The Role of Pre-Entry Experience, Entry Timing and Product Technology Strategies in Explaining Firm Survival

Studying the U.S. personal computer industry from its inception in 1974 through 1994, we address the following questions. What product technology strategies increase the survival chances of entrants into new, technologically dynamic industries? Does the effectiveness of these strategies differ by pre-entry experience? Does the effectiveness of these strategies differ by when firms enter a new industry? Consistent with the published literature, we find that diversifying entrants have an initial survival advantage over entrepreneurial startups. But, we find the reverse for later entrants: startups that enter later in the industry have a survival advantage over the later entering diversifying entrants. We explain this finding in terms of the firms' product technology strategies (i.e., offering products based on the technology standard and products incorporating the latest technology), pre-entry experience, and entry timing. Our findings highlight that it is crucial to study what firms do after they enter a new industry to more completely understand their ultimate performance.

[1]  S. Klepper.  Entry, Exit, Growth, and Innovation over the Product Life Cycle , 1996 .

[2]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Strategies for Survival in Fast-Changing Industries , 1998 .

[3]  M. Sarkar,et al.  The conditioning effect of time on firm survival: An industry life cycle approach , 2002 .

[4]  Linsu Kim,et al.  Invasion of a Stable Business by Radical Innovation , 1985 .

[5]  Nalin Kulatilaka,et al.  Options Thinking and Platform Investments: Investing in Opportunity , 1994 .

[6]  Neil Jones,et al.  Competing after radical technological change: the significance of product line management strategy , 2003 .

[7]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments , 1986 .

[8]  Clayton M. Christensen.  The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail , 2013 .

[9]  J. Stavins.  Model Entry and Exit in a Differentiated-Product Industry: The Personal Computer Market , 1995 .

[10]  Mary Tripsas.  UNRAVELING THE PROCESS OF CREATIVE DESTRUCTION: COMPLEMENTARY ASSETS AND INCUMBENT SURVIVAL IN THE TYPESETTER INDUSTRY: UNRAVELING THE PROCESS OF CREATIVE DESTRUCTION , 1997 .

[11]  J. Stavins.  Estimating demand elasticities in a differentiated product industry : the personal computer market , 1997 .

[12]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[13]  J. Macieira.  Extending the Frontier: A Structural Model of Investment and Technological Competition in the Supercomputer Industry , 2007 .

[14]  S. Klepper,et al.  Time Paths in the Diffusion of Product Innovations , 1982 .

[15]  Joseph F. Porac,et al.  Are more resources always better for growth? Resource stickiness in market and product expansion , 2004 .

[16]  M. Porter,et al.  From Entry Barriers to Mobility Barriers: Conjectural Decisions and Contrived Deterrence to New Competition , 1977 .

[17]  Kathryn Graziano.  The innovator's dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail , 1998 .

[18]  Glenn R. Carroll,et al.  Organizations in industry : strategy, structure, and selection , 1995 .

[19]  Steven Klepper,et al.  Dominance by birthright: entry of prior radio producers and competitive ramifications in the U. S. , 2000 .

[20]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  The External Control of Organizations. , 1978 .

[21]  William Q. Judge,et al.  The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, by Edith T. Penrose. Oxford: Blackwell, 1959 (Book Review) , 2008 .

[22]  John Steffens,et al.  Newgames: Strategic Competition in the PC Revolution , 1993 .

[23]  Anand Swaminathan,et al.  Racing and Back-Pedalling into the Future: New Product Introduction and Organizational Mortality in the US Bicycle Industry, 1880-1918 , 2000 .

[24]  Suresh Kotha,et al.  Dominant Designs and Population Dynamics in Telecommunications Services: Founding and Failure of Facsimile Transmission Service Organizations, 1965-1992 , 1995 .

[25]  D. B. Montgomery,et al.  First-mover (dis)advantages: Retrospective and link with the resource-based view , 1998 .

[26]  M. Porter.  How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy , 1989 .

[27]  Ernst R. Berndt,et al.  Price and Quality of Desktop and Mobile Personal Computers: A Quarter-Century Historical Overview , 2001 .

[28]  Boyan Jovanovic,et al.  Learning By Doing and the Choice of Technology , 1994 .

[29]  Rupert G. Miller,et al.  Survival Analysis , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[30]  Igor H.Ansoff.  Strategic Management , 1979 .

[31]  Barrie R. Nault,et al.  Eating Your Own Lunch: Protection through Preemption , 1995 .

