Potential effects of anthropogenic noise on echolocation behavior in horseshoe bats

We previously reported that band-pass filtered noise (BFN, bandwidth 20 kHz) affected the echolocation behavior of horseshoe bats in different ways depending on which frequencies within the bats’ hearing range BFN was centered. We found that call amplitudes only increased when BFN was centered on the dominant frequency of the bats' calls. In contrast, call frequencies were shifted for all BFN stimuli centered on or below the dominant frequency of echolocation calls including when BFN was centered at 20 kHz (BFN20), which is far below the range of the bats’ echolocation call frequencies. In the present study we focused on masking effects of BFN20 and used it as a model stimulus for anthropogenic noise to investigate how this noise affected call parameters of echolocation calls, such as their frequency, amplitude, duration and rate. We show that only call frequencies shifted in response to masking BFN20, whereas all other call parameters tested exhibited no noise-related changes. Our findings provide an empirical basis to quantitatively predict the impact of anthropogenic noise on echolocation behavior in bats. They also emphasize the need for a better understanding of the impact of anthropogenic noise on bioacoustic communication and orientation systems in general.

[1]  Robert J Dooling,et al.  The effect of altered auditory feedback on control of vocal production in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus). , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  H. Schnitzler,et al.  Die Ultraschall-Ortungslaute der Hufeisen-Fledermäuse (Chiroptera-Rhinolophidae) in verschiedenen Orientierungssituationen , 1968, Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie.

[3]  H. Schnitzler,et al.  Auditory fovea and Doppler shift compensation: adaptations for flutter detection in echolocating bats using CF-FM signals , 2011, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[4]  H. Brumm,et al.  Bird song and anthropogenic noise: vocal constraints may explain why birds sing higher-frequency songs in cities , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  Joachim Ostwald,et al.  Foraging bats avoid noise , 2008, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[6]  J. A. Simmons,et al.  Peripheral auditory tuning for fine frequency analysis by the CF-FM bat,Rhinolophus ferrumequinum , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[7]  H. Brumm The impact of environmental noise on song amplitude in a territorial bird , 2004 .

[8]  Joseph M. Szewczak,et al.  Ultrasound emissions from wind turbines as a potential attractant to bats : a preliminary investigation , 2006 .

[9]  G. Pollak,et al.  Disproportionate frequency representation in the inferior colliculus of doppler-compensating Greater Horseshoe bats: Evidence for an acoustic fovea , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[10]  A. Horn,et al.  Ambient noise and the design of begging signals , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  Thierry Aubin,et al.  How do king penguins (Aptenodytes patagonicus apply the mathematical theory of information to communicate in windy conditions? , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  Sue Anne Zollinger,et al.  On the evolution of noise-dependent vocal plasticity in birds , 2012, Biology Letters.

[13]  O. Henson,et al.  Ultrasonic vocalizations of flying bats monitored by radiotelemetry. , 1992, The Journal of experimental biology.

[14]  Hiroshi Riquimaroux,et al.  FM echolocating bats shift frequencies to avoid broadcast–echo ambiguity in clutter , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  A power primer. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  L. M. Potash,et al.  Noise-induced changes in calls of the Japanese quail , 1972 .

[17]  D. Todt,et al.  Acoustic communication in noise: regulation of call characteristics in a New World monkey , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[18]  Jiang Feng,et al.  Ambient noise induces independent shifts in call frequency and amplitude within the Lombard effect in echolocating bats , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Dietmar Todt,et al.  Noise-dependent song amplitude regulation in a territorial songbird , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  N. Suga,et al.  Peripheral auditory tuning for fine frequency analysis by the CF-FM bat,Rhinolophus ferrumequinum , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[21]  R. Rübsamen,et al.  Foraging behaviour and echolocation in the rufous horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus rouxi) of Sri Lanka , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[22]  Hansjoerg P. Kunc,et al.  Experimentally increased noise levels change spatial and singing behaviour , 2013, Biology Letters.

[23]  B. Siemers,et al.  Hunting at the highway: traffic noise reduces foraging efficiency in acoustic predators , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  H. Slabbekoorn,et al.  Cities Change the Songs of Birds , 2006, Current Biology.

[25]  D B Moody,et al.  Regulation of voice amplitude by the monkey. , 1975, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  N Suga,et al.  Functional properties of auditory neurones in the cortex of echo‐locating bats. , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[27]  H. Slabbekoorn,et al.  Fluid dynamics: Vortex rings in a constant electric field , 2003, Nature.

[28]  H. Schnitzler,et al.  Die Ultraschallortungslaute der Hufeisen-Fledermause (Chiroptera-Rhinolophidae) in vershiedenen Orientierungssituationen , 1968 .

[29]  Kazuo Okanoya,et al.  Context-dependent song amplitude control in Bengalese finches , 2003, Neuroreport.