Safety and effectiveness of SGM-101, a fluorescent antibody targeting carcinoembryonic antigen, for intraoperative detection of colorectal cancer: a dose-escalation pilot study.

BACKGROUND Tumour-targeted fluorescence imaging has the potential to advance current practice of oncological surgery by selectively highlighting malignant tissue during surgery. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is overexpressed in 90% of colorectal cancers and is a promising target for colorectal cancer imaging. We aimed to assess the tolerability of SGM-101, a fluorescent anti-CEA monoclonal antibody, and to investigate the feasibility to detect colorectal cancer with intraoperative fluorescence imaging. METHODS We did an open-label, pilot study in two medical centres in the Netherlands. In the dose-escalation cohort, we included patients (aged ≥18 years) with primary colorectal cancer with increased serum CEA concentrations (upper limit of normal of ≥3 ng/mL) since diagnosis, who were scheduled for open or laparoscopic tumour resection. In the expansion cohort, we included patients (aged ≥18 years) with recurrent or peritoneal metastases of colorectal cancer, with increasing serum concentrations of CEA since diagnosis, who were scheduled for open surgical resection. We did not mask patients, investigators, or anyone from the health-care team. We assigned patients using a 3 + 3 dose design to 5 mg, 7·5 mg, or 10 mg of SGM-101 in the dose-escalation cohort. In the expansion cohort, patients received a dose that was considered optimal at that moment of the study but not higher than the dose used in the dose-escalation cohort. SGM-101 was administered intravenously for 30 min to patients 2 or 4 days before surgery. Intraoperative imaging was done to identify near-infrared fluorescent lesions, which were resected and assessed for fluorescence. The primary outcome was tolerability and safety of SGM-101, assessed before administration and continued up to 12 h after dosing, on the day of surgery, the first postoperative day, and follow-up visits at the day of discharge and the first outpatient clinic visit. Secondary outcomes were effectiveness of SGM-101 for detection of colorectal cancer, assessed by tumour-to-background ratios (TBR); concordance between fluorescent signal and tumour status of resected tissue; and diagnostic accuracy in both cohorts. This trial is registered with the Nederlands Trial Register, number NTR5673, and ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02973672. FINDINGS Between January, 2016, and February, 2017, 26 patients (nine in the dose-escalation cohort and 17 in the expansion cohort) were included in this study. SGM-101 did not cause any treatment-related adverse events, although three possibly related mild adverse events were reported in three (33%) of nine patients in the dose-escalation cohort and five were reported in three (18%) of 17 patients in the expansion cohort. Five moderate adverse events were reported in three (18%) patients in the expansion cohort, but they were deemed unrelated to SGM-101. No changes in vital signs, electrocardiogram, or laboratory results were found after administration of the maximum dose of 10 mg of SGM-101 in both cohorts. A dose of 10 mg, administered 4 days before surgery, showed the highest TBR (mean TBR 6·10 [SD 0·42] in the dose-escalation cohort). In the expansion cohort, 19 (43%) of 43 lesions were detected using fluorescence imaging and were not clinically suspected before fluorescent detection, which changed the treatment strategy in six (35%) of 17 patients. Sensitivity was 98%, specificity was 62%, and accuracy of fluorescence intensity was 84% in the expansion cohort. INTERPRETATION This study presents the first clinical use of CEA-targeted detection of colorectal cancer and shows that SGM-101 is safe and can influence clinical decision making during the surgical procedure for patients with colorectal cancer. FUNDING Surgimab.

[1]  Alexander L Vahrmeijer,et al.  SGM-101: An innovative near-infrared dye-antibody conjugate that targets CEA for fluorescence-guided surgery. , 2017, Surgical oncology.

[2]  Phil Quirke,et al.  What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer? , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  P. Mulders,et al.  Detection of Micrometastases Using SPECT/Fluorescence Dual-Modality Imaging in a CEA-Expressing Tumor Model , 2017, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  A. L. Vahrmeijer,et al.  Characterization and Evaluation of the Artemis Camera for Fluorescence-Guided Cancer Surgery , 2014, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[5]  G. Beets,et al.  Absence of tumor invasion into pelvic structures in locally recurrent rectal cancer: prediction with preoperative MR imaging. , 2010, Radiology.

