Interaural level differences and the level-meter model.

The interaural level difference (ILD) plays a significant role in sound localization. However, the definition of ILD for noise is open to some interpretation because it is not obvious how to deal with the inevitable level fluctuations. In this article, the ILD is interpreted as an energylike (time-integrated) measure of stimulus level, independent of other stimulus details-particularly interaural correlation. This concept is called the "level-meter model." The model was tested by measuring human ILD thresholds for noise stimuli that were interaurally correlated, or anticorrelated, or uncorrelated. An additional test (not involving lateralization) measured the threshold for level discrimination based on loudness. According to the level-meter model, all four thresholds should be the same. The experimental results showed that the predictions of the level-meter model held good to within about half a dB, although thresholds for level discrimination were systematically higher than ILDs. Among the ILDs themselves, thresholds were slightly higher for uncorrelated noise. The latter result could be explained by replacing the level-meter model with a loudness-meter model, incorporating temporal integration. The same model accounted for the bandwidth dependence of the threshold.

[1]  William A. Yost Lateral position of sinusoids presented with interaural intensive and temporal differences , 1981 .

[2]  D. M. Green,et al.  Auditory Detection of a Noise Signal , 1960 .

[3]  O. J. Dunn Multiple Comparisons among Means , 1961 .

[4]  S Buus Level discrimination of frozen and random noise. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  E. de Boer,et al.  Intensity Discrimination of Fluctuating Signals , 1966 .

[6]  W. Jesteadt,et al.  Comparison of monaural and binaural discrimination of intensity and frequency. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  G. Henning Detectability of interaural delay in high-frequency complex waveforms. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Brian R Glasberg,et al.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data , 1990, Hearing Research.

[9]  Masakazu Konishi,et al.  Effects of Interaural Decorrelation on Neural and Behavioral Detection of Spatial Cues , 1998, Neuron.

[10]  Harvey b. Fletcher,et al.  Speech and hearing in communication , 1953 .

[11]  D. Raab,et al.  Auditory intensity discrimination with bursts of reproducible noise. , 1975, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[13]  Roian S. Egnor Effects of binaural decorrelation on neural and behavioral processing of interaural level differences in the barn owl (Tyto alba) , 2001, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[14]  Arthur H. Benade,et al.  Two‐ear correlation in the statistical sound fields of rooms , 1986 .

[15]  Brian C. J. Moore,et al.  Chapter 5 – Frequency Analysis and Masking , 1995 .

[16]  T. Yin,et al.  The Coding of Spatial Location by Single Units in the Lateral Superior Olive of the Cat. I. Spatial Receptive Fields in Azimuth , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  S. van de Par,et al.  The normalized interaural correlation: accounting for NoS pi thresholds obtained with Gaussian and "low-noise" masking noise. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  H. Olson The Measurement of Loudness , 1972 .

[19]  M. A. Bouman,et al.  Relation between Hearing Threshold and Duration for Tone Pulses , 1959 .