Divisability of Diltiazem Matrix Sustained-Release Tablets

The objective of this work was to study the possibility of a solid sustained-release dosage form, like a tablet, be divided without changing its release characteristics. Diltiazem hydrochloride Sustained-Release (SR) tablets with a standard groove on one face, were tested and the following dissolution parameters were evaluated: t10%, t25%, and t50% dissolution time, and dissolution efficiency at t120, and at t360. To analyze the release mechanism, several release models were tested such as Higuchi, zero order, first order, Baker-Lonsdale, Hixson-Crowell, Weibull, and Korsmeyer-Peppas. The similarities between two in vitro dissolution profiles were assessed by the difference factor (f1), the similarity factor (f2) and the Rescigno index (ξi). The in vitro release kinetics of diltiazem hydrochloride tablets were evaluated using USP apparatus 4. Using a one-way ANOVA (α = 0.05), statistically significant differences were found for t10%, t25%, and t50% dissolution times with a constant and with a variable pH dissolution fluid. The variation coefficient for the divisibility assay (Portuguese Pharmacopoeia VI) was lower than the limit value of 10%. The diltiazem release rate from this pharmaceutical system was not constant, and diminished with the square root of time (Higuchi model) showing that the phenomenon controlling drug release was the diffusion occurring inside the swelled polymeric matrix. Diltiazem release rate was a function of the area in direct contact with the dissolution fluid and not of the pharmaceutical matrix volume. The results obtained permit us to conclude that the division, in this case, affects the drug release characteristics.

[1]  Lewis J. Leeson,et al.  Some Observations on 'Rethinking the Use of Water as a Dissolution Medium' , 2000 .

[2]  V. Shah,et al.  Rethinking the Use of Water as a Dissolution Medium , 1999 .

[3]  R. Panchagnula,et al.  Drug release evaluation of diltiazem CR preparations , 1998 .

[4]  S. Chow,et al.  Statistical Evaluation of Similarity Factor f_2 as a Criterion for Assessment of Similarity Between Dissolution Profiles , 1997 .

[5]  H. L. Ju,et al.  On the Assessment of Similarity of Drug Dissolution Profiles—A Simulation Study , 1997 .

[6]  J. Polli,et al.  Methods to compare dissolution profiles and a rationale for wide dissolution specifications for metoprolol tartrate tablets. , 1997, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[7]  S. Chow,et al.  Statistical Issues on the FDA Conjugated Estrogen Tablets Bioequivalence Guidance , 1996 .

[8]  T. Mandal,et al.  Effect of tablet integrity on the dissolution rate of sustained‐release preparations , 1996, Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics.

[9]  J. W. Moore,et al.  Mathematical comparison of dissolution profiles , 1996 .

[10]  J. Rogers,et al.  Dissolution of fludrocortisone from phospholipid coprecipitates. , 1992, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[11]  D. Chulia,et al.  Statistical Optimization of a Controlled Release Formulation Obtained by a Double Compression Process: Application of an Hadamard Matrix and a Factorial Design , 1989 .

[12]  Joseph P. Remington,et al.  Remington's pharmaceutical sciences , 2016 .

[13]  N. Peppas Analysis of Fickian and non-Fickian drug release from polymers. , 1985, Pharmaceutica acta Helvetiae.

[14]  N. Peppas,et al.  Mechanisms of solute release from porous hydrophilic polymers , 1983 .

[15]  K J Simons,et al.  Dissolution and bioavailability studies of whole and halved sustained-release theophylline tablets. , 1982, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[16]  J. A. Goldsmith,et al.  On methods of expressing dissolution rate data , 1978, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.

[17]  K. A. Khan The concept of dissolution efficiency , 1975, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.

[18]  G. C. Walker,et al.  Influence of shape factors on kinetics of drug release from matrix tablets. II. Experimental. , 1974, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[19]  F Langenbucher,et al.  Letters to the Editor: Linearization of dissolution rate curves by the Weibull distribution , 1972, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.

[20]  K. A. Khan,et al.  Effect of compaction pressure on the dissolution efficiency of some direct compression systems. , 1972, Pharmaceutica acta Helvetiae.

[21]  J. Wagner Interpretation of percent dissolved-time plots derived from in vitro testing of conventional tablets and capsules. , 1969, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[22]  M Gibaldi,et al.  Establishment of sink conditions in dissolution rate determinations. Theoretical considerations and application to nondisintegrating dosage forms. , 1967, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[23]  T. Higuchi MECHANISM OF SUSTAINED-ACTION MEDICATION. THEORETICAL ANALYSIS OF RATE OF RELEASE OF SOLID DRUGS DISPERSED IN SOLID MATRICES. , 1963, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[24]  T. Higuchi,et al.  Rate of release of medicaments from ointment bases containing drugs in suspension. , 1961, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[25]  A. W. Hixson,et al.  Dependence of Reaction Velocity upon surface and Agitation , 1931 .