Errors and misconceptions in ECG measurement used for the detection of drug induced QT interval prolongation.

Drug-induced changes in cardiac repolarisation receive substantial attention by regulatory agencies. Since there are presently no established accurate possibilities of testing the propensity to torsade induction during clinical drug development, the regulators require drug-related QT interval changes to be thoroughly investigated with almost all new pharmacological agents. Small QT interval changes are easy to miss and the regulators therefore expect the relevant studies to be very precise. Such a precision is not easy to achieve and different strategies have been proposed. The purpose of this article is to review the most frequent misconceptions and errors in the electrocardiogram handling and measurements related to the detection to drug-induced QT interval changes. Specifically, the article discusses (a) the possibilities of automatic measurement by standard electrocardiographic equipment, (b) the danger of casual measurement by central laboratories handling the electrocardiograms, (c) the selection of recording leads for QT interval measurement, and (d) the problem of the so-called heart rate hysteresis of the QT interval adaptation. Suggestions are made for drug developers of what study design and quality control aspects are needed to avoid the most frequent imprecisions.

[1]  C Antzelevitch,et al.  The potential for QT prolongation and proarrhythmia by non-antiarrhythmic drugs: clinical and regulatory implications. Report on a policy conference of the European Society of Cardiology. , 2000, European heart journal.

[2]  A. Camm,et al.  QT-RR relationship in healthy subjects exhibits substantial intersubject variability and high intrasubject stability. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[3]  P. Rautaharju,et al.  Linearly Scaled, Rate‐Invariant Normal Limits for QT Interval: Eight Decades of Incorrect Application of Power Functions , 2002, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[4]  P. Laguna,et al.  Estimation of the QT/RR hysteresis lag. , 2003, Journal of electrocardiology.

[5]  J. Ruskin,et al.  Drug‐Induced Torsades de Pointes and Implications for Drug Development , 2004, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[6]  Pablo Laguna,et al.  Characterization of QT interval adaptation to RR interval changes and its use as a risk-stratifier of arrhythmic mortality in amiodarone-treated survivors of acute myocardial infarction , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  M Malik,et al.  Problems of Heart Rate Correction in Assessment of Drug‐Induced QT Interval Prolongation , 2001, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[8]  C Antzelevitch,et al.  Acceleration‐Induced Action Potential Prolongation and Early Afterdepolarizations , 1998, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[9]  C. Lau,et al.  Hysteresis of the ventricular paced QT interval in response to abrupt changes in pacing rate. , 1988, Cardiovascular research.

[10]  A J Camm,et al.  Evaluation of Drug-Induced QT Interval Prolongation , 2001, Drug safety.