  Y. Tokuda,et al.  Fundamental study on the mechanism of DNA degradation in tissues fixed in formaldehyde. , 1990, Journal of clinical pathology.

[2]  M. Coptcoat,et al.  Measurement of in vivo urological tumour cell kinetics using multiparameter flow cytometry. Preliminary study. , 1991, British journal of urology.

[3]  R. Weinberg Tumor suppressor genes , 1993, Neuron.

[4]  V. Torri,et al.  Cell kinetics of human ovarian cancer with in vivo administration of bromodeoxyuridine. , 1994, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[5]  P. Stanton,et al.  Cell kinetics in vivo of human breast cancer , 1996, The British journal of surgery.

[6]  R. Kucherlapati,et al.  Mutation in the Mismatch Repair Gene Msh6 Causes Cancer Susceptibility , 1997, Cell.

[7]  B. Harfe,et al.  DNA mismatch repair and genetic instability. , 2000, Annual review of genetics.

[8]  D A Rew,et al.  Cell production rates in human tissues and tumours and their significance. Part II: clinical data. , 2000, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[9]  Richard D. Wood,et al.  Human DNA Repair Genes , 2001, Science.

[10]  N. Masumori,et al.  Growth rates of primary and metastatic lesions of renal cell carcinoma , 2001, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[11]  M. Schofield,et al.  DNA mismatch repair: molecular mechanisms and biological function. , 2003, Annual review of microbiology.

[12]  Joe W Gray,et al.  Evidence emerges for early metastasis and parallel evolution of primary and metastatic tumors. , 2003, Cancer cell.

[13]  J. Downward Targeting RAS signalling pathways in cancer therapy , 2003, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[14]  R. Hynes Metastatic Potential Generic Predisposition of the Primary Tumor or Rare, Metastatic Variants—Or Both? , 2003, Cell.

[15]  Michael P. Cummings,et al.  PAUP* [Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and Other Methods)] , 2004 .

[16]  W. Frankel,et al.  MSH6 missense mutations are often associated with no or low cancer susceptibility , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.

[17]  Tomas Lindahl,et al.  Human DNA repair genes, 2005. , 2005, Mutation research.

[18]  R. Demicheli,et al.  Does surgery unfavourably perturb the "natural history" of early breast cancer by accelerating the appearance of distant metastases? , 2005, European journal of cancer.

[19]  Derrick J. Zwickl Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion , 2006 .

[20]  Ziheng Yang,et al.  Computational Molecular Evolution , 2006 .

[21]  P. Leung,et al.  Gonadotropins and ovarian cancer. , 2007, Endocrine reviews.

[22]  Ziheng Yang PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. , 2007, Molecular biology and evolution.

[23]  Stella K Kang,et al.  Distribution of renal tumor growth rates determined by using serial volumetric CT measurements. , 2009, Radiology.

[24]  C. Klein,et al.  Parallel progression of primary tumours and metastases , 2009, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[25]  Gonçalo R. Abecasis,et al.  The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools , 2009, Bioinform..

[26]  Paula D. Bos,et al.  Metastasis: from dissemination to organ-specific colonization , 2009, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[27]  M. Lynch Rate, molecular spectrum, and consequences of human mutation , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  D. Bar-Sagi,et al.  Regulating the regulator: post-translational modification of RAS , 2011, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[29]  S. Mane,et al.  K+ Channel Mutations in Adrenal Aldosterone-Producing Adenomas and Hereditary Hypertension , 2011, Science.

[30]  Jeffrey P Townsend,et al.  Phylogenetic signal and noise: predicting the power of a data set to resolve phylogeny. , 2012, Systematic biology.

[31]  Maxim Teslenko,et al.  MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference and Model Choice Across a Large Model Space , 2012, Systematic biology.

[32]  A. Børresen-Dale,et al.  Mutational Processes Molding the Genomes of 21 Breast Cancers , 2012, Cell.

[33]  K. Kinzler,et al.  Cancer Genome Landscapes , 2013, Science.

[34]  Kevan M. Shokat,et al.  K-Ras(G12C) inhibitors allosterically control GTP affinity and effector interactions , 2013, Nature.

[35]  N. McGranahan,et al.  The causes and consequences of genetic heterogeneity in cancer evolution , 2013, Nature.

[36]  Steven A. Roberts,et al.  Mutational heterogeneity in cancer and the search for new cancer-associated genes , 2013 .

[37]  Peter Donnelly,et al.  Germline mutations in the proof-reading domains of POLE and POLD1 predispose to colorectal adenomas and carcinomas , 2012, Nature Genetics.

[38]  Giovanni Parmigiani,et al.  Half or more of the somatic mutations in cancers of self-renewing tissues originate prior to tumor initiation , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  Peter Donnelly,et al.  Germline mutations affecting the proofreading domains of POLE and POLD1 predispose to colorectal adenomas and carcinomas , 2013, Nature Genetics.

[40]  Shanghai Yu,et al.  SAR405838: an optimized inhibitor of MDM2-p53 interaction that induces complete and durable tumor regression. , 2014, Cancer research.

[41]  Esti Yeger-Lotem,et al.  Cancer Evolution Is Associated with Pervasive Positive Selection on Globally Expressed Genes , 2014, PLoS genetics.

[42]  D. Dietrich,et al.  Recurrent activating mutation in PRKACA in cortisol-producing adrenal tumors , 2014, Nature Genetics.

[43]  P. A. Futreal,et al.  Genomic architecture and evolution of clear cell renal cell carcinomas defined by multiregion sequencing , 2014, Nature Genetics.

[44]  G. Tseng,et al.  High Fidelity Copy Number Analysis of Formalin-Fixed and Paraffin-Embedded Tissues Using Affymetrix Cytoscan HD Chip , 2014, PloS one.

[45]  L. Saal,et al.  Molecular and genetic diversity in the metastatic process of melanoma , 2014, The Journal of pathology.

[46]  P. Stephens,et al.  A targeted next-generation sequencing assay detects a high frequency of therapeutically targetable alterations in primary and metastatic breast cancers: implications for clinical practice. , 2014, The oncologist.

[47]  J. Stivers,et al.  Microscopic mechanism of DNA damage searching by hOGG1 , 2014, Nucleic acids research.

[48]  S. Gabriel,et al.  Discovery and saturation analysis of cancer genes across 21 tumor types , 2014, Nature.

[49]  Obi L. Griffith,et al.  SciClone: Inferring Clonal Architecture and Tracking the Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Tumor Evolution , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[50]  R. Jain,et al.  Using tumour phylogenetics to identify the roots of metastasis in humans , 2015, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[51]  Woo Suk Hong,et al.  Inferring the Origin of Metastases from Cancer Phylogenies. , 2015, Cancer research.

[52]  C. Curtis,et al.  A Big Bang model of human colorectal tumor growth , 2015, Nature Genetics.