Increasing Compliance with a Request: Two Touches are More Effective than One

Touch procedures have been shown to increase the likelihood of compliance with requests. But the effect of subsequent touches following a classical touch procedure has not been investigated. It was predicted that two touches would lead to more compliance than one touch. 180 male and 180 female bystanders were asked to fill in a short or long questionnaire by a female confederate. They were touched by the confederate either once, twice, or not at all. Results showed that there was more compliance in the two-touch than in the one-touch condition, and when the participants were touched by the confederate. These findings support the hypothesis. Moreover, whereas participants were less likely to fill in the long questionnaire in the no-touch condition, touch procedures led to more compliance whatever the questionnaire length. Also, touch was more effective when a female confederate made the request to a male participant.

[1]  Nicolas Guéguen,et al.  Touch, Compliance, and Awareness of Tactile Contact , 2007, Perceptual and motor skills.

[2]  C. H. Hansen,et al.  Post-compliance touch: an incentive for task performance. , 1994, The Journal of social psychology.

[3]  R. Heslin,et al.  Hands touching hands: affective and evaluative effects of an interpersonal touch. , 1976, Sociometry.

[4]  T. Jones,et al.  Interpersonal distance, body orientation, and touch: effects of culture, gender, and age. , 1995, The Journal of social psychology.

[5]  Nicolas Guéguen,et al.  Another Evaluation of Touch and Helping Behavior , 2003, Psychological reports.

[6]  Bryan L Hendricks,et al.  Effects of Interpersonal Touch, Degree of Justification, and Sex of Participant on Compliance With a Request , 1997 .

[7]  R. Cialdini,et al.  Reciprocal Concessions Procedure for Inducing Compliance: The Door-in-the-Face Technique , 1975 .

[8]  M. Goldman,et al.  The Effect of Touching Different Body Areas on Prosocial Behavior , 1984 .

[9]  J. Hornik,et al.  The effect of touch and gaze upon compliance and interest of interviewees , 1987 .

[10]  Deborah A. Prentice,et al.  Contrast tests of interaction hypothesis. , 1997 .

[11]  J. Freedman,et al.  Compliance without pressure: the foot-in-the-door technique. , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  N. Guéguen.  Toucher et soumission à une requête : réplications expérimentales en situation naturelle et évaluation de l'impact du statut , 2001 .

[13]  D. Howard.  The Effects of Touch in the Geriatric Population , 2022, Rehabilitation Interventions for the Institutionalized Elderly.

[14]  M. Goldman,et al.  Interpersonal Touch, Social Labeling, and the Foot-in-the-Door Effect , 1985 .

[15]  M. Goldman,et al.  Prosocial behavior as affected by eye contact, touch, and voice expression. , 1983, The Journal of social psychology.

[16]  C. Kleinke,et al.  Compliance to requests made by gazing and touching experimenters in field settings. , 1977 .

[17]  Robert P. Abelson,et al.  Contrast Tests of Interaction Hypotheses , 2001 .