Early Design Stage Building LCA using the LCAbyg tool: Comparing Cases for Early Stage and Detailed LCA Approaches

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is used and accepted as a method to assess environmental impacts and resource use of buildings. In practice, LCA is typically used in stages where the design of the building is already finalized. However, LCA-calculations from early design stages can be used actively in design and optimization of the building. One of the obstacles to early stage LCA is that extensive data input on precise material types and amounts is needed, which is limited in early design stages. The simplifications needed for a designer in an early design LCA is addressed in a research project, where an extensive library of predefined building components and installations were developed and integrated into the existing Danish LCAbyg tool. The library assists the user in establishing a full building inventory by simple inputs of geometry of the building and a selection from the library of building element layers. However, the simplified approach to LCA of a building at early design stages inevitably affects results compared with results of a calculation made at later design stages where more, specific data is available. This paper presents an evaluation of building cases, modelled with the same background database and life cycle stages, using the simplified early design LCA approach and a detailed LCA approach. The evaluation includes testing of how well the predefined components in the early design approach fit with the case buildings and comparisons of the total material input and precision of the final LCA results.

[1]  Griet Verbeeck,et al.  Requirements for applying LCA-based environmental impact assessment tools in the early stages of building design , 2018 .

[2]  Rob Marsh,et al.  LCA profiles for building components: strategies for the early design process , 2016 .

[3]  Marzia Traverso,et al.  Level(s) – A common EU framework of core sustainability indicators for office and residential buildings (Part 1 and 2) , 2017 .

[4]  Johan Braet,et al.  Life cycle assessment in the construction sector: A review , 2013 .

[5]  Harpa Birgisdottir,et al.  Early Design Stage Building LCA using The LCAbyg Tool: New Strategies For Bridging The Data Gap , 2019, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science.

[6]  Rob Marsh,et al.  Embodied Carbon Tools for Architects and Clients Early in the Design Process , 2018 .

[7]  Erik Brandt,et al.  Levetider af bygningsdele ved vurdering af bæredygtighed og totaløkonomi , 2013 .

[8]  Viola John Derivation of reliable simplification strategies for the comparative LCA of individual and "typical" newly built Swiss apartment buildings , 2012 .

[9]  Francesco Pomponi,et al.  Measuring embodied carbon dioxide equivalent of buildings: A review and critique of current industry practice , 2017 .

[10]  Sébastien Lasvaux,et al.  EeBGuide Guidance Document Part B: Buildings. Operational guidance for life cycle assessment studies of the Energy Efficient Building Initiative , 2015 .

[11]  Harpa Birgisdottir,et al.  Development of LCAbyg: A National Life Cycle Assessment Tool for Buildings in Denmark , 2019, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science.