Assessing the true role of coauthors in the h-index measure of an author scientific impact

A method based on the classical principal component analysis leads to demonstrate that the role of co-authors should give a h-index measure to a group leader higher than usually accepted. The method rather easily gives what is usually searched for, i.e. an estimate of the role (or “weight”) of co-authors, as the additional value to an author papers’ popularity. The construction of the co-authorship popularity H-matrix is exemplified and the role of eigenvalues and the main eigenvector component are discussed. Examples illustrate the points and serve as the basis for suggesting a generally practical application of the concept.

[1]  Vincenzo Carbone.  Fractional counting of authorship to quantify scientific research output , 2011, ArXiv.

[2]  Marcel Ausloos.  Binary scientific star coauthors core size , 2014, Scientometrics.

[3]  G. Laudel.  What do we measure by co-authorships? , 2002 .

[4]  L. S. Kwok,et al.  The White Bull effect: abusive coauthorship and publication parasitism , 2005, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[5]  Janusz Miskiewicz,et al.  Effects of Publications in Proceedings on the Measure of the Core Size of Coauthors , 2013, ArXiv.

[6]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Scientometric Indicators of Finnish and Hungarian Publication Performance and Citation Impact in Some Fields of Science (1976-1980) , 1985 .

[7]  Jorge E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output that takes into account the effect of multiple coauthorship , 2009, Scientometrics.

[8]  Hassan Bougrine,et al.  Subfield effects on the core of coauthors , 2013, Scientometrics.

[9]  Michael Schreiber,et al.  Twenty Hirsch index variants and other indicators giving more or less preference to highly cited papers , 2010, ArXiv.

[10]  Giovanni Abramo,et al.  The importance of accounting for the number of co-authors and their order when assessing research performance at the individual level in the life sciences , 2018, J. Informetrics.

[11]  Ç. Şekercioğlu.  Quantifying Coauthor Contributions , 2008, Science.

[12]  Chun-Ting Zhang,et al.  A proposal for calculating weighted citations based on author rank , 2009, EMBO reports.

[13]  Michael Schreiber,et al.  A modification of the h-index: The hm-index accounts for multi-authored manuscripts , 2008, J. Informetrics.

[14]  M. Rozing,et al.  Profit (p)-Index: The Degree to Which Authors Profit from Co-Authors , 2013, PloS one.

[15]  V. Durieux,et al.  Bibliometric indicators: quality measurements of scientific publication. , 2010, Radiology.

[16]  Weimao Ke,et al.  Studying the emerging global brain: Analyzing and visualizing the impact of co-authorship teams , 2005, Complex..

[17]  J. E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[18]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[19]  H. Stanley,et al.  Methods for measuring the citations and productivity of scientists across time and discipline. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[20]  A. Schubert,et al.  Scientometric Indicators: A 32-Century Comparative Evaluation of Publishing Performance and Citation Impact , 1985 .

[21]  Mônica G. Campiteli,et al.  Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? , 2006, Scientometrics.

[22]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields , 2009, J. Informetrics.

[23]  Judit Bar-Ilan,et al.  Which h-index? — A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar , 2008, Scientometrics.

[24]  M. Schreiber,et al.  Exploratory factor analysis for the Hirsch index, 17 h-type variants, and some traditional bibliometric indicators , 2012, J. Informetrics.

[25]  Steven A. Morris,et al.  Manifestation of research teams in journal literature: A growth model of papers, authors, collaboration, coauthorship, weak ties, and Lotka's law , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[26]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations , 2004, Scientometrics.

[27]  Leo Egghe,et al.  Mathematical theory of the h- and g-index in case of fractional counting of authorship , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[28]  Robert A. Buchanan,et al.  Accuracy of Cited References: The Role of Citation Databases , 2006 .

[29]  Michael Schreiber,et al.  Self-citation corrections for the Hirsch index , 2007 .

[30]  Michael Schreiber,et al.  How to modify the g-index for multi-authored manuscripts , 2010, J. Informetrics.

[31]  Serge Galam,et al.  Tailor based allocations for multiple authorship: a fractional gh-index , 2010, Scientometrics.

[32]  Giulia Rotundo,et al.  Black–Scholes–Schrödinger–Zipf–Mandelbrot model framework for improving a study of the coauthor core score , 2014 .

[33]  Yannis Manolopoulos,et al.  Generalized Hirsch h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks , 2007, Scientometrics.

[34]  Michael Schreiber,et al.  To share the fame in a fair way, hm modifies h for multi-authored manuscripts , 2008 .

[35]  N. T. Hagen,et al.  Credit for Coauthors , 2009, Science.

[36]  Olle Persson,et al.  Studying research collaboration using co-authorships , 1996, Scientometrics.

[37]  Jerome K. Vanclay,et al.  On the robustness of the h-index , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[38]  M. Ausloos,et al.  ANDRZEJ PȨKALSKI NETWORKS OF SCIENTIFIC INTERESTS WITH INTERNAL DEGREES OF FREEDOM THROUGH SELF-CITATION ANALYSIS , 2007, 0710.1800.

[39]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Coauthorship Patterns and Trends in the Sciences (1980-1998): A Bibliometric Study With Implications for Database Indexing and Search Strategies , 2002, Libr. Trends.

[40]  Steven A. Morris,et al.  Manifestation of emerging specialties in journal literature: A growth model of papers, references, exemplars, bibliographic coupling, cocitation, and clustering coefficient distribution , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[41]  Marcel Ausloos,et al.  A scientometrics law about co-authors and their ranking: the co-author core , 2012, Scientometrics.