Integrating economic costs into the analysis of flexible conservation management strategies.

Flexible conservation management, where measures (e.g., mowing of meadows, removing invasive species) are selected in each decision period depending on the current state of the ecological system, is generally perceived as superior to fixed management, where the same measure is applied in each decision period independent of the current state of the system. In past comparisons of fixed and flexible conservation strategies the additional costs that arise only in flexible strategies have usually been ignored. In this paper, we present a framework to integrate costs of flexible management into the evaluation of flexible conservation strategies. Using the example of an endangered butterfly species we demonstrate that the costs of flexible management may reverse the rank order of flexible and fixed conservation strategies, such that fixed strategies may lead to better ecological results than flexible ones for the same financial budget.

[1]  Stefan Baumgärtner,et al.  Ecological‐Economic Modeling for Biodiversity Management: Potential, Pitfalls, and Prospects , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[2]  Richard T. Roush,et al.  ACTIVE ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT IN INSECT PEST AND WEED CONTROL: INTERVENTION WITH A PLAN FOR LEARNING , 2002 .

[3]  David Zilberman,et al.  Targeting Tools for the Purchase of Environmental Amenities , 1997 .

[4]  J. Settele,et al.  Less input same output: simplified approach for population size assessment in Lepidoptera , 2005, Population Ecology.

[5]  Martin Drechsler,et al.  A model-based approach for designing cost-effective compensation payments for conservation of endangered species in real landscapes , 2007 .

[6]  N. Goel,et al.  Stochastic models in biology , 1975 .

[7]  Ulrich Hampicke,et al.  Costs of land use for conservation in Central Europe and future agricultural policy , 2000 .

[8]  Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft,et al.  Why be wasteful when preserving a valuable resource? A review article on the cost-effectiveness of European biodiversity conservation policy , 2004 .

[9]  Martin Drechsler,et al.  Trade-offs between local and regional scale management of metapopulations , 1998 .

[10]  P. Clough.  Encouraging Private Biodiversity - Incentives for Biodiversity Conservation on Private Land , 2000 .

[11]  Hugh P Possingham,et al.  Should managed populations be monitored every year? , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[12]  Amy W. Ando,et al.  Species distributions, land values, and efficient conservation , 1998, Science.

[13]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  A theory for optimal monitoring of marine reserves , 2005 .

[14]  Josef Settele,et al.  Evolutionary biology: Butterfly mimics of ants , 2004, Nature.

[15]  Nils Chr. Stenseth,et al.  MANAGEMENT OF CHAMOIS (RUPICAPRA RUPICAPRA) MOVING BETWEEN A PROTECTED CORE AREA AND A HUNTING AREA , 2002 .

[16]  David Kleijn,et al.  Agri-environment schemes do not effectively protect biodiversity in Dutch agricultural landscapes , 2001, Nature.

[17]  K. Arrow,et al.  Environmental Preservation, Uncertainty, and Irreversibility , 1974 .

[18]  Frank Lad,et al.  Flexibility, learning, and irreversibility in environmental decisions: a Bayesian approach , 1984 .

[19]  A. O. Nicholls,et al.  Selecting networks of reserves to maximise biological diversity , 1988 .

[20]  Martin Drechsler,et al.  Influence of mowing on the persistence of two endangered large blue butterfly species , 2006 .

[21]  H. P. Possingham,et al.  State-Dependent Decision Analysis for Conservation Biology , 1997 .

[22]  Stephen Polasky,et al.  Takings, Compensation and Endangered Species Protection on Private Lands , 1998 .

[23]  Christian Wissel,et al.  Extinction of populations by random influences , 1991 .

[24]  Régis Sabbadin,et al.  Dynamic reserve site selection under contagion risk of deforestation , 2007 .

[25]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Improving the efficiency of wildlife monitoring by estimating detectability: a case study of foxes (Vulpes vulpes) on the Eyre Peninsula, South Australia , 2005 .

[26]  N. Hanley,et al.  Principles for the Provision of Public Goods from Agriculture: Modeling Moorland Conservation in Scotland , 1998 .

[27]  J. Thomas.  The behaviour and habitat requirements of Maculinea nausithous (the dusky large blue butterfly) and M. teleius (the scarce large blue) in France , 1984 .

[28]  Frank Wätzold,et al.  Spatially Uniform versus Spatially Heterogeneous Compensation Payments for Biodiversity-Enhancing Land-Use Measures , 2005 .

[29]  H. Wittmer,et al.  On the ‘Efficient Boundaries of the State’: The Contribution of Transaction-Costs Economics to the Analysis of Decentralization and Devolution in Natural Resource Management , 2004 .

[30]  Christian Wissel,et al.  The intrinsic mean time to extinction: a unifying approach to analysing persistence and viability of populations , 2004 .

[31]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  OPTIMAL FIRE MANAGEMENT FOR MAINTAINING COMMUNITY DIVERSITY , 1999 .

[32]  J. Shogren,et al.  Voluntary Incentive Design for Endangered Species Protection , 2002 .

[33]  Frank Wätzold,et al.  A decision model for the efficient management of a conservation fund over time , 2004 .

[34]  Colin W. Clark,et al.  Mathematical Bio-Economics: The Optimal Management of Renewable Resources , 1977 .

[35]  G. Wilson.  Factors Influencing Farmer Participation in the Environmentally Sensitive Areas Scheme , 1997 .

[36]  Wayne M. Getz,et al.  The use of stochastic dynamic programming in optimal landscape reconstruction for metapopulations , 2003 .

[37]  Eduardo S. Schwartz,et al.  Investment Under Uncertainty. , 1994 .