Edith Penrose and the resource-based view of (international) business strategy

In recent years, there has been substantial interest in the work of Edith Penrose, particularly her contribution to the resource-based theory of (international) business strategy. The aim of this paper is to critically assess some recent literature, focusing, for illustrative purposes, on an article by Rugman and Verbeke (R-V). R-V's article claims that Penrose's focus was on value creation, not rents in equilibrium (the focus of the resource-based view). It also observes that the work by Penrose on the multinational enterprise did focus on value appropriation and rents, but this work was somewhat at odds with Penrose's work on the domestic firm. We claim that while Penrose's work was concerned primarily with value creation, she dealt explicitly with monopoly rents too. Her work on the multinational firm was in line with her analysis of the domestic firm. Moreover, her work has important prescriptive lessons for management practice.

[1]  D. Teece ECONOMIES OF SCOPE AND THE SCOPE OF THE ENTERPRISE , 1980 .

[2]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[3]  Robin Marris Edith Penrose and Economics , 1999 .

[4]  Joseph T. Mahoney,et al.  Edith Penrose's (1959) Contributions to the Resource‐based View of Strategic Management , 2004 .

[5]  E. Penrose,et al.  Foreign Investment and the Growth of the Firm , 1956 .

[6]  Allyn A. Young,et al.  INCREASING RETURNS AND ECONOMIC PROGRESS , 1928 .

[7]  J. Dunning The Eclectic Paradigm of International Production: A Restatement and Some Possible Extensions , 1988 .

[8]  A. Rugman,et al.  NEW THEORIES OF THE MULTXNATIONAL ENTERPRISE: AN ASSESSMENT OF INTERNALIZATION THEORY , 1986 .

[9]  J. Schumpeter Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[10]  H. Demsetz The Theory of the Firm Revisited , 1988 .

[11]  R. Marris,et al.  The economic theory of "managerial" capitalism , 1964 .

[12]  J. Bain Barriers to new competition , 1957 .

[13]  R. Coase The Nature of the Firm , 1937 .

[14]  David J. Teece,et al.  Towards an economic theory of the multiproduct firm , 1982 .

[15]  L. Alessi,et al.  Liability, control and the organization of economic activity , 1987 .

[16]  John H. Dunning,et al.  The contribution of Edith Penrose to international business scholarship , 2003 .

[17]  Joseph T. Mahoney,et al.  Penrose’s Resource-Based Approach: The Process and Product of Research Creativity , 2002 .

[18]  E. Penrose The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[19]  Nicolai J. Foss,et al.  Edith Penrose, Economics and Strategic Management , 1999 .

[20]  Christos N. Pitelis,et al.  The Growth of the Firm: The Legacy of Edith Penrose , 2003 .

[21]  H. Demsetz Industry Structure, Market Rivalry, and Public Policy , 1973, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[22]  Edith Penrose The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1961 .

[23]  E. Penrose,et al.  International Patenting and the Less-Developed Countries , 1973 .

[24]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[25]  C. Pitelis,et al.  Edith Elura Tilton Penrose: life, contribution and influence , 1999 .

[26]  A. Rugman,et al.  Edith Penrose's contribution to the resource-based view of strategic management , 2002 .