Comparison of breast density measured on MR images acquired using fat-suppressed versus nonfat-suppressed sequences.

PURPOSE To investigate the difference of MR percent breast density measured from fat-suppressed versus nonfat-suppressed imaging sequences. METHODS Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with and without fat suppression was acquired from 38 subjects. Breasts were divided into subgroups of different morphological patterns ("central" and "intermingled" types). Breast volume, fibroglandular tissue volume, and percent density were measured. The results were compared using nonparametric statistical tests and regarded as significant at p < 0.05. RESULTS Breast volume, fibroglandular volume, and percent density between fat-suppressed and nonfat-suppressed sequences were highly correlated. Breast volumes measured on these two sequences were almost identical. Fibroglandular tissue volume and percent density, however, had small (<5%) yet significant differences between the two sequences-they were both higher on the fat-suppressed sequence. Intraobserver variability was within 4% for both sequences and different morphological types. The fibroglandular tissue volume measured on downsampled images showed a small (<5%) yet significant difference. CONCLUSIONS The measurement of breast density made on MRI acquired using fat-suppressed and nonfat-suppressed T1W images was about 5% difference, only slightly higher than the intraobserver variability of 3%-4%. When the density data from multiple centers were to be combined, evaluating the degree of difference is needed to take this difference into account.

[1]  A. Miller,et al.  Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[2]  H Rusinek,et al.  Fatty and fibroglandular tissue volumes in the breasts of women 20-83 years old: comparison of X-ray mammography and computer-assisted MR imaging. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  David Tritchler,et al.  Heritability of mammographic density, a risk factor for breast cancer. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Correlation between mammographic density and volumetric fibroglandular tissue estimated on breast MR images. , 2004, Medical physics.

[5]  Jennifer A Harvey,et al.  Quantitative assessment of mammographic breast density: relationship with breast cancer risk. , 2004, Radiology.

[6]  C. Klifa,et al.  Quantification of breast tissue index from MR data using fuzzy clustering , 2004, The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[7]  Jianhua Yao,et al.  Classification and calculation of breast fibroglandular tissue volume on SPGR fat suppressed MRI , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[8]  V. McCormack,et al.  Breast Density and Parenchymal Patterns as Markers of Breast Cancer Risk: A Meta-analysis , 2006, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[9]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Volumetric breast density estimation from full-field digital mammograms , 2006, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[10]  N. Boyd,et al.  Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  V Shane Pankratz,et al.  Longitudinal Trends in Mammographic Percent Density and Breast Cancer Risk , 2007, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[12]  S. Cummings,et al.  Critical assessment of new risk factors for breast cancer: considerations for development of an improved risk prediction model. , 2007, Endocrine-related cancer.

[13]  Jennifer A Harvey,et al.  Breast MR imaging artifacts: how to recognize and fix them. , 2007, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[14]  Sheila Prindiville,et al.  Effect of Raloxifene on Mammographic Density and Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Premenopausal Women at Increased Risk for Breast Cancer , 2008, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[15]  Michael Khazen,et al.  A Pilot Study of Compositional Analysis of the Breast and Estimation of Breast Mammographic Density Using Three-Dimensional T1-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2008, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[16]  Min-Ying Su,et al.  Development of a quantitative method for analysis of breast density based on three-dimensional breast MRI. , 2008, Medical physics.

[17]  C. Boetes,et al.  Breast MRI: guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging , 2008, European Radiology.

[18]  Michael Khazen,et al.  Assessing the usefulness of a novel MRI-based breast density estimation algorithm in a cohort of women at high genetic risk of breast cancer: the UK MARIBS study , 2009, Breast Cancer Research.

[19]  O. Nalcioglu,et al.  Decrease in breast density in the contralateral normal breast of patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy: MR imaging evaluation. , 2010, Radiology.

[20]  O. Nalcioglu,et al.  Age- and race-dependence of the fibroglandular breast density analyzed on 3D MRI. , 2010, Medical physics.

[21]  Catherine Klifa,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging for secondary assessment of breast density in a high-risk cohort. , 2010, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[22]  Min-Ying Su,et al.  Impact of skin removal on quantitative measurement of breast density using MRI. , 2010, Medical physics.

[23]  S. Singer,et al.  Fat‐free MRI based on magnetization exchange , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  Min-Ying Su,et al.  Quantitative analysis of breast parenchymal patterns using 3D fibroglandular tissues segmented based on MRI. , 2009, Medical physics.

[25]  R. Chang,et al.  Reduction of breast density following tamoxifen treatment evaluated by 3-D MRI: preliminary study. , 2011, Magnetic resonance imaging.