[6]  V. Lemmens,et al.  Trends in cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for the treatment of synchronous peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin in the Netherlands. , 2015, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[7]  Eben L. Rosenthal,et al.  Beyond the margins: real-time detection of cancer using targeted fluorophores , 2017, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[8]  Richard Emsley,et al.  Watch-and-wait approach versus surgical resection after chemoradiotherapy for patients with rectal cancer (the OnCoRe project): a propensity-score matched cohort analysis. , 2016, The Lancet. Oncology.

[9]  P. Low,et al.  Intraoperative tumor-specific fluorescence imaging in ovarian cancer by folate receptor-α targeting: first in-human results , 2011, Nature Medicine.

[10]  G. Gravante,et al.  Rectal cancers with microscopic circumferential resection margin involvement (R1 resections): Survivals, patterns of recurrence, and prognostic factors , 2016, Journal of surgical oncology.

[11]  John V. Frangioni,et al.  The Value of Intraoperative Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging Based on Enhanced Permeability and Retention of Indocyanine Green: Feasibility and False-Positives in Ovarian Cancer , 2015, PloS one.

[12]  Alexander L Vahrmeijer,et al.  Oncologic Procedures Amenable to Fluorescence-guided Surgery , 2017, Annals of surgery.

[13]  P. Kuppen,et al.  Selecting Targets for Tumor Imaging: An Overview of Cancer-Associated Membrane Proteins , 2016, Biomarkers in cancer.

[14]  Vasilis Ntziachristos,et al.  Tumor-Specific Uptake of Fluorescent Bevacizumab–IRDye800CW Microdosing in Patients with Primary Breast Cancer: A Phase I Feasibility Study , 2016, Clinical Cancer Research.

[15]  Joshua S Richman,et al.  Safety and Tumor Specificity of Cetuximab-IRDye800 for Surgical Navigation in Head and Neck Cancer , 2015, Clinical Cancer Research.

[16]  Melissa L. Korb,et al.  Characterizing the detection threshold for optical imaging in surgical oncology , 2017, Journal of surgical oncology.

[17]  H. Maeda,et al.  Tumor vascular permeability and the EPR effect in macromolecular therapeutics: a review. , 2000, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[18]  M. Fukayama,et al.  Prediction of Pathological Complete Response Using Endoscopic Findings and Outcomes of Patients Who Underwent Watchful Waiting After Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer , 2017, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[19]  H. Nelson,et al.  Results of a pooled analysis of IOERT containing multimodality treatment for locally recurrent rectal cancer: Results of 565 patients of two major treatment centres. , 2017, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[20]  A. Vahrmeijer,et al.  Correlation Between Preoperative Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels and Expression on Pancreatic and Rectal Cancer Tissue , 2017, Biomarkers in cancer.

[21]  D. Jayne,et al.  Carcinoembryonic antigen is the preferred biomarker for in vivo colorectal cancer targeting , 2013, British Journal of Cancer.

[22]  H. Maeda,et al.  A new concept for macromolecular therapeutics in cancer chemotherapy: mechanism of tumoritropic accumulation of proteins and the antitumor agent smancs. , 1986, Cancer research.

[23]  Banghe Zhu,et al.  A matter of collection and detection for intraoperative and noninvasive near-infrared fluorescence molecular imaging: to see or not to see? , 2014, Medical physics.

[24]  N. Harlaar,et al.  Molecular fluorescence-guided surgery of peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin: a single-centre feasibility study. , 2016, The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology.

[25]  D. Larsimont,et al.  Fluorescence Imaging After Indocyanine Green Injection for Detection of Peritoneal Metastases in Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis From Colorectal Cancer: A Pilot Study , 2016, Annals of surgery.

[26]  Lucia M. A. Crane,et al.  Selecting Potential Targetable Biomarkers for Imaging Purposes in Colorectal Cancer Using TArget Selection Criteria (TASC): A Novel Target Identification Tool. , 2011, Translational oncology.

[27]  Siavash Yazdanfar,et al.  Detection of colorectal polyps in humans using an intravenously administered fluorescent peptide targeted against c-Met , 2015, Nature Medicine.

[28]  D. Ryan,et al.  Cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic perioperative chemotherapy to treat peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer: standard of care or an experimental approach? , 2012, The Lancet. Oncology.

[29]  S. Hammarström The carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) family: structures, suggested functions and expression in normal and malignant tissues. , 1999, Seminars in cancer biology.

[30]  Christopher H Contag,et al.  Regulatory Aspects of Optical Methods and Exogenous Targets for Cancer Detection. , 2017, Cancer research.