[32]  Ariel Pakes,et al.  A Framework for Applied Dynamic Analysis in I.O , 2000 .

[33]  James B. Wade.  Dynamics of organizational communities and technological bandwagons: An empirical investigation of community evolution in the microprocessor market , 1995 .

[34]  Jeremy Fairbank,et al.  Historical Perspective , 1987, Blood Traces.

[35]  Barry L. Bayus,et al.  The Market Evolution and Take-Off of Product Innovations , 2002 .

[36]  Robert A. Burgelman.  Fading Memories: A Process Theory of Strategic Business Exit in Dynamic Environments , 1994 .

[37]  Lowell W. Busenitz,et al.  Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making , 1997 .

[38]  Melissa A. Schilling.  Technological Lockout: An Integrative Model of the Economic and Strategic Factors Driving Technology Success and Failure , 1998 .

[39]  Peter E. Rossi,et al.  Structural Modeling in Marketing: Review and Assessment , 2004 .

[40]  D. North.  Competing Technologies , Increasing Returns , and Lock-In by Historical Events , 1994 .

[41]  M. Hannan,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .

[42]  J. March,et al.  Handbook of organizations , 1966 .

[43]  M. Mcgrath.  Product Strategy for High Technology Companies , 2000 .

[44]  H. Rao,et al.  The Demography of Corporations and Industries , 1999 .

[45]  Robert E. Clark,et al.  Going ... Going ... Gone , 1978 .

[46]  O. Sorenson.  Letting the market work for you: an evolutionary perspective on product strategy , 2000 .

[47]  Glenn R. Carroll,et al.  The fates of De Novo and De Alio producers in the American Automobile Industry 1885–1981 , 2007 .

[48]  J. R. Moore,et al.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[49]  R. Chandy,et al.  Organizing for Radical Product Innovation: The Overlooked Role of Willingness to Cannibalize , 1998 .

[50]  Garrett van Ryzin,et al.  An Analysis of Product Lifetimes in a Technologically Dynamic Industry , 1998 .

[51]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  Market Segmentation and the Sources of Rents from Innovation: Personal Computers in the Late 1980&Apos;S , 1996 .

[52]  ChintaguntaPradeep,et al.  Structural Modeling in Marketing , 2006 .

[53]  Andrew D. Henderson,et al.  Within‐business diversification in technology‐intensive industries , 2004 .

[54]  T. Bresnahan,et al.  Market Segmentation and the Sources of Rents from Innovation: Personal Computers in the Late 1980s , 1997 .

[55]  Donald E. Hatfield,et al.  The Value of Patience and Start-up Firms: A Re-Examination of Entry Timing for Emerging Markets , 2000 .

[56]  Richard E. Caves,et al.  In praise of the Old I.O. , 2007 .

[57]  Christopher L. Tucci,et al.  Incumbent Entry into New Market Niches: The Role of Experience and Managerial Choice in the Creation of Dynamic Capabilities , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[58]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation , 1996 .

[59]  A. Swaminathan.  The proliferation of specialist organizations in the American wine industry, 1941-1990 , 1995 .

[60]  H. Landis Gabel,et al.  Competitive strategies for product standards : the strategic use of compatibility standards for competitive advantage , 1991 .

[61]  James Curry,et al.  Beating the Clocks: Corporate Responses to Rapid Change in the PC Industry , 1999 .

[62]  April Franco,et al.  KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER THROUGH INHERITANCE: SPIN- OUT GENERATION, DEVELOPMENT, AND SURVIVAL , 2004 .

[63]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  The birth of capabilities: market entry and the importance of pre-history , 2002 .

[64]  A. Pakes,et al.  Markov-Perfect Industry Dynamics: A Framework for Empirical Work , 1995 .

[65]  M. Pagano,et al.  Survival analysis. , 1996, Nutrition.

[66]  Michael R. Lavin.  Business information: How to find it, how to use it , 1987 .

[67]  K. Clark,et al.  Integration and Dynamic Capability: Evidence from Product Development in Automobiles and Mainframe Computers , 1994 .

[68]  Steven Klepper,et al.  Firm Survival and the Evolution of Oligopoly , 2002 .

[69]  Barry L. Bayus,et al.  The Market Evolution and Sales Takeoff of Product Innovations , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[70]  A. Stinchcombe.  Social Structure and Organizations , 2000, Political Organizations.