Experiments and Calculations Relevant to Aerodynamic Effects during Highway Passing Maneuvers

Aerodynamic effects during highway passing maneuvers are still not well documented. To better understand these effects, a 40% car-truck overtaking process has been carried out in the BMW wind tunnel. As a first step, the car aerodynamics has been measured without the truck to establish the reference pressure distribution for subsequent tests. The overtaking process has been approximated by fixing the truck model at eight stationary positions relative to the car model. This approximates the overtaking process as a quasi-stationary process. The reference calculations are performed with a new variant of ¯v2- f model, the so-called ζ-f model (Hanjalic et al., 2004). Furthermore, the calculations are also performed by using recently proposed Partially-averaged Navier Stokes (PANS) model (Girimaji et al., 2003, Girimaji and Hamid, 2005) in order to capture unsteady effects more correctly compared with the unsteady RANS. Because of its extensive reference database, the well-known Ahmed body benchmark (25 degrees) was computationally investigated as an introductory case with respect to the comparative assessment of the RANS and PANS approaches. A validation procedure for the PANS method is then conducted by computing the single passenger car (40% BMW model).

[1]  Sharath S. Girimaji,et al.  PANS Turbulence Model for Seamless Transition Between RANS and LES: Fixed-Point Analysis and Preliminary Results , 2003 .

[2]  T. Gatski,et al.  Modelling the pressure–strain correlation of turbulence: an invariant dynamical systems approach , 1991, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[3]  Sunil Lakshmipathy,et al.  Partially-averaged Navier-Stokes method for turbulent flows: k-w model implementation , 2006 .

[4]  M. Hadžiabdić,et al.  A robust near-wall elliptic-relaxation eddy-viscosity turbulence model for CFD , 2004 .

[5]  P. Durbin Near-wall turbulence closure modeling without “damping functions” , 1991, Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics.

[6]  B. Basara,et al.  On the Calculation of External Aerodynamics: Industrial Benchmarks , 2001 .

[7]  S. Girimaji,et al.  Partially-averaged Navier Stokes Model for Turbulence: Implementation and Validation , 2005 .

[8]  Sung-Eun Kim,et al.  Advances in External-Aero Simulation of Ground Vehicles Using the Steady RANS Equations , 2000 .

[9]  Stefan Becker,et al.  Flow and Turbulence Structure in the Wake of a Simplified Car Model , 2003 .

[10]  Thomas B. Gatski,et al.  rP % ICASE Report No . 905 N I < ICASE MODELING THE PRESSURE-STRAIN CORRELATION OF TURBULENCE-AN INVARIANT DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS APPROACH , 2022 .

[11]  K. Hanjalic,et al.  Compound Wall Treatment for RANS Computation of Complex Turbulent Flows and Heat Transfer , 2007 .

[12]  B. Basara,et al.  Time Dependent vs. Steady State Calculations of External Aerodynamics , 2004 .

[13]  Branislav Basara,et al.  Experimental investigations and computations of unsteady flow past a real car using a robust elliptic relaxation closure with a universal wall treatment , 2007 .

[14]  Parviz Moin,et al.  Experimental and computational study of unsteady wake flow behind a bluff body with a drag reduction device , 2001 .

[15]  Branislav Basara,et al.  Eddy viscosity transport model based on elliptic relaxation approach , 2006 .